I thought Fagan specifically said that changing the logo wasn't in our short or medium term plans
He also said that about moving out of West Lakes....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I thought Fagan specifically said that changing the logo wasn't in our short or medium term plans
How hard is it to create and implement a new logo?The logo is over ten years old now. Due for a new.one even if it was not as disliked.
However it really should not be a priority over the new HQ, setting up the SANFL team, and of course the AFLW team.
You would think it would happen within a year or so though. It is quite dated now.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
You are right.. Probably not deemed that important.How hard is it to create and implement a new logo?
You hire a design company to come up with some options, you vote on the preferred model and then you get it ready to launch the following year.
Not that hard and not something that would take up much time, other priorities is a poxy excuse. They just didn’t think it was that bad that it needed to be change and they think the logo is unimportant.
They needed to though, they needed a logo.You are right.. Probably not deemed that important.
They did develop the WFAO logo though.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
The problem is - whenever they poll the supporters about the logo, they get really positive feedback.How hard is it to create and implement a new logo?
You hire a design company to come up with some options, you vote on the preferred model and then you get it ready to launch the following year.
Not that hard and not something that would take up much time, other priorities is a poxy excuse. They just didn’t think it was that bad that it needed to be change and they think the logo is unimportant.
Democracy is awesome.The problem is - whenever they poll the supporters about the logo, they get really positive feedback.
Personally, I agree with you. But frustratingly we might be in the minority.
Unless we get Scorpus to run another bot and we take control over the vote.The problem is - whenever they poll the supporters about the logo, they get really positive feedback.
Personally, I agree with you. But frustratingly we might be in the minority.
Smack them in the headWhat if they make the logo worse?
I can imagine the old W&C hospital being turned into apartments along the same lines as the old Queen Victoria. The parklands there are currently leased and used by University District Cricket ClubIt’s a pitty we’ve gone so early on this.
Around 2024 the new children’s hospital will opened by the RAH. Therefore the old building and site will be vacant and the PERFECT place for redevelopment of a multi-use facility. Right by the AO and right by parkland ovals. But I guess we need to seize and oppprtunity when it presents.
I can imagine the old W&C hospital being turned into apartments along the same lines as the old Queen Victoria. The parklands there are currently leased and used by University District Cricket Club
I’d put change of logo ahead of all those achievements
Also it is surrounded by roads. Aquatic centre is attached to the Parklands.I can imagine the old W&C hospital being turned into apartments along the same lines as the old Queen Victoria. The parklands there are currently leased and used by University District Cricket Club
Also Properly run and establish and it could be a Profit making venture or at least cost-free.*licensed to the Adelaide University Sports Association.
Subtle, but important difference if anyone had the political will (which they wouldn't).
The Aquatic Centre is a rare opportunity in that it's the only site where you're not going to get significant pushback from the Council (and less pushback from the Parklands Preservation people).
The logo is over ten years old now. Due for a new.one even if it was not as disliked.
However it really should not be a priority over the new HQ, setting up the SANFL team, and of course the AFLW team.
You would think it would happen within a year or so though. It is quite dated now.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
How hard is it to create and implement a new logo?
You hire a design company to come up with some options, you vote on the preferred model and then you get it ready to launch the following year.
Not that hard and not something that would take up much time, other priorities is a poxy excuse. They just didn’t think it was that bad that it needed to be change and they think the logo is unimportant.
The Aquatic centre site is much larger and provides more space to have the indoor facility right next to 1 or 2 ovals. The W&C site is much smaller and the land would not be flat there either. As mentioned above this will most likely end up as apartments if it ever goes ahead.It’s a pitty we’ve gone so early on this.
Around 2024 the new children’s hospital will opened by the RAH. Therefore the old building and site will be vacant and the PERFECT place for redevelopment of a multi-use facility. Right by the AO and right by parkland ovals. But I guess we need to seize and oppprtunity when it presents.
Did we try and hide the story on Saturday night (successfully) for some reason.
How many kids have you polled?I wouldn't be touching the logo - kids love it.
How many kids have you polled?
You,I've got a 9 year old son and he's got this thing called a voice so when I ask him a question he responds (sometimes) with an answer. Funny enough, his mates have also got one as well.
Whose a clever boy?