jmoo wan
Formally, Mr Jmoo Wan
so MWPP and Headless both accused of being a head? we’ve got a job to do today to find out and lynch one of the heads. quite the head job we are facing
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Werewolf Nothing is all you get - vamps overpower all
- Thread starter Nothing
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
The Majestic
Embracing the chaos.
Yeah i struggle to get over. Beaten by a guy without q head is embarrassing lol
por_please_ya
por_kill_ye
- Mar 26, 2009
- 39,904
- 76,245
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Strikers, North Melbourne FC
Are we just assuming Headless has a role because of his flippant comment on Zombies? I feel like he was looking at the poll options and just said it.
I'm suss on a few other players around here more than him.
I'm suss on a few other players around here more than him.
- May 27, 2006
- 51,257
- 102,743
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- I'm aware of and love the Miami Dolphins
- Moderator
- #1,854
This registered user gets it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Majestic
Embracing the chaos.
I'm happy to hear other options to lynch if there's someone better than Headless.
MWPP
Flying High
Originally yes that was it for me
But known recruit Zerg pointing out how quiet I was without pointing out that headless was quieter in that same post about behavioural changes felt like shielding
Plus Zerg’s dismissal of the mechanic when evil (something he has done before) has made me even more convinced
Also I was interested to see if Tarks would hop on like he did yesterday
Tarkyn_24
Okeydoke7 is [redacted]
- Dec 23, 2006
- 57,977
- 84,341
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I’m happy with Headless but I was hoping to learn from the early votes.
MWPP
Flying High
The other thing is that there haven’t been many night deaths especially early on when behavioural cues are more of a clue so one large usual cue wasn’t there. Plus I didn’t want to speculate about who would kill Marc /THB lest it out our vig .
- May 27, 2006
- 51,257
- 102,743
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- I'm aware of and love the Miami Dolphins
- Moderator
- #1,859
This is all one big, very funny misunderstanding, MWPP.
- May 27, 2006
- 51,257
- 102,743
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- I'm aware of and love the Miami Dolphins
- Moderator
- #1,860
Thank you so much!
MWPP
Flying High
Anyway por_please_ya , who are those people you were referring to re: the ones you are more sus of than Headless?
myblueroan
The truth sometimes arrives on horses. 🐎
I'm interested in Eth. I wonder why JHF was so keen to pin him.
Maybe worth a punt?
Bluelegs
Content Enthusiast
Results so far. Please correct me if I got anything wrong.
Given Scythe either self-protected night one or possibly didn't even know how to submit an action I think it's reasonable to assume that the Wolves did not miss on him that night.
I'm going to assume for now that there is no SK in play after three nights of no kills (although it could be The_Reaper again). But more likely outcome is we have a different neutral role. Probably Arsonist.
We don't know what the recruiting factions actions are, but likely they are either, recruit every night or recruit every second night and kill on the other nights. If the latter then they missed a kill on night 2.
Mafia missed on night 2, it's possible they missed on Scythe but think it's more likely they hit a head or someone under his protection. There's a chance that Scythe put in his protect order on Night 2 before deadline after Tarks revealed that morning. But I think it's more likely he protected Tarks last night which left him open to be taken out himself. He may also not have known that you can't protect the same player two nights in a row. Tough for new players in a game like this.
Wolves have now missed two nights. Suspect they hit a head on night 1 and possibly tried to take out Tarks last night.
| Phase | N1 | D1 | N2 | D2 | N3 |
| Mafia | Kills MM(villager) | ??? | Kills Scythe (Doc) | ||
| Wolves | ??? | Kill THB (Saint) | ??? | ||
| Vamps/Zombies | Recruits ZM | ??? | ??? | ||
| Fake Seer (ZM) | Seers MCBG (Unsuccessful) | Claimed Seer of Gralin (villager) | dead | ||
| Seer (Tarks) | Seers ZM as Seer/Recruit | Seers someone as villager | Seers Scythe lol | ||
| Doctor (Scythe | ??? | ??? | Probably protects Tarks | ||
| Vig | Kills MM (villager) | Kills THB (Saint) | Kills BFew (Werecub) | ||
| Lynch Result | MCBG (Villager) | ZM (Fake Seer/Recruit) |
Given Scythe either self-protected night one or possibly didn't even know how to submit an action I think it's reasonable to assume that the Wolves did not miss on him that night.
I'm going to assume for now that there is no SK in play after three nights of no kills (although it could be The_Reaper again). But more likely outcome is we have a different neutral role. Probably Arsonist.
We don't know what the recruiting factions actions are, but likely they are either, recruit every night or recruit every second night and kill on the other nights. If the latter then they missed a kill on night 2.
Mafia missed on night 2, it's possible they missed on Scythe but think it's more likely they hit a head or someone under his protection. There's a chance that Scythe put in his protect order on Night 2 before deadline after Tarks revealed that morning. But I think it's more likely he protected Tarks last night which left him open to be taken out himself. He may also not have known that you can't protect the same player two nights in a row. Tough for new players in a game like this.
Wolves have now missed two nights. Suspect they hit a head on night 1 and possibly tried to take out Tarks last night.
MWPP
Flying High
I’m okay with eth and any other lurker for that matter but I meant it when I said I gave up trying to push them this game since I never seem to get any traction
And I thought they claimed a missed kill on Gralin but a fake seer on someone else who was set to be recruited
Coming from evil I take it all with a grain of salt
Gralin himself (as outer evil) faked a miss kill on me (villager) not long ago
Tarkyn_24
Okeydoke7 is [redacted]
- Dec 23, 2006
- 57,977
- 84,341
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Appears pretty likely to me. Happy to share my N2 result if we feel it’ll be advantageous. For now I think it’s not particularly useful.
Bluelegs
Content Enthusiast
Cheers. I agree that outed evil intel is unreliable.
Tarkyn_24
Okeydoke7 is [redacted]
- Dec 23, 2006
- 57,977
- 84,341
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
MWPP
Flying High
Re: an SK/poisoner/arsonist vs a non-killing neutral I am 50/50 vs one of those other roles v evil doc (or a role that has gone out of vogue like neutral redirector). I don’t think we’d have a jester or survivor as our only other neutral
Plus the HV/HZ would be neutral too
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Bluelegs
Content Enthusiast
MWPP
Flying High
Please share it before the morning deadline so the info doesn’t risk dying with you. I agree that it’s not needed for day phase as whoever you seered is not the probability play today with almost everyone else who has been uninvestigated possibly being any type of evil
Bluelegs
Content Enthusiast
I have seen games that had no SK or other neutral killing role before, usually offset by an evil doc.
An ED would also explain the amount of misses we're seeing too.
myblueroan
The truth sometimes arrives on horses. 🐎
myblueroan
The truth sometimes arrives on horses. 🐎
I reckon he was being truthful fwiw.
Pie 4 Life
Hall of Famer
Without a kill again for the “vamps” surely it is more likely to be zombies now?
Similar threads
