Mystery Neil Armstrong wants you to remove the "protective layer of Truth" if you want to discover anything

Sep 6, 2005
144,446
94,353
AFL Club
Fremantle
Award winning filmmaker Bart Sibrel (Sibrel.com) presents his highly acclaimed (and much hated) controversial documentary showcasing newly discovered behind-the-scenes out-takes from the first mission to the moon, proving that the crew never left earth orbit.

Never before in all of recorded aviation has a flying machine worked on its first attempt, much less the most complicated one ever imagined, landing on another heavenly body on its maiden voyage, and returning roundtrip with a crew that lived to tell, all with 1960's technology. (More computing power is found today in a $10 watch.)

According to William Kaysing, a NASA contractor for Apollo, a classified interdepartmental memo rated the odds of a successful and survivable manned lunar landing on its first attempt at one in ten thousand. That is why the returning men of the mission looked so dejected rather than triumphant at their press conference, as they were blackmailed into lying about the alleged greatest accomplishment of mankind, to the detriment of their own souls.

Sibrel has been interviewed, and his documentary about the moon landings have been featured on, The Tonight Show, The Daily Show, Geraldo at Large, The Abrams Report, Coast to Coast, NBC, CNN, FOX, Time Magazine, The New York Times, The L.A. Times, The Washington Post and USA Today.

The sequel to this film is "Astronauts Gone Wild"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAbpW...

Also see this article Sibrel wrote on the subject:
http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/land-...
 
Sep 6, 2005
144,446
94,353
AFL Club
Fremantle


A sequel to "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon".
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJ...)

Bart Sibrel (Sibrel.com), an award winning, yet controversial filmmaker, personally confronts eight Apollo astronauts with the newly discovered behind-the-scenes outtakes of fake photography which he presented for the first time to the entire world in "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon". When Sibrel, for a second time, publicly exposed the astronaut's criminal behavior to the entire world, this time in their presence, he was threatened with violence by one astronaut, physically assaulted by two other astronauts, and threatened to be assassinated by another astronaut . . . all on camera! . . . revealing also that these men are not the honorable "heroes" that they appear to be, rather they are a bunch or angry and violent criminals, reacting bitterly for having their evil deeds exposed.

At time (8:58), when astronaut Buzz Aldrin was confronted with his guilt by Sibrel, who showed him the newly discovered unedited videotape of the fake photography from his mission on a nearby television monitor during the interview, Aldrin accidentally acknowledged the fraud on camera (thinking it was turned off) by declaring, "And this makes you a real famous person for having discovered all this . . . What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself like this." (After all, how could Sibrel become famous if the videotape evidence was not genuine, his accusations had no evidence, and the declaration of fraud was merely ludicrous?) When Mr. Aldrin realized that his remark uttered in frustration proved his guilt, he quickly tried to change the subject and then threatened to sue Sibrel if he showed his admission of guilt publicly.

At time (40:29), Sibrel offered astronaut Neil Armstrong five thousand dollars cash to donate to his favorite charity, if he would only take a few seconds to swear on a Bible that he actually walked on the moon. Very nervously, and surprisingly, Armstrong refused to bless a charity with a five second oath to what is supposed to be blatantly obvious.

At time (13:40), astronaut Alan Bean accidentally acknowledged that he, in fact, never left earth orbit, by emphatically asserting that he never traveled through the "Van Allen Radiation Belts" (which are at 25,000 miles above standard earth orbit). When his hypocrisy was pointed out to him, he made a stumbling feeble attempt to recover his error though a series of more misspeakings.

At time (48:32), "Peace Activist" astronaut Ed Mitchell violently assaults Sibrel from behind for exposing his lies, though he just said that he never hits anyone. (He can't go 5 seconds without lying.) Mitchell then angrily throws Sibrel out of his home, threatening to get his gun and shoot him! Forgetting that the wireless microphone was still attached to himself after he closed the door (Sibrel also forgetting to turn off the camera as he hastily departed, quickly throwing the camera in the back seat of his rental car), the confidential audio reveals Mitchell and his son covertly discussing enlisting his friends at the CIA to have Sibrel assassinated. To this Sibrel joked, "I don't it's fair that my taxes should have to pay for my own assassination!"

