Rumour North Melbourne FC in disarray?

[Snake_Baker]

"too" fast.

Maybe your brain is overloaded? Those 3-letter words can get tricky.

 

[Bazzar]

"too" fast.

Maybe your brain is overloaded? Those 3-letter words can get tricky.

Aren't you the clever one.

 

[tigerwill]

"too" fast.

Maybe your brain is overloaded? Those 3-letter words can get tricky.

You grammar nazi you.

 

[Snake_Baker]

If the AFL wants it, it will happen.
North Melbourne are not a big enough club to play ball with the AFL, all the AFL need to do is choose to not prop up North in 10 years, and they will have to do what the AFL wants.

The AFL could relocate the N.M.F.C. no more than they could relocate the Green Bay Packers.

The simplest black and white concepts just continually fly over your head.

Does your club constitution cover the club folding?

Yes.

If Richmond folds, could they relocate? D'Oh, there's no Richmond left to relocate! Doofus.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

You grammar nazi you.

You left out the comma between nazi and you.

But hey, it's a better post than the feeble attempt at cleverness that you originally went with.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Aren't you the clever one.

There should be a question mark at the end, not a full stop.

 

[Snake_Baker]

There should be a question mark at the end, not a full stop.

Hahahahahahaha

Aaaaaah Richmond supporters. What would we do without them?

 

[tigerwill]

Yeah, nice hypocrisy. It's only a couple of pages back where I called your bullshit and you responded by deflecting.

Cool story. You called nothing. You waffled on without answering anything of "context".
I already replied to your waffle. Get over yourself.

 

[tigerwill]

Hahahahahahaha

So you're still perusing this thread. Where's the answers?
Snake_Baker gone to water yet again or just the usual troll attempt?

 

[tigerwill]

There should be a question mark at the end, not a full stop.

It was a statement not a question

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Cool story. You called nothing. You waffled on without answering anything of "context".
I already replied to your waffle. Get over yourself.

No, you avoided replying. Your response relating to us topping up with older players "all the time" was to quote a player who is about to enter his 4th year on the list, and another player who was delisted last year.

It is indicative of your low intelligence to trot out the ignorant opinions of Terry Wallace et al, who are too lazy to do any research for their jobs, and pretend they're something you've assessed and considered.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

It was a statement not a question

Keep digging, fool. You just further demonstrated ignorance.

 

[tigerwill]

Well time to humour you.

The Adelaide/Richmond Time line "facts" are quoted from which source? Or did you just type them up
When in October 1990 was the fee paid?
How much was Adelaides sub licence?
What amount did Adelaide pay directly to Richmond?
How much of the sub licence was paid directly to the clubs or was it via the AFL?
How much was distributed to all clubs and when was it paid?
Did north receive the same amount at the same time?

If you stand by your "statement" answer the above. Doubtful you will.
Just another deflection from you of course and a regurgitation of your usual lies.

Snake_Baker . Just in case you blinked and missed it.

When in October 1990 was the fee paid?
How much was Adelaides sub licence?
What amount did Adelaide pay directly to Richmond?
How much of the sub licence was paid directly to the clubs or was it via the AFL?
How much was distributed to all clubs and when was it paid?
Did north receive the same amount at the same time?

 

[Snake_Baker]

No, you avoided replying. Your response relating to us topping up with older players "all the time" was to quote a player who is about to enter his 4th year on the list, and another player who was delisted last year.

It is indicative of your low intelligence to trot out the ignorant opinions of Terry Wallace et al, who are too lazy to do any research for their jobs.

Quote? Christ, they were stupid enough to actually employ the bloke!

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Quote? Christ, they were stupid enough to actually employ the bloke!

Loved his 2004 draft effort: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_AFL_draft#2004_national_draft

1,000 monkeys with 1,000 typewriters couldn't f*** up 5 picks in the top 20.

(as an aside, North have never received (or even requested) a priority pick. Not ever. Look at the three clubs who got such charity that year).

 

[tigerwill]

Snake_Baker . Just in case you blinked and missed it.

When in October 1990 was the fee paid?
How much was Adelaides sub licence?
What amount did Adelaide pay directly to Richmond?
How much of the sub licence was paid directly to the clubs or was it via the AFL?
How much was distributed to all clubs and when was it paid?
Did north receive the same amount at the same time?

