That's a bit rich coming from the master of vomit posting. I must of struck a nerve with you, your reverting to namecalling.Can you stop acting like the fountain of knowledge given you're probably the worst poster on this board?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a bit rich coming from the master of vomit posting. I must of struck a nerve with you, your reverting to namecalling.Can you stop acting like the fountain of knowledge given you're probably the worst poster on this board?
Are you asking him if he's the worst poster on the board or stating that he is?Can you stop acting like the fountain of knowledge given you're probably the worst poster on this board?
I'm telling him he's the worst poster and asking him a question. But he's gone angry and calling me a name caller (what???) and also saying that I'm getting salty (the number one calling card for someone who is getting MAD)Are you asking him if he's the worst poster on the board or stating that he is?
Love how ChookNuz liked you comment yet he's the one who turned it personalAs amusing as it is seeing tiffs between people....let's TRY to keep the debate about the actual football/teams/players.
ANYWAY...
As amusing as it is seeing tiffs between people....let's TRY to keep the debate about the actual football/teams/players.
Love how ChookNuz liked you comment yet he's the one who turned it personal
That's a bit rich coming from the master of vomit posting. I must of struck a nerve with you, your reverting to namecalling.
Would have been called on field fumble.still they would power away eyes shut arms flailing until one of them connected with his own jaw, putting him down for the count. .
That win last week was ****ing crucial for Philly
Now they go equal top of the East with a win, where as losing this week and last week would have put em 3 games back
Every team is in win now mode.I mean it's more crucial for you since you are clearly in 'win now' mode.
Every team is in win now mode.
But the Browns are still trying to win now. The statement is fine because there comes a time when winning now is more important than anytime but the playoffs. Winning now puts a gap on your Division Rivals. Winning Now puts Philly in equal top spot. Winning Now is a good name for a racehorse.Absolute bollocks. Browns say hi. We also traded our starting QB 8 days before the season. What a dumb statement.
But the Browns are still trying to win now. The statement is fine because there comes a time when winning now is more important than anytime but the playoffs. Winning now puts a gap on your Division Rivals. Winning Now puts Philly in equal top spot. Winning Now is a good name for a racehorse.
Even the browns are trying to win every game they can, do you think hue jackson wants to go 0-16? or any player on that team wants to be part of of a historically bad losing team? This is not the nba where one good draft pick can turn your franchise around. You even saw it last year when chip got fired and we played the Giants, we were not trying to lose the game, pat shurmer had no interest in going 0-1 as an interim head coach.Absolute bollocks. Browns say hi. We also traded our starting QB 8 days before the season. What a dumb statement.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/10/browns_hue_jackson_we_are_not.htmlWell no they aren't because they have allowed two Pro Bowl caliber lineman to leave, traded out of pick 2 and the chance to take a franchise QB and are now trying to trade their best player. Hardly the actions of a team looking to win. The Niners are also trying to trade whatever pieces they can.
Even the browns are trying to win every game they can, do you think hue jackson wants to go 0-16? or any player on that team wants to be part of of a historically bad losing team? This is not the nba where one good draft pick can turn your franchise around. You even saw it last year when chip got fired and we played the Giants, we were not trying to lose the game, pat shurmer had no interest in going 0-1 as an interim head coach.
Also what does trading our starting qb have to do with what "mode" we are in? Roseman traded him because we had an undesirable situation at the position and he was very opportunistic. Losses do not give us a better first round pick next year and we are linked to trading for a good WR, so I would argue that if any team was in "win now" mode it would be us.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2016/10/browns_hue_jackson_we_are_not.html
http://www.espn.com/blog/san-franci...y-on-joe-staley-trade-rumors-thats-news-to-me
I am sure both teams would entertain offers for these guys or others if other teams wanted to overpay, but I think you could say that about any gm in any sport.
So you have given 2/32 teams in the league that are not in "win now" mode, do you have any more because that is a pretty small sample, it implies that 30/32 are. I tried to think of some more but every other team that sucks (Bears, Jags to name 2) are clearly do not have this mindset because it would result in people losing their jobs. Sorry to criticize every statement you have made, but its hard not to when you reply with "What a dumb statement"
Bring on another 6-6 crap game tie, I reckon.
In true Chad fashion it looks like this one backfired.
Yeah, but at least my team didn't lose today.
Yeah, but at least my team didn't lose today.
You're in last place, slow clap Chad.