Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Non-Lions Discussion 2025

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So point (c) is the relevant one with the free kick in that 2nd quarter. I thought McGrath was trying to make it accidentally-on-purpose slide off the side of his fist so he could pretend he was trying to handball to his team mate.
 
He got pinged for (c). He took possession, turned took a couple of steps and slipped over. Even after slipping over, he had the option to handball to a team mate.

He had time and space to dispose of the football and didn't. it was his own action, slipping over that invited the pressure.
 
18.11 DELIBERATE RUSHED BEHINDS
18.11.1 Spirit and Intention Players shall be encouraged to keep the football in play.
18.11.2 Free Kicks - Deliberate Rushed Behinds A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player from the Defending Team who intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the Attacking Team’s Goal Line or Behind Line or onto one of the Attacking Team’s Goal Posts, and the Player:
(a) is greater than nine metres from the Goal Line or Behind Line;
(b) is not under immediate physical pressure;
(c) has had time and space to dispose of the football; or
(d) from a Ruck contest, hits the football over the Goal Line or Behind Line on the full.

The "or" means that you only need to satisfy one of those four criteria to have a free kick paid against you. He satisfied item (c) and so the free kick was paid.
On that basis I understand why it was paid but the only way he could dispose of it was try to give it to someone who was surrounded by the opposition.

So in hindsight he should have attempted to run and in the process run through the goalposts. Or stuff up the handball. He just wasn't that flash in disguising his true intentions.

Going to be a talking point and it's just my view that that's a tough rule in the circumstances he was in.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He got pinged for (c). He took possession, turned took a couple of steps and slipped over. Even after slipping over, he had the option to handball to a team mate.

He had time and space to dispose of the football and didn't. it was his own action, slipping over that invited the pressure.
I see all that.

But if he slipped over when he was going to dispose of it and the opposition was closing in isn't he allowed to take it through ?

Ah I see. He could've disposed of it after he slipped over.

Well he should've dropped it , and knocked it through as the opposition was about to pounce.

Can of worms.
 
Rumour out there that Luke Jackson's misses had a public argument on her FB page with some Jackson's family this morning, and then some of Jackson's "ex" mates jumped in. There are some screen shots of the since deleted argument around.

Jackson back to Melbourne may be more on than has been discussed so far.
What has made you follow the WA clubs so closely? For a long time I assume you must live in WA
 
What has made you follow the WA clubs so closely? For a long time I assume you must live in WA
lol.

I decided to follow WC list rebuild a year before their crash and burn because it was obvious that cliff was coming. And, while I support the Lions, it's freaking boring for a draft nuffie when it's all high end father sons and academy kids. And WC's rebuild is as close to rebuilding from ground zero as we'll see.

And WC BigFooty has enough of a infatuation with Freo, that I don't need to read both boards to follow what is happening at both. If there's a scandal at Freo, it'll get discussed on the WC board.
 
lol.

I decided to follow WC list rebuild a year before their crash and burn because it was obvious that cliff was coming. And, while I support the Lions, it's freaking boring for a draft nuffie when it's all high end father sons and academy kids. And WC's rebuild is as close to rebuilding from ground zero as we'll see.

And WC BigFooty has enough of a infatuation with Freo, that I don't need to read both boards to follow what is happening at both. If there's a scandal at Freo, it'll get discussed on the WC board.

Thank you for all you do Mr Briz
 

Remove this Banner Ad

West Coast had the choice of taking Hawthorns or Carltons 2025 full set of draft picks (as the Hawks held their own full set, plus held Carltons 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks) in the Barras trade.

They chose the Hawks picks.

Carlton are a Patrick Cripps injury away from finishing bottom 6.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

On the deliberate call, in the GWS/Collingwood game last week, a player handballed the ball directly to another player who stepped over the line 'under pressure'. They were then able to immediately take the kick out under no pressure and within a few seconds the ball was in the middle of the ground.
First, was as deliberate as last night. Second, I would like to see the flags waved before the kick out if the defenders take the ball over the line.
 
On the deliberate call, in the GWS/Collingwood game last week, a player handballed the ball directly to another player who stepped over the line 'under pressure'. They were then able to immediately take the kick out under no pressure and within a few seconds the ball was in the middle of the ground.
First, was as deliberate as last night. Second, I would like to see the flags waved before the kick out if the defenders take the ball over the line.
The call was correct to how the rules are written - he got done on point c rather than point b (which is the one that everyone knows).

Screenshot_20250314-212239-905.png

(Written as an or list so any one of those is a free against)

Don't mind mandating a slower return after a deliberate behind though.
 
The call was correct to how the rules are written - he got done on point c rather than point b (which is the one that everyone knows).

View attachment 2249989

(Written as an or list so any one of those is a free against)

Don't mind mandating a slower return after a deliberate behind though.

But did he really have time and space and that is why i don't believe (C) should have been considered.
I believe that (C) was included for players that obviously have time and space and under no immediate pressure.

The original reason the whole rule came into place was players just walking back over the line in that GF.
I can't remember which team it was maybe the Hawks?.

I usually support the umpires in many of the grey arears of the rules, but i think that was the wrong call.

The game has so many grey arears it's no surprise in what some umpires will pay, and others don't.

However, i don't believe most umpires would have paid a free in that situation.

If it was an important close game or GF and that was paid it would be all over the media, but it is round 1.
Now we have a situation in that the players get more confused and get more nervous around that area of the ground.

I doubt we would be talking about it much at all if it was recorded as a rushed behind, common sense would prevail.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Non-Lions Discussion 2025

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top