At the end of "Astronauts Gone Wild", Sibrel showcases a short comedic film he created called "Getting Waxed", inspired by astronaut Mitchell's threat, in which the CIA chases and catches him for their devious purposes . . . hoping not to have given them too many ideas with this reenactment!
 

Subutai

All Australian
Nov 28, 2015
767
621
AFL Club
Richmond
fd72b6953ba0.jpg
 

Shane Hird

Cancelled
10k Posts A Star Wars Fan The Cult of Robbo Essendon Player Sponsor 2016
May 8, 2006
13,700
11,421
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
NYJ
I just finished reading Aldrin's auto bio last week.

It all sounded plausible to me.
 

Subutai

All Australian
Nov 28, 2015
767
621
AFL Club
Richmond
Astronauts are just military pilots with special training. They're not politicians or bureaucrats, and they will react accordingly.

UNITED STATES

Gordon Cooper, Astronaut (Mercury-Atlas 9, May 15, 1963; Gemini 5, August 21, 1965), Col. USAF (Ret); letter to Granada's Ambassador Griffith at the United Nations, November 9, 1978:

"I wanted to convey to you my views on our extra-terrestrial visitors popularly referred to as ' UFOs,' and suggest what might be done to properly deal with them.

"I believe that these extra-terrestrial vehicles and their crews are visiting this planet from other planets, which obviously are a little more technically advanced than we are here on earth. I feel that we need to have a top level, coordinated program to scientifically collect and analyze data from all over the earth concerning any type of encounter, and to determine how best to interface with these visitors in a friendly fashion. We may first have to show them that we have learned to resolve our problems by peaceful means, rather than warfare, before we are accepted as fully qualified universal team members. This acceptance would have tremendous possibilities of advancing our world in all areas. Certainly then it would seem that the UN has a vested interest in handling this subject properly and expeditiously.

"I should point out that I am not an experienced UFO professional researcher. I have not yet had the privilege of flying a UFO, nor of meeting the crew of one. I do feel that I am somewhat qualified to discuss them since I have been into the fringes of the vast areas in which they travel. Also, I did have occasion in 1951 to have two days of observation of many flights of them, of different sizes, flying in fighter formation, generally from east to west over Europe. They were at a higher altitude than we could reach with our jet fighters of that time.

"I would also like to point out that most astronauts are very reluctant to even discuss UFOs due to the great numbers of people who have indiscriminately sold fake stories and forged documents abusing their names and reputations without hesitation. Those few astronauts who have continued to have participation in the UFO field have had to do so very cautiously. There are several of us who do believe in UFOs and who have had occasion to see a UFO on the ground, or from an airplane. There was only one occasion from space which may have been a UFO.

"If the UN agrees to pursue this project, and to lend their credibility to it, perhaps many more well qualified people will agree to step forth and provide help and information." (Good, T., ibid.)

On several occasions, he described his own sighting in Germany in 1951:

"Several days in a row we sighted groups of metallic, saucer-shaped vehicles at great altitudes over the base, and we tried to get close to them, but they were able to change direction faster than our fighters. I do believe UFOs exist and that the truly unexplained ones are from some other technologically advanced civilization. From my association with aircraft and spacecraft, I think I have a pretty good idea of what everyone on this planet has and their performance capabilities, and I'm sure some of the UFOs at least are not from anywhere on Earth." (Omni, Vol. 2, No. 6, March 1980.)



Donald (Deke) Slayton, "Mercury Seven" astronaut, stated in an interview, that he had seen a UFO in 1951:

"I was testing a P-51 fighter in Minneapolis when I spotted this object. I was at about 10,000 feet on a nice, bright, sunny afternoon. I thought the object was a kite, then realized that no kite is gonna [sic] fly that high. As I got closer, it looked like a weather balloon, gray and about three feet in diameter. But as soon as I got behind the darn thing, it didn't look like a balloon anymore. It looked like a saucer, a disc. About that same time, I realized that it was suddenly going away from me - and there I was, running at about 300 miles an hour. I tracked it for a little while, and then all of sudden the damn thing just took off. It pulled about a 45-degree climbing turn and accelerated and just flat disappeared. A couple of days later, I was having a beer with my commanding officer, and I thought, ' What the hell, I'd better mention something to him about it.' I did, and he told me to get on down to intelligence and give them a report. I did, and I never heard anything more on it." (National Enquirer, October 23, 1979.)



Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 lunar module pilot and founder of the Institute of Noetic Sciences:

"I've changed my position in the last two or three years - the last two years to be precise - to suggest that the evidence is strong enough that we really need to have serious open discussion and release of information that it is quite clear the government and other governments do hold, and that this become a part of our official knowledge... Now, whether it's true or not, it deserves to be handled with a serious investigation. There is too much smoke here not to be fire, and so I personally in the last couple of years have come out - I don't know the answers, but I've come out - and I say, this has gone far enough. If it's real, let's get it out in the open; let's break the deadlock that bureaucracy has on this. There is enough evidence pointing in the direction that clearly there is information being withheld. How far we can go with it, I don't know." (Excerpt from his lecture "Science and the Inner Experience" sponsored by the friends of The Institute of Noetic Sciences, New York City, December 4, 1991.)



Al Worden, Apollo 15 astronaut who later became a poet. In a lengthy interview in a documentary produced for the 20th anniversary of the landing on the Moon, Worden discussed his views that Earth was probably visited in the past by extraterrestrial explorers. He began by commenting on the well known "UFO interpretation" of the vision of the prophet Ezekiel in the Bible:

"And a literal translation describes very clearly a spacecraft with the ability to land vertically and take-off vertically, and it was an object that looked very much like the Lunar Module that we used on the Moon; and if it's going to land vertically and take-off vertically, it had to come from some place and go back some place.

"In my mind the universe has to be cyclic, so that in one galaxy if there is a planet maybe that has arrived at the point of becoming unlivable, you will find in another part of a different galaxy a planet that has just formed which is perfect for habitation. I see some kind of intelligent being, like us, skipping around the universe from planet to planet as, let's say, the South Pacific Indians do on the islands, where they skip from island to island. When the first island blows up due to a volcano, they will have their progeny on all these other islands and they will be able to continue the species. I think that's what the [alien] space program is all about.

"I think we may be a combination of creatures that were living here on Earth some time in the past, and having a visitation, if you will, by creatures from somewhere else in the universe, and those two species getting together and having progeny. I am not at all convinced that we are not the result of that particular union some many thousands of years ago. If that is the case in fact, a very small group of explorers could land on a planet and create successors to themselves that would eventually take up the pursuit of, let's say, inhabiting the rest of the universe." (Excerpts from his interview in the documentary "The Other Side of the Moon," produced by Michael G. Lemle, and broadcast by PBS in July 1989.)



Eugene Cernan, Apollo 17 Commander:

"I'm one of those guys who has never seen a UFO. But I've been asked, and I've said publicly I thought they were somebody else; some other civilization..." (Chriss, Nicholas, "Cernan Says Other Earths Exist," Los Angeles Times, January 6, 1973.)



Story Musgrave, Space shuttle astronaut who flew on the repair mission of the Hubble Space Telescope:

"I try to communicate with the life that's out there. I'm serious. It is not that far out. When I'm circling around out there, I try in whatever ways I can to get them to come down here and get me." (The Houston Post, December 1, 1993.)



USSR/RUSSIA

Yevegni Khrunov, Soyuz-5 spacecraft pilot in 1969:


"Is the presence of extraterrestrial civilizations conceivable? Of course. Before the uniqueness of the earth is demonstrated, this assumption should be taken as quite legitimate. As regards UFOs, their presence cannot be denied: thousands of people have seen them. It may be that their source is optical effects, but some of their properties, for instance, their ability to change course by 90 degrees at great speed, simply stagger the imagination." (Sputnik, "UFOs Through the Eyes of Cosmonauts," December 1980.)


Vladimir Kovalyonok, Major-General of Aviation stated:


"On May 5, 1981, we were in orbit [in the Salyut-6 space station]. I saw an object that didn't resemble any cosmic objects I'm familiar with. It was a round object which resembled a melon, round and a little bit elongated. In front of this object was something that resembled a gyrating depressed cone. I can draw it, it's difficult to describe. The object resembles a barbell. I saw it becoming transparent and like with a ' body' inside. At the other end I saw something like gas discharging, like a reactive object. Then something happened that is very difficult for me to describe from the point of view of physics. Last year in the magazine Nature I read about a physicist... we tried together to explain this phenomenon and we decided it was a ' plasmaform.' I have to recognize that it did not have an artificial origin. It was not artificial because an artificial object couldn't attain this form. I don't know of anything that can make this movement... tightening, then expanding, pulsating. Then as I was observing, something happened, two explosions. One explosion, and then 0.5 seconds later, the second part exploded. I called my colleague Viktor [Savinykh], but he didn't arrive in time to see anything.

