Mind your language, MHDKA.
Very courageous of you to sit down at a keyboard and be offensive.
As I said my time in this place is limited and I prefer to generally barrack for my football team rather than being involved in a hate-fest. I have stated that the 'sponsorship alternatives' answers lie therein, no need for longwinded 'debate', in my opinion, simple as that. End of story as far as I am concerned. No long-windiness from me. It is regretful that a poster of the likes of you turned that thread into spite rather than adhere to the specifics of the question.
I also said that I will no longer be partaking in the Tasmanian sponsorship discussion as I would rather spend my time discussing the team's fortunes. I cant be bothered reading, what I see as repetitious boring posts, simple as that.
Funny gary I didn't know that GUTLESS was a swearword!
Obviously this is a forum that has different rules for those that agree with moderators.
In fact GUTLESS seems an appropriate word for your actions - if you didn't know it means :
lacking courage, fortitude, or determination.
I actually made the post you question because I think your previous post was so ironic - you open up a thread asking for alternatives & then you constantly
refuse to do posters the courtesy of responding to their posts which have been made in response to yours.
This post is simply another example; an internet forum is a place for discussion & debate - I have done that with far more analysis than seems to be the norm on this site in response to your posts - & your standard response seems to be:
I don't agree with your opinion - you are wrong - no more posts.
Well I think that is GUTLESS (means
lacking courage, fortitude, or determination).
If you are going to raise an issue in a thread be prepared to debate it - I am always prepare to discuss anything I post - I don't run away.
(& PS: gary, if I hadn't used the word GUTLESS you probably still wouldn't have responded!)
Frankly I think yours and many other posters posts on this issue can really only be considered self-serving - you try to take the moral high ground when in fact the detrimental issues surrounding this sponsorship deal don't affect you because you are located outside victoria!
THE fact is I have foxtel but I can still see this deal does no favours for the average Hawk supporter.
And because you don't live in victoria so you cannot identify with average victorian based hawthorn supporters?