Not Worth A Thread - Random Bulldog Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
AFL FANTASY THE PROGRESSION (Plus short assessment)

Macrae: ($732,000) to ($789,000) = Elite year.
Bontempelli: ($706,000) to ($648,000) = Played hurt.


Hunter: ($634,000) to ($727,000) = Elite year.
Dahlhaus: ($624,000) to ($503,000) = Inconsistent year.
McLean: ($603,000) to ($566,000) = Important at times.


Adams: ($513,000) to ($440,000) = Lowered output, injury ?
Biggs: ($542,000) to ($437,000) = Passed by some faster newer vehicles.
Campbell: ($509,000) to ($509,000) = The brussel sprout of the Bulldogs.
Daniel: ($530,000) to ($558,000) = Found his mojo late after struggling.
Dunkley: ($517,000) to ($716,000) = Positional elevation, success story.
Johannisen: ($535,000) to ($556,000) = Lost and found year.
Jong: ($505,000) to ($371,000) = Paddled a little.
Liberatore: ($507,000) to ($469,000) = Where does he fit ?
Picken: ($536,000) to ($536,000) = Tough year hope he is ok.
Suckling: ($552,000) to ($589,000) = Even got abused in the stands, but vital.
Wallis: ($526,000) to ($534,000) = In and Out at times, but plays his role.


Boyd: ($451,000) to ($418,000) = Regressed a little.
Crozier: ($467,000) to ($552,000) = Started slow, but boy can he go.
Dale: ($475,000) to ($392,000) = Poor year ended early with navicular injury.
Dickson: ($446,000) to ($319,000) = Lucky to get an extension.
Honey-Church: ($462,000) to ($420,000) = Invigorated by late hyphen.
Redpath: ($452,000) to ($420,000) = Injured knee has had enough.
Roughead: ($483,000) to ($459,000) = Phoned it in a bit.
C.Smith: ($443,000) to ($443,000) = Knees are cooked unfortunately.
Trengove: ($446,000) to ($522,000) = Settled in late and thrived.
Williams: ($437,000) to ($537,000) = Becoming a player, like the boy.
Wood: ($412,000) to ($388,000) = Lost and found year


Cordy: ($394,000) to ($311,000) = Fractured skull late, back to defence.
Lipinski: ($322,000) to ($408,000) = Baby steps, positional uncertainty.
Schache: ($326,000) to ($377,000) = Showed a lot of potential.
Webb: ($318,000) to ($319,000) = Neck an issue, but treading water.
Young: ($332,000) to ($328,000) = Perplexing year, played a lot of VFL.


Morris: ($284,000) to ($256,000) = Lucky to get an extension.
Naughton: ($254,000) to ($356,000) = Awesome first year for a tall.
Richards: ($240,000) to ($286,000) = Overexposed first year, good at times.
Roberts: ($266,000) to ($270,000) = Exposed by a first year player.
R.Smith: ($256,000) to ($245,000) = Long way back sadly.


Collins: ($170,000) to ($170,000) = Gave us Colons, but little else.
English: ($187,000) to ($425,000) = Could be the real great white hope, pasty white.
Gowers: ($170,000) to ($395,000) = Repaid the faith in a poor forward line.
Greene: ($170,000) to ($285,000) = Lucky to play, but something to work with.
Lynch: ($170,000) to ($244,000) = Showed a bit which was vital after injuries.
Mullenger-McHugh: ($170,000) to ($170,000) = The rookie revolving door claims another victim.
Porter: ($170,000) to ($170,000) = As Goldberg used to say, you're next.

Well there you go, a warts and all expose from go to whoa.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yojimbo said:
AFL FANTASY THE PROGRESSION (Plus short assessment)

Macrae: ($732,000) to ($789,000) = Elite year.
Bontempelli: ($706,000) to ($648,000) = Played hurt.


Hunter: ($634,000) to ($727,000) = Elite year.
Dahlhaus: ($624,000) to ($503,000) = Inconsistent year.
McLean: ($603,000) to ($566,000) = Important at times.