"What are the particulars? First conclusion: the object moved in a suborbital path, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to see it. There were two clouds, like smoke, that formed a barbell. It came near me and I watched it. Then we entered in to the shade for two or three minutes after this happened. When we came out of the shade we didn't see anything. But during a certain time, we and the craft were moving together." (Videotaped interview with Giorgio Bongiovanni in the village of Kosnikov, near Moscow, 1993. Videotape courtesy of Michael Hesemann.)



Major-General Pavel Popovich, pioneer Cosmonaut, "Hero of the Soviet Union," and the President of All-Union Ufology Association of the Commonwealth of Independent States:

"Today it can be stated with a high degree of confidence that observed manifestations of UFOs are no longer confined to the modern picture of the world, or the simple refutation of the orthodox natural science paradigm. The historical evidence of the phenomenon, the singularity of its newly gained kinematic, energetic, and psychophysical features allows us to hypothesize that ever since mankind has been co-existing with this extraordinary substance, it has manifested a high level of intelligence and technology. The UFO sightings have become the constant component of human activity and require a serious global study. In order to realize the position of man on earth and in the universe, ufology, the scientific study of the UFO phenomenon, should take place in the midst of other sciences dealing with man and the world...

"The influence the UFO has on people, as well as the effects it produces, should become the items of special research. The UFO's interaction with the environment, the behavior that it motivates, and its genesis, also present interesting areas for concentrated study. Today, many specialists have come to the opinion that [UFO] phenomenon research should be taken up along with understanding and comprehension of other unexplained phenomena... The development of new approaches for the identification and study of energy and information processes will allow for an enthusiastic move toward the comprehension of the phenomenon. The results of these studies should aid the survival of the people on earth...

"It's necessary to carry out the popular ufological enlightenment, since the probability for a meeting of a person with a UFO exists, and this person should be ready for this event. Precautionary measures are especially important. It's necessary to tell the truth, which has been distorted previously by the politically engaged sciences and most recently by ufological dilettantes. The main purpose of the primary local groups, that of controlling the ufological situation, mustn't be forgotten. The ufologists should know all the UFO's landing places and contacts in their regions. They should have relations with the local authorities, and in particular, with the police, the civil defense bodies, as well as information, scientific, and medical organizations." (Popovich, P., "Ufology in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Organization Problems," in the MUFON 1992 International UFO Symposium Proceedings.)

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc521.htm
 

Shane Hird

Cancelled
10k Posts A Star Wars Fan The Cult of Robbo Essendon Player Sponsor 2016
May 8, 2006
13,700
11,421
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
NYJ
But not once in Buzz's book did he mentioned radiation belts.

Is that radiation belt really true?
 

Subutai

All Australian
Nov 28, 2015
767
621
AFL Club
Richmond
Last edited:

Shane Hird

Cancelled
10k Posts A Star Wars Fan The Cult of Robbo Essendon Player Sponsor 2016
May 8, 2006
13,700
11,421
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
NYJ
So much so, that even when they closed the eyes

the could still see blue dot zipping around

cause the radiation went through the space ship, the suit, the eye lids... pretty cool

But in that video it says it's impossible to pass through it, go to the moon and return back?
 
But in that video it says it's impossible to pass through it, go to the moon and return back?
A claim made without proof that seems to underpin the conspiracy theories. Both belts contain electrons (beta particles), most of which can be stopped by a few mm of aluminium. The inner belt contains more dangerous protons but is small enough to avoid. Obviously you can't shield from all the radiation but any physicist will tell you the body can survive moderate, short term increases in exposure.

