only if they are not looking.gaff i reckon, also heard rumours he kicks puppies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
only if they are not looking.gaff i reckon, also heard rumours he kicks puppies
I do know the MRNA self destructs, but the instructions must be stored somewhere otherwise
there is no purpose.
2 Jabs Astra Zeneca Diddly squat side effects , Slight tenderness around the needle entry point injection 1 , Injection 2 zero. Had a much more severe reaction to Viagra but let's not go there!!These vaccines are some the most studied vaccines in history. Most stop any studies once they have approval. COVID vaccines are so closely monitored the safety data is exceptional.
All drugs have risks, but compared to COVID they are minimal.
Had a much more severe reaction to Viagra but let's not go there!!
We have a three-peat in 2029
2 Jabs Astra Zeneca Diddly squat side effects , Slight tenderness around the needle entry point injection 1 , Injection 2 zero. Had a much more severe reaction to Viagra but let's not go there!!
EFA
Fyfe and Ellyse’s son, Nat Jr., strips the ball from Jack Darling’s son, Antimax, and kicks a goal to win the GF in the 2045.
Please bet responsibly.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
https://www.afl.com.au/news/688165/-coaches-are-too-smart-rocky-says-new-rule-should-be-scrapped
I don't agree. I like the rule, it looks a bit clunky at times especially for set shots on goal but overall I think it has improved the look of the game.
Bahahahahahaha, I just stumbled upon this gold nugget on YouTube -
The moment I eyed the packet of Snakes Alive on the desk, I knew buzz cut would reach for them sooner or later!
The X-Files-themed soundtrack really heightens the tension as he savours that first bite too!
P.S. SOS is a git
Doesnt the AFL only like the sons playing for their fathers club only if they were Victorian clubs?https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/dr...t/news-story/2d62ece85436b5f2d81db6f05a70cc14
This is what the Dogs have to give up to get a father/son player.
— To match the bid, the Dogs use Pick 23 (815 points), Pick 43 (378), Pick 44 (362), Pick 45 (347) and Pick 52 (246), equating to 2148 points that is enough to cover the Giants’ bid.
— As the value of those five picks is more than the discounted Pick 2 value, the Dogs have 134 points left over. This means the last selection the Dogs used to match the Darcy bid (Pick 52) would slide back to Pick 62.
The AFL supports a charming but antiquated notion that a son should be able to play for the same team as his father. Recently they have taken steps to ensure that clubs pay a fair price for them but now I think the pendulum has swung too far.
The points system seems reasonable but the Bulldogs have to hand over 5 picks to get one player. That seems unreasonable, I think if a club took pick 23 and 4 picks between 45 and 55 to the draft there is a pretty good chance they would walk away with 2 solid players. There should be a limit on the number of picks you need to hand over for a father/son. Remember, we all like the idea of sons playing for their Dad’s club. Let’s not hold clubs to ransom for a quirky but endearing facet of our game.
If the Dogs wee bottom 4? They just played in a GF, so they don’t have the points.https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/dr...t/news-story/2d62ece85436b5f2d81db6f05a70cc14
This is what the Dogs have to give up to get a father/son player.
— To match the bid, the Dogs use Pick 23 (815 points), Pick 43 (378), Pick 44 (362), Pick 45 (347) and Pick 52 (246), equating to 2148 points that is enough to cover the Giants’ bid.
— As the value of those five picks is more than the discounted Pick 2 value, the Dogs have 134 points left over. This means the last selection the Dogs used to match the Darcy bid (Pick 52) would slide back to Pick 62.
The AFL supports a charming but antiquated notion that a son should be able to play for the same team as his father. Recently they have taken steps to ensure that clubs pay a fair price for them but now I think the pendulum has swung too far.
