- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Posts
- 16,559
- Reaction score
- 24,072
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- New England Patriots, Man City
- Banned
- #476
it didn't make sense on any level, whether from a perspective of "developing kids" or "saving Mick's job" because NG was both a kid, and best 22. Both goals were aligned. It was nonsense to play him one quarter as sub, a quarter in which he performed really well and laid many tackles, and then drop him when he clearly outperformed many older teammates.
The main thing is that Mick is gone and Nick Graham isn't. All good.
I wouldn't have had said at the start of the season that NG was a starting 22 player (he certainly is now though)



