LOL....Naicos not in the starting 18. I'm sure the AA selectors like to make it about them and be controversial.
Naicos not in the starting 18, that's a p155 take....!!
Naicos not in the starting 18, that's a p155 take....!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If he can only be judged against himself then that’s plainly ridiculous.Mate, I wasn't saying he was shit
But Nick has set a standard for himself the likes we haven't really seen for a long time.
He spent most of the first half of the season being hard tagged every week and was down on his disposal output. His disposal efficiency also suffered as a result of the hard tag.
He then had an incredible patch after the bye.
Then his form dipped a little again with the teams form dip when we started losing games.
That's why I made the post about having a weird feeling none of our players would make it and thought Nick might still sneak in "becuase he's Nick Daicos"
If he gets in the on the bench, that's basically getting in "because he's Nick Daicos"
Mate, I wasn't saying he was shit
But Nick has set a standard for himself the likes we haven't really seen for a long time.
He spent most of the first half of the season being hard tagged every week and was down on his disposal output. His disposal efficiency also suffered as a result of the hard tag.
He then had an incredible patch after the bye.
Then his form dipped a little again with the teams form dip when we started losing games.
That's why I made the post about having a weird feeling none of our players would make it and thought Nick might still sneak in "becuase he's Nick Daicos"
If he gets in the on the bench, that's basically getting in "because he's Nick Daicos"
If he can only be judged against himself then that’s plainly ridiculous.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Taylor led the league in intercept possessions and intercept marks. Hard to look past thatSam Taylor hasn't set the world on fire the past 2 seasons, due to his injuries. Doe's he get in because he plays for the GWS??
Shows how ridiculous it is. Nick has two players hanging off him every week, and still gets more possessions than anybody. but Ed Richards had a better year….? The guy has never been tagged. Tells you everything.

This happened to Pendles as well. He should’ve had another 2 or 3 AA’s.
What snub? Nick was named to the bench. It was between him and Richards for the last centre square midfield spot six of one half dozen the other.No surprise Collingwood players get snubbed in these teams.
Not one Collingwood player was selected in the VFL/AFL team of century, despite the legends we have had over the past 130+ years.....![]()
you could mount a decent argument that any on the bench could have been in the starting 18, its not tokenismYeah, getting in on the bench reeks of token selection but hey, history will still see him as an All-Australian in 2025
No stress Nickolaki
New season starts now. Win the Norm Smith in a Flag and this will disappear into the background
Lmfao are you serious?Yeah, getting in on the bench reeks of token selection but hey, history will still see him as an All-Australian in 2025
No stress Nickolaki
New season starts now. Win the Norm Smith in a Flag and this will disappear into the background
Lmfao are you serious?
Token selection is an outrageous thing to say about the AFLPA MVPSerious about what?
Eight weeks ago - J Daicos, Moore, Elliott and Sidey would all have been pretty close
What snub? Nick was named to the bench. It was between him and Richards for the last centre square midfield spot six of one half dozen the other.
I understand Bont on the bench, he missed 6 or so weeks...
Bont got in on his name. Lets be honest. Pendles didn't get the same luxury when he was at his peak. He got snubbed.I understand Bont on the bench, he missed 6 or so weeks...