Europe Norman Shelleys famous Churchill impersonations

Remove this Banner Ad

little graham

Brownlow Medallist
10k Posts
Sep 18, 2013
17,752
11,820
AFL Club
Adelaide
Should of said "Never in the field of human conflict has so much death and destruction been caused to so many, to so few"

In 1990 an American speech research group called Sensimetrics tested 20 of the speeches that Decca and EMI sell under Churchill's name. The speech patterns on three recordings were found to be different. They were the disputed speeches originally made in Parliament in 1940: the Dunkirk speech, the 'Finest Hour' speech, and the one made on 13 May, when Churchill promised 'blood, toil, tears and sweat'.


http://www.theguardian.com/media/2000/oct/29/uknews.theobserver

So what other tricks did the british pull in that war?
 
So what other tricks did the british pull in that war?
I dont think we can blame the British. Once Decca were involved there is no doubt a stuff up was bound to happen.
I mean how can anyone trust Decca considering they rejected The Beatles.

The one thing that we can blame the British for is the Munich agreement as this apparently forced the USSR into the Molotov Ribbentrop pact and the poor (am I doing this right?) USSR was with that forced into a pact with the Nazis and took that pact of friendship so seriously they both invaded Poland and with that they never ever thought that the Nazis would break that pact. I know this became I read Putan say so recently. Kind of reminds me of that Fawlty moment when the Germans said he started it but Basil retorted with a no he didn't as they had invaded Poland.

Look at the bright side those appalling British gave you and I the language that you and I both periodically butcher so that you and I can have a nice chummy bitch about the evils they perpetrated on the world.
 
I dont think we can blame the British. Once Decca were involved there is no doubt a stuff up was bound to happen.
I mean how can anyone trust Decca considering they rejected The Beatles.

The one thing that we can blame the British for is the Munich agreement as this apparently forced the USSR into the Molotov Ribbentrop pact and the poor (am I doing this right?) USSR was with that forced into a pact with the Nazis and took that pact of friendship so seriously they both invaded Poland and with that they never ever thought that the Nazis would break that pact. I know this became I read Putan say so recently. Kind of reminds me of that Fawlty moment when the Germans said he started it but Basil retorted with a no he didn't as they had invaded Poland.

Look at the bright side those appalling British gave you and I the language that you and I both periodically butcher so that you and I can have a nice chummy bitch about the evils they perpetrated on the world.

Don't get offended if someone ever said Rigby deserved what he got, their just being arrogant campaigners like you.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

they pulled a lot of fast ones, but boy ain't you glad that they did! Imagine if we had lost.
But England did lose. Only a few years ago did england Finnish paying off its debt to America for that war. They still have american bases and nuclear weapons on thier land. Were forced to use agent orange in Malaya and death camps in Kenya to keep their economy propped up so they could pay their debt for a war Churchill pushed.

If it wasn't for the fake Churchill, relying on actors, bankers and grog, England might of accepted a treaty with Germany. England might not of pushed Poland into war with Germany. Remember Churchill is attributed a lot of blame for ww1 and especially Galiipoli, is recognized as a war monger.
 
But England did lose. Only a few years ago did england Finnish paying off its debt to America for that war. They still have american bases and nuclear weapons on thier land. Were forced to use agent orange in Malaya and death camps in Kenya to keep their economy propped up so they could pay their debt for a war Churchill pushed.

If it wasn't for the fake Churchill, relying on actors, bankers and grog, England might of accepted a treaty with Germany. England might not of pushed Poland into war with Germany. Remember Churchill is attributed a lot of blame for ww1 and especially Galiipoli, is recognized as a war monger.

So according to you England lost WWII because they had to borrow from the US to finance their war effort.
 
So according to you England lost WWII because they had to borrow from the US to finance their war effort.
This is your irrational reaction to reality.


Its a widley regarded fact that ww2 signaled the end of the British empire. If thats not losing, with everything else, then what is? Imagine what they would have if they didn't have to use actors to convince the public to send them into debt for half a century, to fight a country that respected the law and order the empire brought to the trades routes?
 
Its a widley regarded fact that ww2 signaled the end of the British empire. If thats not losing, with everything else, then what is? Imagine what they would have if they didn't have to use actors to convince the public to send them into debt for half a century, to fight a country that respected the law and order the empire brought to the trades routes?

Britain was been able to hold democratic elections without the direct interference of foreign powers telling the populus who to vote for. The empire was an outdate form of thinking.
As Ghandi said "100,00 Englishmen simply cannot wish to control 350,000,000 Indians if those Indians refuse to co-operate.
 
So let me get this straight. I am an arrogant rude word because I highlight an extreme anti British sentiment to the point that it is so anti British that Nazi Germany apparently "respected the law and order the empire brought to trade routes"?

Churchill was a drunk, a liar, a war monger, anti semetic and required actors to con the general public who would fight his crusades against socialism. You are an arrogant rude word if you label anyone who points that out as anti british. Churchill wasted thousands of lives in turkey to restrain socialism in ww1.

churchill-heavenhell7.jpg


I'm not sure if i should use that because the man is a pathological liar, perhaps an actor actually said it? or one of the bankers that bank rolled him.

Winston_Churchill_Socialism_01_275px.jpg


Again, we have no idea if he really said this as result of all the bullshit he did. What we do know is he had no regard for Australian lives with the invasion of suvla bay.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Churchill was a drunk, a liar, a war monger, anti semetic and required actors to con the general public who would fight his crusades against socialism. You are an arrogant rude word if you label anyone who points that out as anti british. Churchill wasted thousands of lives in turkey to restrain socialism in ww1.

Socialism had nothing to do with Gallipoli.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top