NBA team all time best player debate

Remove this Banner Ad

In picture form!

http://uproxx.com/dimemag/nba-logos-as-all-stars/2/

A selection

celtics.jpg


nets.jpg


knicks.jpg


76ers.jpg


cavs.jpg


bucks1.jpg


hornets.jpg
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Are they aware Shaq played for Orlando. Dwight Howard has no business in this thread.

Also Wilt Chamberlain, Barkley and Dr.J all played for Philly so that counts out Iverson.

Also Wilt played for the Warriors too. So that counts out Steph.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #8
Are they aware Shaq played for Orlando. Dwight Howard has no business in this thread.

Also Wilt Chamberlain, Barkley and Dr.J all played for Philly so that counts out Iverson.

Also Wilt played for the Warriors too. So that counts out Steph.

think they are aware. however, particularly for the warriors, i doubt the army of warriors fans knew that wilt was one of them
 
Are they aware Shaq played for Orlando. Dwight Howard has no business in this thread.

Also Wilt Chamberlain, Barkley and Dr.J all played for Philly so that counts out Iverson.

Also Wilt played for the Warriors too. So that counts out Steph.

Looking at it, I'm guessing they are only allowing a player once. (if not - there are quite a few that could be argued)
 
Are they aware Shaq played for Orlando. Dwight Howard has no business in this thread.

Also Wilt Chamberlain, Barkley and Dr.J all played for Philly so that counts out Iverson.

Also Wilt played for the Warriors too. So that counts out Steph.

If you count Philly Warriors then, yeah Wilt should be the Warriors one. Though if you are only talking about while they were in SF then he's not really close.

100% agree about Iverson. Should be Barkley or Dr J. Chamberlain was only there for 3 and half years, so hard to rate him GOAT there.

Orlando is an interesting one. Shaq obviously better, but is 4 years enough? Howard scored 50% more, almost twice as many blocks and twice as many rebounds means he has the longevity in his favor.
 
If you count Philly Warriors then, yeah Wilt should be the Warriors one. Though if you are only talking about while they were in SF then he's not really close.

100% agree about Iverson. Should be Barkley or Dr J. Chamberlain was only there for 3 and half years, so hard to rate him GOAT there.

Orlando is an interesting one. Shaq obviously better, but is 4 years enough? Howard scored 50% more, almost twice as many blocks and twice as many rebounds means he has the longevity in his favor.
I guess longevity counts but in the case of two great players like say Iverson v Barkley or Dr.J then it can come into it.

I dont think longevity should come into Shaq v Howard haha.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top