Attempted Moustache
Debutant
- Apr 28, 2024
- 104
- 139
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Maybe Sam Walsh can build to these levels of mediocrity one dayTitch and Matt Crouch made careers of doing that very thing tbf.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage âš˝ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Maybe Sam Walsh can build to these levels of mediocrity one dayTitch and Matt Crouch made careers of doing that very thing tbf.
Exactly, had an ordinary game and was still leaps and bounds above your plodders.59% efficiency is ordinary. Simple as that.
Exactly, had an ordinary game and was still leaps and bounds above your plodders.
Exactly, had an ordinary game and was still leaps and bounds above your plodders.
So... 24 effective disposals?Disposal Efficiency was 59.0%....often ignored this stat. 59.0% efficiency isn't good.
Imagine getting 41 touches, 22 contested, 14 clearances and it just being an ordinary average game.
He is a little genius haven’t seen anyone at his level since Ablett jnr.
Nick Daicos's numbers were off the charts. Nothing "ordinary" or "average" about thatImagine getting 41 touches, 22 contested, 14 clearances and it just being an ordinary average game.
Yeah his brother kicked a few in a grandy once.Never heard of the bloke... sounds like he was one heck of a player, though! Did it run in his family, too?
I’d probably give Rankine the votes today though. Daicos second and Pendelbury 3rd his 1st half was absolute classic Pendles.Nick Daicos's numbers were off the charts. Nothing "ordinary" or "average" about that
Even by his own prolific high standards, this was a HUGE game on the stats sheet
However, what really made his game "ordinary" and "average" was his poor kicking
21 kicks, but only 6 of them were effective.... 28.6% kicking efficiency.
Most of his good work was undone and counter-productive.
Here's the Top 20 players on Champion Data's player ratings. Daicos is way down the list.
I doubt anyone has ever racked up 40+ disposals and rated in the low 10's.
Rating.....................(disp)
23.7 Izak Rankine (30)
22.4 Scott Pendlebury (30)
19.8 Jordan Dawson (29)
17.2 Mitchell Hinge (26)
16.9 Matt Crouch (34)
16.4 Jack Crisp (25)
15.6 Lachlan Murphy (14)
15.1 Mark Keane (20)
13.8 Reilly O'Brien (14)
13.1 Darcy Cameron (16)
12.8 Josh Rachele (13)
12.1 Jake Soligo (24)
12.0 John Noble (29)
11.7 Joe Richards (12)
11.6 Rory Laird (22)
11.3 Jordan De Goey (26)
10.9 Finlay Macrae (12)
10.9 Will Hamill (14)
10.6 Brayden Maynard (21)
10.2 Nick Daicos (41)
It will interesting to see on Brownlow night, whether the umps were swayed by the gaudy stats and gave him 3 votes, or if they took into account his poor ball usage.
Look at the last 5 Brownlow winners, Neale, Cripps, Wines, Mitchell, Fyfe... it's pretty obvious they dont care about outside players or ball use and only award votes based on clearance and contested ball. I'd be surprised if the umpires even pay attention to whether a player kicks it to his teammate or the opposition.It will interesting to see on Brownlow night, whether the umps were swayed by the gaudy stats and gave him 3 votes, or if they took into account his poor ball usage.
Yeah, I know.... It's amazing really, when you think about it.Look at the last 5 Brownlow winners, Neale, Cripps, Wines, Mitchell, Fyfe... it's pretty obvious they dont care about outside players or ball use and only award votes based on clearance and contested ball. I'd be surprised if the umpires even pay attention to whether a player kicks it to his teammate or the opposition.
I would give 1 vote to Jordan Dawson.I’d probably give Rankine the votes today though. Daicos second and Pendelbury 3rd his 1st half was absolute classic Pendles.
If my Nan had trunks, she'd be a treeThe better Daicos is, the more it puts an asterisk on their flag imo. literally built a team on being kissed on the father son and the nga old rules. I'll never value their success the same as other teams. arguably their 4 best players are gifts.
Give the dees Nick Daicos to play alongside Oliver and Petracca, Darcy Moore to play alongside May and Lever with Quaynor crumbing and the other Daicos roaming then the dees probably do a 5-peat tbh.
Yikes, that's awful.Nick Daicos's numbers were off the charts. Nothing "ordinary" or "average" about that
Even by his own prolific high standards, this was a HUGE game on the stats sheet
However, what really made his game "ordinary" and "average" was his poor kicking
21 kicks, but only 6 of them were effective.... 28.6% kicking efficiency.
Most of his good work was undone and counter-productive.
Below is the Top 20 players on Champion Data's player ratings for yesterday's game. Daicos is way down the list. I doubt anyone has ever racked up 40+ disposals and rated in the low 10's. Maybe Patrick Cripps has done it a few times before. He is the king of racking up 35 touches, making the commentators jizz in their pants over the way he gets the ball and busts through tackles, but wasting over 50% of his possessions.
Rating.....................(disp)
23.7 Izak Rankine (30)
22.4 Scott Pendlebury (30)
19.8 Jordan Dawson (29)
17.2 Mitchell Hinge (26)
16.9 Matt Crouch (34)
16.4 Jack Crisp (25)
15.6 Lachlan Murphy (14)
15.1 Mark Keane (20)
13.8 Reilly O'Brien (14)
13.1 Darcy Cameron (16)
12.8 Josh Rachele (13)
12.1 Jake Soligo (24)
12.0 John Noble (29)
11.7 Joe Richards (12)
11.6 Rory Laird (22)
11.3 Jordan De Goey (26)
10.9 Finlay Macrae (12)
10.9 Will Hamill (14)
10.6 Brayden Maynard (21)
10.2 Nick Daicos (41)
It will interesting to see on Brownlow night, whether the umps were swayed by the gaudy stats and gave him 3 votes, or if they took into account his poor ball usage.
If my Nan had trunks, she'd be a tree
Why do Melbourne players have such poor sperm?
Yeah his brother kicked a few in a grandy once.
Imagine getting 41 touches, 22 contested, 14 clearances and it just being an ordinary average game.
I’m mean you could always tank for 10 years, get some high end draft picks and win a flag. Thats the way it’s done right?Luck. Which shouldn't come into the equation when deciding flags. And in that sense, pies have had massive luck. Kissed. Well it's not even luck, it's a flawed system which should've been abolished a decade ago.
Do you win those flags in the 50s and 60s without Barassi? You could argue you don't win in 2021 without Viney, stop whinging and acting like you're hard done by. North, St Kilda and Sydney haven't really had any notable father sonsLuck. Which shouldn't come into the equation when deciding flags. And in that sense, pies have had massive luck. Kissed. Well it's not even luck, it's a flawed system which should've been abolished a decade ago.
It's interesting that the clubs who have basically remained competitive and are often contending for a flags this century have had some of the more favourable prodigy roll through the door.I’m mean you could always tank for 10 years, get some high end draft picks and win a flag. Thats the way it’s done right?