There were plenty of reviews from people who had hands on time with the system at events and early access to the console, and plenty of them were very positive. The reviews coming out now are still useful, but when you see reviews that are as meaningless as the CNET ones you realise you have to be careful about just writing the system off because of a few tech 'experts'.To be fair, what was the general positivity based on? Hopes and dreams?
well i just find it interesting how people have been able to test and talk about the switch for a while and have been talking about how the games run fine, but its only now that reviews are coming out stating that it lags. Are they testing it well beyond the standard use of the thing to test its limits, and if so is that really relevant? Everything is either it works well or it sucks, why is there such a difference? My bet is that for normal person use it will be fine, and its only when you are really trying to push its capabilities that is falls down a bit.
Just for the record, this is a fanboy.
You seem a bit obsessed about all these negative things coming out, your making it look like only the fanboys will like it and they are wrong for thinking it's good anyway, I suggest just letting people enjoy it for what it is.
Here's another one.
Or maybe now there is no Nintendo controlling what people can and can't say about it so the truth is coming out.
I'm happy with having an opinion but I'm not happy with people making others feel like they don't matter for their opinion. So someone isn't bothered by things as much as you are big deal. I'm only assuming I won't have much trouble with the Switch for how I am thinking of using it but it could very well disappoint me much like the Wii U did
yeah, because nintendo stopped CNET posting a stupid review stating that if you hit the screen with the joycon while it was on the table it would fall over.
Hater? I love Nintendo.
Sure, feel free to show me where that's occurred. I'll wait.
The CNET review was fine.