Adams: ($513,000) to ($440,000) = Lowered output, injury ?
Biggs: ($542,000) to ($437,000) = Passed by some faster newer vehicles.
Campbell: ($509,000) to ($509,000) = The brussel sprout of the Bulldogs.
Daniel: ($530,000) to ($558,000) = Found his mojo late after struggling.
Dunkley: ($517,000) to ($716,000) = Positional elevation, success story.
Johannisen: ($535,000) to ($556,000) = Lost and found year.
Jong: ($505,000) to ($371,000) = Paddled a little.
Liberatore: ($507,000) to ($469,000) = Where does he fit ?
Picken: ($536,000) to ($536,000) = Tough year hope he is ok.
Suckling: ($552,000) to ($589,000) = Even got abused in the stands, but vital.
Wallis: ($526,000) to ($534,000) = In and Out at times, but plays his role.


Boyd: ($451,000) to ($418,000) = Regressed a little.
Crozier: ($467,000) to ($552,000) = Started slow, but boy can he go.
Dale: ($475,000) to ($392,000) = Poor year ended early with navicular injury.
Dickson: ($446,000) to ($319,000) = Lucky to get an extension.
Honey-Church: ($462,000) to ($420,000) = Invigorated by late hyphen.
Redpath: ($452,000) to ($420,000) = Injured knee has had enough.
Roughead: ($483,000) to ($459,000) = Phoned it in a bit.
C.Smith: ($443,000) to ($443,000) = Knees are cooked unfortunately.
Trengove: ($446,000) to ($522,000) = Settled in late and thrived.
Williams: ($437,000) to ($537,000) = Becoming a player, like the boy.
Wood: ($412,000) to ($388,000) = Lost and found year


Cordy: ($394,000) to ($311,000) = Fractured skull late, back to defence.
Lipinski: ($322,000) to ($408,000) = Baby steps, positional uncertainty.
Schache: ($326,000) to ($377,000) = Showed a lot of potential.
Webb: ($318,000) to ($319,000) = Neck an issue, but treading water.
Young: ($332,000) to ($328,000) = Perplexing year, played a lot of VFL.


Morris: ($284,000) to ($256,000) = Lucky to get an extension.
Naughton: ($254,000) to ($356,000) = Awesome first year for a tall.
Richards: ($240,000) to ($286,000) = Overexposed first year, good at times.
Roberts: ($266,000) to ($270,000) = Exposed by a first year player.
R.Smith: ($256,000) to ($245,000) = Long way back sadly.


Collins: ($170,000) to ($170,000) = Gave us Colons, but little else.
English: ($187,000) to ($425,000) = Could be the real great white hope, pasty white.
Gowers: ($170,000) to ($395,000) = Repaid the faith in a poor forward line.
Greene: ($170,000) to ($285,000) = Lucky to play, but something to work with.
Lynch: ($170,000) to ($244,000) = Showed a bit which was vital after injuries.
Mullenger-McHugh: ($170,000) to ($170,000) = The rookie revolving door claims another victim.
Porter: ($170,000) to ($170,000) = As Goldberg used to say, you're next.

Well there you go, a warts and all expose from go to whoa.
Click to expand...
Good summary. I've never delved too much into fantasy footy type stuff and I know it needs to be taken with a large grain of salt, but Campbell $509 and Cordy $311? That's way too far out of whack.
 
bobs head soup said:
Good summary. I've never delved too much into fantasy footy type stuff and I know it needs to be taken with a large grain of salt, but Campbell $509 and Cordy $311? That's way too far out of whack.
Click to expand...
True, but if you compare Cordy with say Dylan Grimes from Richmond ($328,000) starting price then it makes more sense.
There are lots of factors that effect a players rating from year to year. Rucks like Campbell get points for their hit outs
which can throw the results, tacklers get four points a tackle which makes guys like Devon Smith and even Josh Dunkley
attractive fantasy options.
 
If you picked real teams based on Fantasy Football you'd get smashed.
Defenders get shortchanged. Stat-padders (yes, with a hyphen) get over-rewarded.
 
bobs head soup said:
Good summary. I've never delved too much into fantasy footy type stuff and I know it needs to be taken with a large grain of salt, but Campbell $509 and Cordy $311? That's way too far out of whack.
Click to expand...
Fantasy footy rewards stats. So defensive players, taggers, role players etc. don't score well.
 
dogwatch said:
If you picked real teams based on Fantasy Football you'd get smashed.
Defenders get shortchanged. Stat-padders (yes, with a hyphen) get over-rewarded.
Click to expand...
Come on dog-watch you love the hyphen, no one is picking teams based on fantasy football, but a separated list based on $100,000
dollar incremates is interesting if you look at all the teams. Beats the A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, usual ratings. It's all part of the bigger
picture.
 
