Nicoski or Kennelly

EagleMan87

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Posts
8,135
Likes
1,559
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
WCE
Thread starter #1
Who do you think is better?

Both elevated from the rookie list, both with good pace and footy smarts.

Nicoski has a better and longer kick, while Kennelly gets more of the ball.

Both enjoy a run through the midfield and a long running goal.

So, who do you think?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ted Ed Fred

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Posts
3,705
Likes
5
Location
Horrie Gorringe Stand
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Tasmanian Tigers
#8
Nicoski hands down. Excellent pace, is a tight defender and has a searing left boot :thumbsu: Only downside is that he's barely played over the last year.

As for Kennelly, that talentless paddy will be shipped backed to Oireland if he keeps stuffing up. First gifting us a goal in the GF with that ridiculous attempt at evading Cousins and tonight literally handing us the winning point.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

SBI

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Posts
6,985
Likes
313
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Other Teams
Spurs
#12
If I was to take one for the Bulldogs, Kennelly by a fair margain.
 
Joined
May 30, 2005
Posts
5,691
Likes
3,244
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Socceroos,Wallabies, Glenn McGrath.
#13
I'm completely unbiased when it comes to these two. In my opinion Kennelly is one of the most important players to his team in the AFL. West Coast can do without Nicoski.

The way Kennelly runs off the half back line is fantastic. I'd loooove to have him at Melbourne.

Kennelly for sure.
 
Top Bottom