Didn't it just.Nicking off really went from nought to 100 in a short time
Sent from my SM-A326B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't it just.Nicking off really went from nought to 100 in a short time
That's the thing now, I think the ICC or was it MCC recently said they'll no longer be referring to batsmen rather batters and since then in newspapers they just say batters now.That's because it is more inclusive, and seeings as you don't just have men's cricket on the telly anymore I reckon you're going to have to get used to that one.
I thought I was going a little mad with how quickly that became the accepted terminology from previous terms such as "got the edge" or "nicked it to slips" and my inability to remember it from my youth.Nicking off really went from nought to 100 in a short time
I still don't see the issue with using the terms 'batsman' and 'batsmen' when you're talking about blokes.
I thought bowling gas ended when Warne retired and baked beans were no longer on the Indian tour menu.Batsman who can ' go up and down the gears'
Swing the ball around corners
Bowling 'gas' seems to have made a comeback
I was going to post this one. It kind of makes sense in line with spinners but it's a bit odd on the ears.Pacers for fast bowlers although it's Indians who seem particularly guilty of this.
That's the thing now, I think the ICC or was it MCC recently said they'll no longer be referring to batsmen rather batters and since then in newspapers they just say batters now.
But when it first reared its ugly head in the 1990s I don't think it was for those inclysivity reasons and we had the strange situation for the next 15-20 years where all the people in the game referred to batters and almost everybody watching it said batsmen, it was very odd.
Sent from my SM-A326B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Cow corner is a little straighter than a traditional deep mid wicket IMO.Clearly my experience differs, even though I was born in '87.
That's ok... I always had it referred to as "deep mid-wicket" but nobody says that anymore.
Only a matter of time until "Mammoth maximum" becomes a thing"Mammoth". Everything in the cricket world is "mammoth" these days.
"Australia have set England a MAMMOTH 4th innings target."
"Williamson has made a MAMMOTH 150 against South Africa"
"West Indies have a MAMMOTH task ahead of them if they are to save this one."
I'm sure some do, just as some don't. Either way it doesn't really matter.I understand it may be too complicated for the average journalist to figure out, but maybe if it's a mens match use the term batsman and if it's chick cricket go with batter.
Binga: He's got an arm like a frozen rope...
Is Third Man still a legit fielding position??
It is still a position, but now the term "Third" is used. Even the test commentators now use third.Is Third Man still a legit fielding position??
We could fill this thread up with Flemings weird sayings