The points system seems reasonable but the Bulldogs have to hand over 5 picks to get one player. That seems unreasonable, I think if a club took pick 23 and 4 picks between 45 and 55 to the draft there is a pretty good chance they would walk away with 2 solid players. There should be a limit on the number of picks you need to hand over for a father/son. Remember, we all like the idea of sons playing for their Dad’s club. Let’s not hold clubs to ransom for a quirky but endearing facet of our game.
Douche to Silvagni's left: "Well we do get it..."What a rabble of an organisation..
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/dr...t/news-story/2d62ece85436b5f2d81db6f05a70cc14
This is what the Dogs have to give up to get a father/son player.
— To match the bid, the Dogs use Pick 23 (815 points), Pick 43 (378), Pick 44 (362), Pick 45 (347) and Pick 52 (246), equating to 2148 points that is enough to cover the Giants’ bid.
— As the value of those five picks is more than the discounted Pick 2 value, the Dogs have 134 points left over. This means the last selection the Dogs used to match the Darcy bid (Pick 52) would slide back to Pick 62.
The AFL supports a charming but antiquated notion that a son should be able to play for the same team as his father. Recently they have taken steps to ensure that clubs pay a fair price for them but now I think the pendulum has swung too far.
The points system seems reasonable but the Bulldogs have to hand over 5 picks to get one player. That seems unreasonable, I think if a club took pick 23 and 4 picks between 45 and 55 to the draft there is a pretty good chance they would walk away with 2 solid players. There should be a limit on the number of picks you need to hand over for a father/son. Remember, we all like the idea of sons playing for their Dad’s club. Let’s not hold clubs to ransom for a quirky but endearing facet of our game.
They can simply choose not to metch when Darcy is picked and keep all 6 "valuable"picks They have,can't They?https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/dr...t/news-story/2d62ece85436b5f2d81db6f05a70cc14
This is what the Dogs have to give up to get a father/son player.
— To match the bid, the Dogs use Pick 23 (815 points), Pick 43 (378), Pick 44 (362), Pick 45 (347) and Pick 52 (246), equating to 2148 points that is enough to cover the Giants’ bid.
— As the value of those five picks is more than the discounted Pick 2 value, the Dogs have 134 points left over. This means the last selection the Dogs used to match the Darcy bid (Pick 52) would slide back to Pick 62.
The AFL supports a charming but antiquated notion that a son should be able to play for the same team as his father. Recently they have taken steps to ensure that clubs pay a fair price for them but now I think the pendulum has swung too far.
The points system seems reasonable but the Bulldogs have to hand over 5 picks to get one player. That seems unreasonable, I think if a club took pick 23 and 4 picks between 45 and 55 to the draft there is a pretty good chance they would walk away with 2 solid players. There should be a limit on the number of picks you need to hand over for a father/son. Remember, we all like the idea of sons playing for their Dad’s club. Let’s not hold clubs to ransom for a quirky but endearing facet of our game.
Bahahahahahaha, I just stumbled upon this gold nugget on YouTube -
The moment I eyed the packet of Snakes Alive on the desk, I knew buzz cut would reach for them sooner or later!
The X-Files-themed soundtrack really heightens the tension as he savours that first bite too!
P.S. SOS is a git
Yes they can but they won’t. No way they are letting Darcy go to another club.They can simply choose not to metch when Darcy is picked and keep all 6 "valuable"picks They have,can't They?
I thought the Dogs getting Ugle Hagen had more to do with rule changes for academy picks than anything else?There is no way the Bulldogs are getting held to ransom.
From my perspective the following changes should be made to the bidding system:
1. Scrap the discount altogether.
2. Only allow a club to use three selections to match one selection. Matching a top five pick with one second rounder and a bunch of junk is taking the piss.
There’s no way a club trades pick 2 for pick 23 and four late 2nds / early 3rds. No way in the world.
Because of the AFL not applying the above we’ve lost access to Motlop and Melbourne to Mac Andrew. Both clubs wouldn’t have found it hard to match these selections if all other rules remained in place.