Probably sees WCE a better club than the hole that calls themselves North Melbourne.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Opinion Non-Crows AFL 9
- Thread starter Mr_Moogle
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Probably sees WCE a better club than the hole that calls themselves North Melbourne.
Oh no doubt. But the demand from the Vic media will be strong. Probably will talk how good it will be when Carlton could reunite him with his best footy mate or something.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 95,669
- 105,212
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Not a fan of ice baths...
El Doederino
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 22, 2018
- 6,482
- 13,934
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Not the baths anyway
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Recently saw McClure at a pub day before the grand final. Guy looked like an absolute flog. His mates were equally as Rooster like and entitled in their demeanour. Stood at the bar for a good 10 minutes, waiting to be noticed as well. Pure definition of a nepo baby…
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
- Oct 13, 2017
- 21,379
- 35,906
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Glenelg, tigers
He really isnt taking this well..
Notice how the flog says nothing about the powa trading their future 1st for some shit picks.. an F1 that geelong wouldve told them they would be demanding for Rat..
Its just pathetic.. he and the scummy club he aligns himself with just expect everyone else to bend over and accept their shit.
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,666
- 48,709
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
He’s right though, Geelong have become arrogant. They want more than 23 for a bloke they didn’t always play. Just listening to Chris Scott from the get go that they won’t trade him.
On the other hand they raid other clubs and try to pay unders.
What Port have offered is fair. I’m happy to see Port suffer, doesn’t change the fact Geelong are acting like arrogant dicks. We’d be spewing if they were doing it to us.
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,666
- 48,709
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Why are Freo letting Lachie Schultz go? Losing Henry as well, bringing no one in. What are they doing? They are going to be ****ed next year
- Oct 2, 2022
- 8,649
- 11,783
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Both out of contract - and they tend to lose two or three players a year, every year.
- Jun 21, 2014
- 11,287
- 12,781
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Shultz is contracted.
dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
Schultz is contracted
- Oct 13, 2017
- 21,379
- 35,906
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Glenelg, tigers
Is there an echo in here?..
Someone wanna let chief know..
Someone wanna let chief know..
dogs105
Sweet Kennels Proprietor
let Chief know
- Oct 2, 2022
- 8,649
- 11,783
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,666
- 48,709
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Just put your faith in knowledgeable posters
- Sep 3, 2018
- 5,614
- 7,477
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Geelong have managed to cultivate and “easy to deal with” reputation but have rarely if ever paid overs for a player or taken unders for theirs.
Has been Wells’ gift
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Oct 2, 2022
- 8,649
- 11,783
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Lol - considering the strike rate around here, that's seems a bad strategy.
Schultz did refuse a contract extension trigger, but it kicks in the end of next year. Has a partner with family health issues.
Henry out of contract.
There's obviously something a bit suss happening there around their player relations. Schultz mentioned that in a podcast, and they've lost a lot of players in recent years, including WA players choosing to leave and move interstate.
- Oct 2, 2022
- 8,649
- 11,783
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It's not Wells anymore though - that seems to be the commentary. Mackie hard to deal with.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,666
- 48,709
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So we were right, you were wrong
I didn’t ask for a history in player retention but why they were letting Schultz go whilst under contract
Barrett claims Gunston wants to return to Hawthorn.
- Oct 2, 2022
- 8,649
- 11,783
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So we were right, you were wrong
I didn’t ask for a history in player retention but why they were letting Schultz go whilst under contract
You asked about Schultz and Henry.
I flippantly responded, then gave you a detailed response.
You'll note, in that detailed response, that I mentioned the illness in his partner's Victorian family, which has been said in media reports as the reason they're letting him go. Little detail has been said publicly about this.
They can also trade from him this year, but now that he's refused his extension trigger he becomes an unrestricted free agent next year.
Many of the players in that enormous list were also under contract.
I hope that satisfactorily answers your questions ...
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,666
- 48,709
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Without making more than it is, I asked about Schultz, given they are losing Henry as well.
- Banned
- #2,124
They were saying not he radio last night that Geelong told Port not to split their future 1st as they wouldn't accept 1 of the resulting picks. Port went ahead and did it anyway.
So to some degree they were framing Port as acting in bad faith
I get Geelong's position, that the Port pick isn't going to get them a player they want this year. The reality is that ER simply isn't worth a F1 (which could well be a pick 8-12 range) in what's shaping to be a deep draft.
At this point in time I'd be ok to see Geelong get SFA
You'd have to wonder if in hindsight they'd have been better off letting ER go last year? Though I can't remember what Port could've offered then though and can't be bothered looking it up
HAHAHAHA
Gunston wants to return to Hawthorn
Gunston wants to return to Hawthorn
- Status
