
With a lot of teams having to reduce number of coaches due to reduction of soft cap, are there any coaches being released who may be a good fit at the Crows ? Eg Dean Solomon .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Essendon v Port Adelaide - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Bombers at 53% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Supercoach Round 3 SC Talk - Round 3 Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 2 AF Talk - Round 3 AF Trades
The problem is that the coaches made available by CV-19 are the worst performing coaches at their respective clubs.With a lot of teams having to reduce number of coaches due to reduction of soft cap, are there any coaches being released who may be a good fit at the Crows ? Eg Dean Solomon .
Surely the best coaches are already here right under our noses? Who’s ready to step up from the esports department?
No - I don't want anyone who has ever set foot in the club before. Though I could change my mind for Malcolm Blight.A couple of posters have said there’s whispers of VB coming back, not sure why he would leave the rolled gold Eagles mids for our disaster but who knows. And whilst it’s yet another ex player back at least he’s done a few years at a really successful, well run club. I wouldn’t be opposed I guess.
A couple of posters have said there’s whispers of VB coming back, not sure why he would leave the rolled gold Eagles mids for our disaster but who knows. And whilst it’s yet another ex player back at least he’s done a few years at a really successful, well run club. I wouldn’t be opposed I guess.
The problem is that the coaches made available by CV-19 are the worst performing coaches at their respective clubs.
Think of it this way...
Team X has 4 coaches - it rates them 9/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 3/10. They cut the coach rated 3/10.
Team Y has 4 coaches - it rates them 8/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 4/10. They cut the coach rated 4/10.
Adelaide has coaches rated 7/10 (Clarke), 1/10, and 1/10 (I'm being very generous to Hart & Godden).
If we replace Hart and Godden with the coaches cut by Teams X & Y, then we end up with a list of 7/10, 4/10, and 3/10. It's an improvement on what we have at present - but it's still easily the worst in the competition.
Why is there so much hate for Godden. Is any of it based on his known performance as a coach or is it because of our performance?The problem is that the coaches made available by CV-19 are the worst performing coaches at their respective clubs.
Think of it this way...
Team X has 4 coaches - it rates them 9/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 3/10. They cut the coach rated 3/10.
Team Y has 4 coaches - it rates them 8/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 4/10. They cut the coach rated 4/10.
Adelaide has coaches rated 7/10 (Clarke), 1/10, and 1/10 (I'm being very generous to Hart & Godden).
If we replace Hart and Godden with the coaches cut by Teams X & Y, then we end up with a list of 7/10, 4/10, and 3/10. It's an improvement on what we have at present - but it's still easily the worst in the competition.
Why is there so much hate for Godden. Is any of it based on his known performance as a coach or is it because of our performance?
No - I don't want anyone who has ever set foot in the club before. Though I could change my mind for Malcolm Blight.
So if your place of work is performing badly and your a work group leader, they need to sack youI mean, people have eyes, have you watched our midfield this year?
"you're"So if your place of work is performing badly and your a work group leader, they need to sack you
The problem is that the coaches made available by CV-19 are the worst performing coaches at their respective clubs.
Think of it this way...
Team X has 4 coaches - it rates them 9/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 3/10. They cut the coach rated 3/10.
Team Y has 4 coaches - it rates them 8/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 4/10. They cut the coach rated 4/10.
Adelaide has coaches rated 7/10 (Clarke), 1/10, and 1/10 (I'm being very generous to Hart & Godden).
If we replace Hart and Godden with the coaches cut by Teams X & Y, then we end up with a list of 7/10, 4/10, and 3/10. It's an improvement on what we have at present - but it's still easily the worst in the competition.
No club is culling their better performed coaches.Not necessarily. Perhaps the 7-8/10s are on inflated contracts. They create the most space by releasing those.
Now it may mean we have to pay up. But at this point we will probably have to to entice anyone anyway.
It's the easiest way of filling the vacancies. It's certainly not the best.Agreed.
In my opinion going for the best of the discarded coaches is the safest route, but not the best.
You need a mixture of senior and rookie coaches. We have a reasonable (not amazing) senior assistant in Clarke, an experienced but incompetent assistant in Hart, and a poor man's rookie in Gooden.What we should be doing is targeting the new people with potential talent who would normally be entering the assistant coaching arena at AFL level under normal circumstances but otherwise aren't getting that opportunity due to Covid and the flow on.
Lets take a gamble on some coaches who aren't already discarded AFL assistant coaches. THAT is where we potentially can pick up some genuine talent we normally wouldn't have access to.
Only coaching position I wouldn't take the calculated gamble risk with is the senior assistant, because we DESPERATELY need one.
It could also be based on when contracts are ending and what a payout could cost.No club is culling their better performed coaches.
If we're talking about paying up, and enticing coaches away, then we're not talking about the pool of coaches who were culled due to Coronavirus budget restrictions.
The headline would be 'Nigel Smart, Just Right'so kids, that’s the story of how Nigel Smart came to be the forwards, midfield and defense coach all the same time.
The problem is that the coaches made available by CV-19 are the worst performing coaches at their respective clubs.
Think of it this way...
Team X has 4 coaches - it rates them 9/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 3/10. They cut the coach rated 3/10.
Team Y has 4 coaches - it rates them 8/10, 8/10, 7/10, and 4/10. They cut the coach rated 4/10.
Adelaide has coaches rated 7/10 (Clarke), 1/10, and 1/10 (I'm being very generous to Hart & Godden).
If we replace Hart and Godden with the coaches cut by Teams X & Y, then we end up with a list of 7/10, 4/10, and 3/10. It's an improvement on what we have at present - but it's still easily the worst in the competition.