Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,170
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Thread starter
- #1,776
Consciousness is a thing, or it isn't. You claim non-locality have no consensus, that means local consciousness must have consensus? its either/or, cannot be both. So if you cannot explain consciousness through locality, then beyond biology explanation if extremely plausible. There is nothing unscientific about that and billions and billions of dollars would not be invested in researching this if there is a "consensus" that brain = consciousness. Despite requesting details about consensus on locality , all you have done is deflect. The fact remains we cannot define consciousness by limited ourselves to the physical only. If you disagree show me the scientific consensus. There is a "lot" of science out there which agrees with my statements above, there is none out there which limits consciousness to the physical, would you like to try again?
You seriously want me to present scientific consensus that consciousness has never been exhibited outside of the human CNS?
Have you honestly been reduced to this?