Found any answers yet?

 

[tigerwill]

Loved his 2004 draft effort: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_AFL_draft#2004_national_draft

1,000 monkeys with 1,000 typewriters couldn't f*** up 5 picks in the top 20.

(as an aside, North have never received (or even requested) a priority pick. Not ever. Look at the three clubs who got such charity that year).

Too busy topping up.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Loved his 2004 draft effort: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_AFL_draft#2004_national_draft

1,000 monkeys with 1,000 typewriters couldn't f*** up 5 picks in the top 20.

(as an aside, North have never received (or even requested) a priority pick. Not ever. Look at the three clubs who got such charity that year).

Put a hat on said monkey, with the words "The List Manager" emblazoned across it, and morons line up for miles to quote it.

1,000 monkeys with 1,000 typewriters couldn't f*** up 5 picks in the top 20.

PMSL. Brilliant. My new sig.

 

[tigerwill]

Put a hat on said monkey, with the words "The List Manager" emblazoned across it, and morons line up for miles to quote it.

Supply the quote.
One thing we can thank the"list manager" for was to get us Dustin Martin. You know, the bloke who you offered mega $millions to but still knocked you back.

Now how about you stop deflecting and provide some answers to the "statement you stand by"

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Supply the quote.
One thing we can thank the"list manager" for was to get us Dustin Martin. You know, the bloke who you offered mega $millions to but still knocked you back.

Now how about you stop deflecting and provide some answers to the "statement you stand by"

Another lie. Do you really think people are stupid enough to believe your crap? It's obvious you make things up in the hope of no-one calling you on it. Martin was drafted in November 2009. Wallace quit (was pushed) in mid-2009.

 

[tigerwill]

Another lie. Do you really think people are stupid enough to believe your crap? It's obvious you make things up in the hope of no-one calling you on it. Martin was drafted in November 2009. Wallace quit (was pushed) in mid-2009.

Settle petal. Either you're too stupid to know or you don't know the history behind it.
Maybe it's time for you to go play in the sandpit. You're just showing you can't converse with adults, now run along.

Snake_Baker we're still waiting on your answers

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Settle petal. Either you're too stupid to know or you don't know the history behind it.
Maybe it's time for you to go play in the sandpit. You're just showing you can't converse with adults, now run along.

Snake_Baker we're still waiting on your answers

There's no Martin-Wallace history, you're making it up. Wallace was already on the nose at Richmond before the 2009 season, and he finally walked in the middle of the year. Surely you remember it.

Martin was linked with a number of clubs at draft time, like top 5 talent is every year. Terry Wallace had nothing to do with him ending at Richmond.

Stick with facts. You'll post less, and look less stupid.

 

[tigerwill]

There's no Martin-Wallace history, you're making it up. Wallace was already on the nose at Richmond before the 2009 season, and he finally walked in the middle of the year. Surely you remember it.

Martin was linked with a number of clubs at draft time, like top 5 talent is every year. Terry Wallace had nothing to do with him ending at Richmond.

Stick with facts. You'll post less, and look less stupid.

Know the lead up to it numb nuts. You obviously know nothing.
I never stated Wallace drafted him. It totally went over your head.
Every Richmond supporter knows the story and have a laugh about.
Now run along and play.

Calling Snake_Baker, found the answers yet or is it you just can't reply?

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Supply the quote.
One thing we can thank the"list manager" for was to get us Dustin Martin. You know, the bloke who you offered mega $millions to but still knocked you back.

Now how about you stop deflecting and provide some answers to the "statement you stand by"

Know the lead up to it numb nuts. You obviously know nothing.
I never stated Wallace drafted him. It totally went over your head.
Every Richmond supporter knows the story and have a laugh about.
Now run along and play.

Calling Snake_Baker, found the answers yet or is it you just can't reply?

The most you can say is that TW was one of dozens of football people who was interested in Dusty in the year of his draft. And hindsight tells us that only Melbourne got it demonstrably wrong in that draft.

He didn't engineer your draft pick 3, he didn't engineer Melbourne taking two less talented footballers first. He didn't get Martin to Richmond, it fell that way.

No doubt TW claims the kudos at various speaking functions when he can, probably even talks up how he got Dusty on board, but really, you'd have to be gullible to believe that.

 

[Ocker]

So, re the OP and purpose for thread, are north in disarray?