True North
Norm Smith Medallist
We need to legalise automatic weapons and let both sides duke it out. Leaving 100 Million on the planet so it can be nice again and the dinosours come back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Millions of years of climate. We take records for around 150 of those years and we come to the conclusion that are the ones causing it. Ok.
Makes no difference. Millions vs 150, think about it.This isnt inner city latte sippers saying this. Its actual firefighters on the ground.
That’s great buddy.
Makes no difference. Millions vs 150, think about it.
You do understand the ultimate end game then is population reduction. There is no other way around the apparent problem unless humans are culled. This is what does my head in when people use the term ‘carbon footprint’, that’s us. The best way to reduce ones carbon footprint is to not have children then kill themselves. As for the so called science, most people regard Big Bang and evolution as truth. They are only theories, that’s what are, theories.Humans have only been recording temperature for 150 years or so.
Before that, you are relying on scientists to plot temperature data from tree rings and ice cores. Those same scientists, all seem to agree on whats happening with mans influence on the environment, and what we should be trying to do about it.
The scientists that don't agree with them, tend to be employed by mining companies, religious, or both.
You do understand the ultimate end game then is population reduction. There is no other way around the apparent problem unless humans are culled. This is what does my head in when people use the term ‘carbon footprint’, that’s us. The best way to reduce ones carbon footprint is to not have children then kill themselves. As for the so called science, most people regard Big Bang and evolution as truth. They are only theories, that’s what are, theories.
Your a idiotYou do understand the ultimate end game then is population reduction. There is no other way around the apparent problem unless humans are culled. This is what does my head in when people use the term ‘carbon footprint’, that’s us. The best way to reduce ones carbon footprint is to not have children then kill themselves. As for the so called science, most people regard Big Bang and evolution as truth. They are only theories, that’s what are, theories.
Still waiting for someone to deny the theory of gravity by flying around the room.Your a idiot
A scientific theory bears no correlation to the common use of the word “theory”
A “scientific theory“ is the most decorated explanation of the natural order, backed up by repeatable experimentation and verified by continuous ongoing observation.
Your a idiot
I don't see anyone volunteering to remove themselves from the gene pool to help fix this supposed problem.
If people who seek to encourage discussion of climate change want to avoid the growing groundswell of other people screaming bullshit back at them, then they really need to stop shouting about every EVENT and pretending it is a PATTERN.
It’s common practice, mostly by those that conform to the belief of creation by way of an unalterable, unfalsifiable unseen first cause or prime mover.Still waiting for someone to deny the theory of gravity by flying around the room.
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?Actually even gravity is still a theory.
Fundamentalist Christians and global warming deniers use term 'theory' as evidence that they are no more relevant than say, the theory that God created the world in 6 days 7 odd thousand years ago, or that Alan Jones understands more about global warming than all of the worlds climate scientists combined.
Our mouths gape in amazement at how ******* dumb these stupid campaigners are. But there's no reasoning with a fundamentalist Christian or a global warming denier.
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?
How do you actually conclude that by the question I asked? See how your bias causes you to jump to false accusations?What about all the people that have a downward trajectory? Or children with cancer? The whole church kiddy fiddler thing...
By your reasoning, that's God's work as well.
Pretty sure I did that last Saturday nightStill waiting for someone to deny the theory of gravity by flying around the room.
please don’tI could compile a pretty healthy list of BF posters who swim in the shallow end of said pool. We can start there.
I would think it was really wonderful and I would be ecstatic for him and not knock his faith at all.Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?
How do you actually conclude that by the question I asked? See how your bias causes you to jump to false accusations?
Still making false accusations.It's along the same lines as when you cherry pick the 'good miracles' to suit your own religious bias.
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you actually make a cogent argument for starters?Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?