No suspensions so far

Papa G

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Posts
20,972
Likes
34,387
Location
The Bitter End
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Thread starter #1
Whelan should not go
Sinclair should not go
Pavich should not go

None were malicious. All were within 5 metres of the ball. If any go the game is in trouble.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Drunken Bum

Team Captain
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Posts
559
Likes
164
Location
*******, Austria
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Other Teams
Footscray
#5
Whelan definately should not go- probably will
Sinclair maybe should go, worst of the three- will go
Pav maybe should go hope not cause in my DT & SC- probably wont go
 

shibz_1989

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Posts
6,199
Likes
269
Location
Subiaco Oval
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Glory, Force, W.Perth
#6
Pav will go coz he wears purple. However, in reality, he had his eyes on the ball and because of his clean record, should not get suspended.
 

rick James

Brownlow Medallist
Suspended
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Posts
22,901
Likes
135
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Post Count: heaps
#7
I don't se the issue with Whelan's hit - he's done the same thing a hundred times, famously on james hird, almost identically, in a final.

FFS - we were winning before that, and St Kilda used it as inspiration to finally beat their bogey side and get a win against their rightful owners.

But the hit itself was awesome and one of the thing I like about AFL (seeing Saints players get injured)
 

Alphanumeric

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Posts
3,168
Likes
52
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Golden State Warriors
#8
Whelan should not go
Sinclair should not go
Pavich should not go

None were malicious. All were within 5 metres of the ball. If any go the game is in trouble.
I reckon all the bumps were fine.

But I reckon the AFL will see it a different way.

Whelan will get 4.
Sinclair will get 4.
Pavlich 1.
 
Top Bottom