The USSR sent a spacecraft (Zond 5) around the moon and back a few months before Apollo 8. The crew apparently included 2 tortoises who survived - if animals can survive the radiation, so can humans. But for some reason the conspiracy theorists ignore this!
 

little graham

Brownlow Medallist
10k Posts
Sep 18, 2013
17,752
11,820
AFL Club
Adelaide
That Bart Sibrel guy does come off as a wacko/idiot when talking with the Astronauts. No wonder they didn't give him any time with the way he carried on blindly.
But if you know what he does, have investigated and gone over everything, question yourself as well, that's how you come across. Its an energy few can keep in control off.

Remember he was talking to scumbags revered as heroes.
 
Oct 15, 2007
33,996
31,537
PCO
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
The reactions of the astronauts to this guy are how any reasonable person would react in that circumstance.

Imagine you achieved something great in your life, and some low life in a wig comes up to you calling you a "liar and a coward" and strenuously challenges that you ever did it. I'd want to punch the DH too!
 
Sep 6, 2005
144,446
94,353
AFL Club
Fremantle
But if you know what he does, have investigated and gone over everything, question yourself as well, that's how you come across. Its an energy few can keep in control off.

Remember he was talking to scumbags revered as heroes.
His whole manner and approach was unprofessional, cowardly, and insincere (no humility). It's like he wanted to go full boar in like he did so he could get exactly those kinds of reactions from the astronauts, which would then make it appear more like they had something to hide etc. All that Aldrin said to him was on the mark. He calmly talked to him about it, and explained what he was doing wrong, etc, but the Sibrel guy just continued on without class.

It's like he's trying to be the next Michael Moore. But he's too christian-fanatic about it all. And lacks the true investigative journalism approach.
 
Sep 6, 2005
144,446
94,353
AFL Club
Fremantle
The reactions of the astronauts to this guy are how any reasonable person would react in that circumstance.

Imagine you achieved something great in your life, and some low life in a wig comes up to you calling you a "liar and a coward" and strenuously challenges that you ever did it. I'd want to punch the DH too!
Even if you were just a normal person. Not having achieved anything. Just had some wacko religious dude following you around with a bible and/or camera asking you to react. Actually....it's exactly like when a normal everyday person is walking along the street and those charity workers come running over to you to give you a spiel and ask for money, and being so fake friendly to you. You just want to turn your eyes away, pretend to not see them, and completely ignore their words. Best to not have them see you connect eyes with them. Then you're effed. Imagine if those bastards kept following you down the road hundreds of meters. Sheesh.
 

BustedWing

Premiership Player
Aug 29, 2013
3,091
2,038
AFL Club
Collingwood
But in that video it says it's impossible to pass through it, go to the moon and return back?
The radiation belt is bad news long term for humans, absolutely, but a few days travelling through them is fine. It did increase the astronauts risk for cancer a little bit, but nothing so severe that it wasn't deemed an acceptable risk. If they had been caught in a solar flare, however, that would have been extremely bad news. Good thing they are somewhat predictable.
 

little graham

Brownlow Medallist
10k Posts
Sep 18, 2013
17,752
11,820
AFL Club
Adelaide
.
But not once in Buzz's book did he mentioned radiation belts.
Is that radiation belt really true?

it's true it exists.

It would of cost a lot of money getting them through it. If they really went to the moon, you would see records of all the work going into getting through it twice. The astronauts would of been trained extensively with dealing with radiation. This would be etched into their memory.

If you have a look at footage from Chernobyl and what the radiation did to the camera on board helicopters flying there as the emergency was on. You get an idea of what they would of gone through. That radiation eventually brought helicopters down. The astronauts would been trained extensively dealing with on board malfunctions as result of the radiation.

Look at Fukushima and whats happening to robots there
 
Oct 15, 2007
33,996
31,537
PCO
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
.


it's true it exists.

It would of cost a lot of money getting them through it. If they really went to the moon, you would see records of all the work going into getting through it twice. The astronauts would of been trained extensively with dealing with radiation. This would be etched into their memory.

If you have a look at footage from Chernobyl and what the radiation did to the camera on board helicopters flying there as the emergency was on. You get an idea of what they would of gone through. That radiation eventually brought helicopters down. The astronauts would been trained extensively dealing with on board malfunctions as result of the radiation.

Look at Fukushima and whats happening to robots there

Don't want to be a grammar nazi and I do enjoy your posts, but it's would have, not would of. Anyone who says "would of been" instead of "would have been" comes across sounding uneducated, which I'm sure you don't want to seem.
 
Back