What rubbish.
Science currently tells us that random chance has a higher probability than any religions absent creator.
Random chance if there is an infinite amount of time, according to all scientific theories, time wasn't infinite. 13.8 billion years is not very long in cosmic scale. And laws became "laws" just like that. So laws were just a product of accident? prove it to me showing a peer reviewed research paper that within a finite amount of time laws can become laws. I think you place way too much emphasis on science, science is just about observation, nothing more! it will never offer any other explanation outside of that.
Max Planck was born 150 years ago and died 70 years ago.
Planck also stated: “Science advances one funeral at a time.”
This included him. It will definitely include you.
The men of this time were expressing awe and wonder at things that science was just beginning to touch upon. The reason you consistently employ these antiquated quotes is because they allow enough lack of knowledge for you to slip your ideology in to them.
Utter drivel, this comes from a person who thinks Tesla was a mechanical engineer and nothing more than that.You take someone's quote and you use to your advance, what part of "Planck's biography" have you read? What Planck said in his book that ultimately science and spirituality will join hands when we discover behind everything lies "consciousness" which was non local in nature. This has been disproved has it? Spewing ignorance, by googling a few quotes like you been doing all along this thread will result in such uneducated statements
Planck ,Bohr, Bohm, Bose-Einstein models, Heisenberg's basic premise still remains as valid as it was 100 years ago. Planck's basic premise was "Matter does not exist", this has been confirmed time and time again, mostly recently by the rise of the simulation theory. You are just mad, cause you want to use science to confirm your nonsensical religious belief of atheism , when actual science says otherwise.
But i am not getting in another debate with you, maybe learn about science first, then we can talk till then you can keep talking to yourself. This is exhibit B of you quoting someone without know wtf they were on about, i can suggest several books on Planck and specially Neils Bohr/wheeler, maybe you can educate yourself finally, once you do, i will reply again.