Should have used it in your case, maybe next timeSo were we.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should have used it in your case, maybe next timeSo were we.
Comeback or no comeback he should lose the Brownlow once he has lost his appeal and all legal avenues are exhausted.
He was leading the Brownlow in 2011 before he got injured and made the AA team in 2013 you dolt.So a midfielder averaging 11 kicks a week in a side that had 8, 10, 7 and 11 wins now can be construed as being a very good player?
Please.
Interesting that that jumped up to 16 kicks per week in 2012.
As did Contested possessions, clearances, rebound 50s and Time on Ground. All stats that relate to physicality.
Whereas disposal efficiency, clangers and uncontested possession remained much the same.
Just seems strange that this happened on the back of a PED program.
What is a coffee spoon?
He's the son of a club champion, started as an unfit battler who was dropped and written off by many young,
who became a three time B&F winner, a multiple all Australian and a Brownlow medallist.
He's a lifetime EFC person whose form and rise was a rare highlight in an unsuccessful period. He's pretty revered around the club for all these reasons. Is it that hard to understand?
Best and FairestWhy?
The appeal will very likely be lost, pazza. I'm not sure why you're so sure of anything different being the case and equally, a little bemused that you'd think people thinking the appeal won't succeed are in the minority.Here's a simple question.
Does anyone truly believe that the appeal will be lost? How can people be so sure that this will be the result.
Seems to be a lot of misguided hope that it does happen by many.
The appeal will very likely be lost, pazza. I'm not sure why you're so sure of anything different being the case.
Just stop. He won two of his three BnFs before 2012.Prior to PEDs:
After PEDs:
Well yes, it is difficult to understand. That's why I posed the question.
He's had one very, very good season. He was unstoppable. He had another good season in 2013. Aside from that, he's been Ok at best as a player.
He was a battler, who became a beast after using PEDs.
As a leader, his team was mediocre until he led them into a PED program that cost the club millions and made them the laughing stock of Australian sport, and cost most of his players their careers.
Yet he's revered??
I genuinely don't get it. What, cause he's a nice bloke??
Now I'm not saying I hate him and he's a s**t man - but he's simply been an average/Ok player over his whole career and clearly been a terrible leader. I don't for the life of me see how Essendon fans would 'revere' him, and even moreso why the rest of us are expected to .
I mean, if you take out 2012 his stats are in the David Armitage territory.
I'm hoping it gets upheld!Here's a simple question.
Does anyone truly believe that the appeal will be lost? How can people be so sure that this will be the result.
Seems to be a lot of misguided hope that it does happen by many.
Here's a simple question.
Does anyone truly believe that the appeal will be lost? How can people be so sure that this will be the result.
Seems to be a lot of misguided hope that it does happen by many.
you just nerver can tell what an appeal court will do I guess. Is there enough evidence to overturn the decision? We truly don't know the answer.
I'm hoping it gets upheld!
Imagine the drama!!
It's the best possible result. They were still found guilty of taking PEDs which is not being disputed, and they served a 1 year ban - but then they get off on a technicality!
You couldn't make that s**t up.
Rory Sloane - career average kicks 11.1 (11.9 in 2016)So a midfielder averaging 11 kicks a week in a side that had 8, 10, 7 and 11 wins now can be construed as being a very good player?
Please.
Interesting that that jumped up to 16 kicks per week in 2012.
As did Contested possessions, clearances, rebound 50s and Time on Ground. All stats that relate to physicality.
Whereas disposal efficiency, clangers and uncontested possession remained much the same.
Just seems strange that this happened on the back of a PED program.
Just stop. He won two of his three BnFs before 2012.
You have no idea what you're talking about and should stop digging now.
More income for chiefI'm hoping it gets upheld!
Imagine the drama!!
It's the best possible result. They were still found guilty of taking PEDs which is not being disputed, and they served a 1 year ban - but then they get off on a technicality!
You couldn't make that s**t up.
In a team that won 10 and 7 games for the season.
That doesn't make you great. Doesn't even make you very good. David Teague won a B&F when his team won 10 games FFS!
Keep digging.In a team that won 10 and 7 games for the season.
That doesn't make you great. Doesn't even make you very good. David Teague won a B&F when his team won 10 games FFS!
You don't even know what you're arguing about anymore, do you?
'Jobe was only good because he was on PEDs'.
Ok, well here's some demonstrable evidence that suggests he was a very good player before the supplement program.
'Yeah but the team was s**t at the time!'.
Yeah but he won his Brownlow in a year when when Essendon finished 11th. You know, when he was artificially good.....
Derp.
They fell apart at the end of that season didn't they?
They were like 8/1
They fell apart at the end of that season didn't they?
They were like 8/1