West Coast 06
Norm Smith Medallist
I have already decided not to watch that game on principle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Some essendon players went to Gallipoli for some documentary to commemorate the 100 year anniversary which will be shown on Anzac Day before and at the match .Lets hope they dont make any comparison between Essendon and the ANZACs on ANZAC day
Some essendon players went to Gallipoli for some documentary to commemorate the 100 year anniversary which will be shown on Anzac Day before and at the match .
What a bunch of flogs
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The best outcome (if indeed TB4 was used) is
* the players remain not guilty
* dank is found guilty
* the findings shows that TB4 was indeed used at Essendon, simply that which players got it was too hard to prove.
That would show that systematic doping went on, but that records were such that it is impossible to show which individual doped
skum usually floats to the top, but this low bottom dwelling stuff even by afl standardsMakes you wonder if the verdict was already known within footy circles
Yes, although it was ruled the substance AOD wasn't banned at the time
From my understanding they got off because they couldn't determine who got the TB4 because their record keeping was so bad.
So the Bombers doped players, they just can't tell you which ones.
Makes you wonder if the verdict was already known within footy circles
Jobe said he got Thymosin, so they know he got it. They are just not trying to find out what Thymosin it is even though they are comfortable it wasn't the legal version, seems strange.
Very, if true I hope ASADA/WADA appeals and they win at CAS.
Personally I cant but help think it will be successful at the CAS. But it would have to be WADA as I understand if ASADA appeal they go to...the AFL anti doping panel again, which I am not sure if they will bother. The real test will come if WADA are unhappy with the result and go straight to CAS.
With the kicker being, if WADA do win the case then backdating for suspensions don't apply and the players would have it apply from whenever they are found guilty.
What sort of evidience could WADA/ASADA use that wouldn't have already been used? Or is it more that a WADA case will not be heard by an "independent" AFL tribunal?
Makes you wonder if the verdict was already known within footy circles
The dots basically are they can't prove which players took what or if all of them took TB4. However i can't see this being resolved without a minimum of jobe going down and losing his brownlow due to his comments.
When did Watson admit to being injected with TB4? In that infamous On The Couch interview he only mentioned AOD9604, which they never got charged with taking because ASADA royally stuffed up by telling them it was legal - did he admit to TG4 somewhere else?