I think that they are expecting some cheap available players to come from the list size reduction - either DFAs or cheap trades. They may look to split one of their first round picks, although I wouldn't if I were them. If the list sizes come down to say 40 total (or 38 + 2 Cat A rookies), then they have 5ish spots, which is not too much to fill. Anyone else going now is traded, so come with value. Although I don't think they'll get full value for Brown or Higgins so those are bizarre calls for me!Just seems very weird, like they are trying to force the AFL to give them 20 picks or something.
They have nothing to trade to get that many players back on the list.
Sad, isn't it?Not even surprised anymore
sh*t, all the best to him.
Wish him the best and challenging times at North, hopefully all involved come out ok from this time and good luck to Corr if he has already signed on the dotted line but he may be reassessing atm
A Richmond vs Geelong GF is disappointing all right, because we should have been there. We'd beaten both of them, FFS.FFS, Richmond v Geelong in the GF. Could not have a worse season result for the sport! OTOH, both Port and Brisbane had a massive home court advantage for the whole year and couldn't get it done, tsk tsk tsk.