You'd have to read the minutes, do they release them
-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Opinion New AFC HQ: Stalled Indefinitely
- Thread starter Elite Crow
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Does it matter, as you understand commercial leases better than most, I will admit not my area of discussion,
Does it really matter who Crows get the lease from, SANFL or Council
To me all that matter is that the Crows get a long term lease with unrestricted training access to 2 ovals with full advertisement rites on all AFLW and SANFL game day events, a state of the art training center, and of course a place to sit down and watch training,
To fold to Trigg's threat to bring the board with him if he's terminated.
The reason behind it was real as was the threat. I would expect it was arguable as to whether he had the goods, but the board decided not to find out. From what I was told it was not a unanimous decision.
Except the terrorists within. Knowing our club, it's likely all the board weren't all availed of information evenly. And that conflict prior to such a vote wouldn't be disclosed. This bit is just me spitballing, but I could see Chappy up to his eyeballs in it and acting to protect his interests ahead of everything else.
Nice little charade of trigg offering his resignation and it not being accepted.
- Sep 30, 2014
- 18,956
- 40,126
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Funny enough, Trigg then lands at another club for a CEO role he’s hopelessly unqualified for, then at a business whose owner finds his way on the AFC board. So incestuous.
Also am I the only one who never believes the story that Bob Foord was fully endorsed to become Chairman before he passed away which left the club scrambling? I hope I’m wrong but.
Also am I the only one who never believes the story that Bob Foord was fully endorsed to become Chairman before he passed away which left the club scrambling? I hope I’m wrong but.
If you’re going Boyle, you go full Boyle. When asked why wasn’t he sacked, which shuts down the topic quicker? “Didn’t think it a sackable offence” or “you know what, he resigned, but he’s so good at everything else he’s ever done that we refused to accept it.”
you’re not the only one, it’s mentioned a bit in the ‘sack everyone’ thread stickied at the top.
The Adelaide city council have proposed a $170 levy for residents and a $700 levy for commercial property each year for the next 2 years to pay for a new aquatic center. 
..The Adelaide city council have proposed a $170 levy for residents and a $700 levy for commercial property each year for the next 2 years to pay for a new aquatic center.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I’d be pissed if I owned a commercial property and having to fork out $700 a year because of a bunch of w***ersThe Adelaide city council have proposed a $170 levy for residents and a $700 levy for commercial property each year for the next 2 years to pay for a new aquatic center.
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 77,305
- 151,853
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #2,818
Maybe Thebarton is all a ruse and we're Pavliching the ACC for a better deal
The incompetence of that council is truly breath taking.
Punchy Bassett
Brownlow Medallist
Just charge it to the Parklands preservation societyThe Adelaide city council have proposed a $170 levy for residents and a $700 levy for commercial property each year for the next 2 years to pay for a new aquatic center.
BrendanAFCfan
Rookie
- Aug 20, 2020
- 44
- 35
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
They are a bunch of campaigners, they really are.
Step 1 - Ratepayer plebiscite voting yes or no for AFC development. If 50% plus 1 vote yes then it goes ahead. If not, proceed to step 2.
Step 2 - charge only the no voters whatever levy is required to make the centre cost neutral.
When it comes to putting hand in pocket, I doubt they'd get close to deploying step 2.
Last edited:
Just a thought, but if the old Victoria Park racecourse is no longer used for the SuperLoop, wouldnt that location be ideal for a new club base? I mean, there is a stack of space so we could create at least two ovals (similar to West Coast), it has already been used for sporting events (so the locals of Rose Park can hardly complain about destroying "their" parklands), it has easy access to the city and Adelaide Oval, There is already an existing Grandstand that we could retro fit into a training base / offices etc. To me (ACC and locals aside) it feels like a no brainer.....
Similar threads