Yojimbo said:
Come on dog-watch you love the hyphen, no one is picking teams based on fantasy football, but a separated list based on $100,000
dollar incremates is interesting if you look at all the teams. Beats the A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, usual ratings. It's all part of the bigger
picture.
Click to expand...
Yeah, mildly interesting ... but don't try reading anything into it. Fantasy is an apt title.
When Roberts is worth more than Morris and Roughead is nearly twice Moz's value you know you're not in the real world.
 
Can anyone help me out? I've been passed a few prelim final tickets and I don't actually want them. What's the best/safest way to go about selling them? Is there an official transfer site or should I just use gumtree/PayPal?
 
Dale4captain said:
Can anyone help me out? I've been passed a few prelim final tickets and I don't actually want them. What's the best/safest way to go about selling them? Is there an official transfer site or should I just use gumtree/PayPal?
Click to expand...
You need a duffel coat and a tam hat, then the buyer will come to you. Some nice knock off Rolex might also interest the discerning customer, with knock off perfume as a respectable alternative however.

You are most welcome.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

ThirdLegUp said:
You need a duffel coat and a tam hat, then the buyer will come to you. Some nice knock off Rolex might also interest the discerning customer, with knock off perfume as a respectable alternative however.

You are most welcome.
Click to expand...
Hahahaha. Very helpful. Side note - if anyone wants a couple of prelim tickets for $30 a piece, hit me up.
 
Bulldogs 2018 (A study of age demographic versus results)

Round 1: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 8, (95-99) x 10.

Round 2: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 13.

Round 3: WIN (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 4: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 11.

Round 5: LOSS (85-90) x 3, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 14.

Round 6: WIN (85-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 7: WIN (85-90) x 1, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 14.

Round 8: WIN (85-90) x 1, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 15.

Round 9: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 10: LOSS (85-90) x 5, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 12.

Round 11: LOSS (82-90) x 6, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 11.

Round 13: LOSS (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 14: LOSS (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 14.

Round 15: WIN (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 16: LOSS (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 17: LOSS (82-90) x 3, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 12.

Round 18: LOSS (82-90) x 3, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 12.

Round 19: LOSS (82-90) x 3, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 12.

Round 20: WIN (82-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 21: WIN (82-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 22: WIN (82-90) x 5, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 11.

Round 23: LOSS (82-90) x 4, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 13.

Sorry dog-watch more numbers to peruse, anyone wishing to compare with the four prelim teams their
break up is available in the Finals Thread (Bulldog supporters only) for those not interested this has
been another episode of Yojimbo's crappy stats where you are only as good as your last game.
 
Yojimbo said:
Bulldogs 2018 (A study of age demographic versus results)

Round 1: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 8, (95-99) x 10.

Round 2: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 13.

Round 3: WIN (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 4: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 11.

Round 5: LOSS (85-90) x 3, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 14.

Round 6: WIN (85-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 7: WIN (85-90) x 1, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 14.

Round 8: WIN (85-90) x 1, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 15.

Round 9: LOSS (85-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 10: LOSS (85-90) x 5, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 12.

Round 11: LOSS (82-90) x 6, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 11.

Round 13: LOSS (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 14: LOSS (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 14.

Round 15: WIN (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 16: LOSS (82-90) x 2, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 13.

Round 17: LOSS (82-90) x 3, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 12.

Round 18: LOSS (82-90) x 3, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 12.

Round 19: LOSS (82-90) x 3, (91-94) x 7, (95-99) x 12.

Round 20: WIN (82-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 21: WIN (82-90) x 4, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 12.

Round 22: WIN (82-90) x 5, (91-94) x 6, (95-99) x 11.

Round 23: LOSS (82-90) x 4, (91-94) x 5, (95-99) x 13.

