Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Good point.Yeah, but is there an "OUT: Suban" meme?
Suban: 1
Clancee: 0
Actually, Suban has only polled Brownlow votes once in his career - last year against GWS.It's all about consistency. Suban has 1 off games that have been outstanding and polled brownlow votes, while other where he has struggled to make an impact (some of these due to injury).
Clancee gives you 7.5/10 every week, while Suban will go 8,4,7,5,9 etc...
Good point.
Actually, Suban has only polled Brownlow votes once in his career - last year against GWS.
Meanwhile Clancee has polled Brownlow votes on five separate occasions, all in 2012.
Perceptions about the two are strikingly different.
Sort of. If their forward line is flooded they are still able to execute some of the most precise kicks to find a free man with very little space. They pick the right angles going inside 50 better than any other team.Whilst the Hawks are great kicks, I think that ability gets inflated by their elite ability to spread. They were able to get so much space against us and Essendon in the first half that the kicks didn't need to be pin point. Once Essendon tightened up their kicking wasn't so elite. It's hard to tell from TV but I imagine Suban spent most of the Hawks game chasing tail and then didn't have the fitness to spread when we had the ball.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Well it was cited by Seppo as an identifier for variability in performance for Suban vs consistency for Clancee. But Clancee has played some very good games. He has played more 20+ disposal, 1+ goal games than Suban has.Umpires aren't exactly a great source to base an opinion on a players performance on.
Umpires aren't exactly a great source to base an opinion on a players performance on.
It is interesting you bring up Clancee Pearce because Nick Suban is yet to have a season as good as Clancee Pearce's 2012. Arguably Clancee Pearce's 2013 would have been better than Suban's had he not finished the season injured.
I don't want Nick Suban to be as good as Ablett. Surely being as good as Clancee Pearce is achievable?
The problem is he only plays like this 2-3 times a year and has his fair share of terrible games too.Suban is easily a best 22 player when on good form. Besides after investing 5 years and 80 odd games in him, it would be stupid to trade him for nothing. Suban is not a star by any stretch but he is not a dud either.
The problem is he only plays like this 2-3 times a year and has his fair share of terrible games too.
He just isn't good enough IMO.
Who would trade for him?
I doubt it they already have enough players as good as Suban.Melbourne!
I hate to say it as I am a massive Suban Fan myself, he needs to be dropped.
That was especially bad.Yep, the dropped mark inside attacking 50 by Suban when we were in front that led to a North goal was the turning point. Should be dropped IMO.