Sorry dog-watch more numbers to peruse, anyone wishing to compare with the four prelim teams their
break up is available in the Finals Thread (Bulldog supporters only) for those not interested this has
been another episode of Yojimbo's crappy stats where you are only as good as your last game.
Click to expand...
Any correlation between wins and age? Or between wins/losses and our avge age vs the opposition's avge age? Do you have games played (experience) coming into each round? (Hint: you could find these in match preview, game day or post mortem threads for many of the rounds this year.)
 
dogwatch said:
Any correlation between wins and age? Or between wins/losses and our avge age vs the opposition's avge age? Do you have games played (experience) coming into each round? (Hint: you could find these in match preview, game day or post mortem threads for many of the rounds this year.)
Click to expand...
Mostly I found it was less of the age demographic and more of who played well scenario. There was also a massive balance versus age
demographic battle that raged through the whole season when we got it wrong we stank. Our Round 1 team had one of the best age
demographics yet suffered one of if not the biggest losses of the year the balance however was putrid tall to small. I don't post the
good stuff dog-watch, but it is good.
 
Winning Dogs (The consistent names) : Bulldogs 2018 (8 Wins)

Lachie Hunter = 8 Wins
Jason Johannisen = 8 Wins
Toby McLean = 8 Wins
Ed Richards = 8 Wins
Josh Dunkley = 8 Wins
Mitch Wallis = 8 Wins
Aaron Naughton = 8 Wins

Jackson Macrae = 7 Wins
Marcus Bontempelli = 7 Wins
Caleb Daniel = 7 Wins
Billy Gowers = 7 Wins
Hayden Crozier = 7 Wins
Lin Jong = 7 Wins
Patrick Lipinski = 7 Wins
Zaine Cordy = 7 Wins

Dahlhaus, Williams = 5 Wins

Suckling, Lynch, Schache, Morris, Dale, Dickson, Trengove = 4 Wins
 
Last edited:
Yojimbo said:
Winning Dogs (The consistent names) : Bulldogs 2018 (8 Wins)

Lachie Hunter = 8 Wins
Jason Johannisen = 8 Wins
Toby McLean = 8 Wins
Ed Richards = 8 Wins
Josh Dunkley = 8 Wins
Mitch Wallis = 8 Wins
Aaron Naughton = 8 Wins

Jackson Macrae = 7 Wins
Marcus Bontempelli = 7 Wins
Caleb Daniel = 7 Wins
Billy Gowers = 7 Wins
Hayden Crozier = 7 Wins
Lin Jong = 7 Wins
Patrick Lipinski = 7 Wins
Zaine Cordy = 7 Wins

Dahlhaus, Williams = 5 Wins

Suckling, Lynch, Schache, Morris, Dale, Dickson = 4 Wins
Click to expand...
Who has the highest winning ratio (per games played)?
 
Snarls Barkley said:
Would surely have to be Lin Jong with a 7-3 winning record, which included a 6 game winning streak to finish the season.

Strange contrast to 2016 where Bulldogs teams that did not include Lin Jong went 10-0.
Click to expand...
Jong rarely makes the first page of google, do you want the player rankings in the wins ?

Jackson Macrae:
Round 3: 3rd
Round 6: 1st
Round 7: 1st
Round 8: 1st
Round 15: DNP
Round 20: 2nd
Round 21: 3rd
Round 22: 3rd

Just a tease.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

X_box_X
Autopsy Free kick against Bulldogs
Replies
18
Views
986
DognBones
DognBones
Norm De Guerre
Autopsy The not even The Bont, Libbas and Jones' heroics can drag us over the line against the cats thread
15 16 17 18 19
Replies
462
Views
18K
_Mike_
_Mike_
_Mike_
  • Sticky
Mod. Notice Welcome Fossie32 to the Bulldogs Community Leader role
Replies
5
Views
155
Bulldogs85
Bulldogs85
_Mike_
Mod. Notice Seeking EOI for Bulldogs board community leaders
Replies
2
Views
553
grassman75
grassman75
weltschmerz
Welcome to the Bulldogs Aiden O’Driscoll
2 3
Replies
69
Views
7K
ossie_21
ossie_21
W W Biscuit
Bulldog Art
Replies
9
Views
517
grassman75
grassman75
stefoid
western bulldogs fringe festival
Replies
18
Views
1K
Freshwater
Freshwater

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top