NSW Bushfires

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

It’s ok, Israel Folau to the repentance rescue again, the bushfires were caused by gay marriage and women’s bodily autonomy rights, god started the fires in order to protect us from people getting married and self autonomy.
Makes complete sense right?
He even shed a tear whilst saving us, bless his little tattooed righteousness!
Funny thing is though, what did our native fauna do to when they voted on SSM?
 
Makes no difference. Millions vs 150, think about it.

Humans have only been recording temperature for 150 years or so.

Before that, you are relying on scientists to plot temperature data from tree rings and ice cores. Those same scientists, all seem to agree on whats happening with mans influence on the environment, and what we should be trying to do about it.

The scientists that don't agree with them, tend to be employed by mining companies, religious, or both.
 
Humans have only been recording temperature for 150 years or so.

Before that, you are relying on scientists to plot temperature data from tree rings and ice cores. Those same scientists, all seem to agree on whats happening with mans influence on the environment, and what we should be trying to do about it.

The scientists that don't agree with them, tend to be employed by mining companies, religious, or both.
You do understand the ultimate end game then is population reduction. There is no other way around the apparent problem unless humans are culled. This is what does my head in when people use the term ‘carbon footprint’, that’s us. The best way to reduce ones carbon footprint is to not have children then kill themselves. As for the so called science, most people regard Big Bang and evolution as truth. They are only theories, that’s what are, theories.
 
Last edited:
You do understand the ultimate end game then is population reduction. There is no other way around the apparent problem unless humans are culled. This is what does my head in when people use the term ‘carbon footprint’, that’s us. The best way to reduce ones carbon footprint is to not have children then kill themselves. As for the so called science, most people regard Big Bang and evolution as truth. They are only theories, that’s what are, theories.

Evolution isn't a theory. It was a theory way back until around 1920, but has since been accepted by everyone except the happy clappy sky people.
 
Actually even gravity is still a theory.
Fundamentalist Christians and global warming deniers use term 'theory' as evidence that they are no more relevant than say, the theory that God created the world in 6 days 7 odd thousand years ago, or that Alan Jones understands more about global warming than all of the worlds climate scientists combined.

Our mouths gape in amazement at how ******* dumb these stupid campaigners are. But there's no reasoning with a fundamentalist Christian or a global warming denier.
 
You do understand the ultimate end game then is population reduction. There is no other way around the apparent problem unless humans are culled. This is what does my head in when people use the term ‘carbon footprint’, that’s us. The best way to reduce ones carbon footprint is to not have children then kill themselves. As for the so called science, most people regard Big Bang and evolution as truth. They are only theories, that’s what are, theories.
Your a idiot
A scientific theory bears no correlation to the common use of the word “theory”
A “scientific theory“ is the most decorated explanation of the natural order, backed up by repeatable experimentation and verified by continuous ongoing observation.
Your a idiot
 
Your a idiot
A scientific theory bears no correlation to the common use of the word “theory”
A “scientific theory“ is the most decorated explanation of the natural order, backed up by repeatable experimentation and verified by continuous ongoing observation.
Your a idiot
Still waiting for someone to deny the theory of gravity by flying around the room.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If people who seek to encourage discussion of climate change want to avoid the growing groundswell of other people screaming bullshit back at them, then they really need to stop shouting about every EVENT and pretending it is a PATTERN.


Of they could put forward the evidence based findings of thousands of scientists and then have people scream bullshit back.

Would that work for you?
 
Still waiting for someone to deny the theory of gravity by flying around the room.
It’s common practice, mostly by those that conform to the belief of creation by way of an unalterable, unfalsifiable unseen first cause or prime mover.
I won’t debunk the Kalam cosmological argument here, as it’s been eviscerated by peops more eloquent than I.
But I will add, that any premise or claim must first meet the requirement of being falsifiable in order to make its way to the hypothesis stage.
Scientific illiteracy is such a bore.
 
Just look at the lovely spring smoke in sydney that happens every year around this time. Sometimes twice. Isn't our natural climate wonderful.
1574117204263.jpg
 
Actually even gravity is still a theory.
Fundamentalist Christians and global warming deniers use term 'theory' as evidence that they are no more relevant than say, the theory that God created the world in 6 days 7 odd thousand years ago, or that Alan Jones understands more about global warming than all of the worlds climate scientists combined.

Our mouths gape in amazement at how ******* dumb these stupid campaigners are. But there's no reasoning with a fundamentalist Christian or a global warming denier.
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?
 
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?

What about all the people that have a downward trajectory? Or children with cancer? The whole church kiddy fiddler thing...

By your reasoning, that's God's work as well.
 
What about all the people that have a downward trajectory? Or children with cancer? The whole church kiddy fiddler thing...

By your reasoning, that's God's work as well.
How do you actually conclude that by the question I asked? See how your bias causes you to jump to false accusations?
 
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?
I would think it was really wonderful and I would be ecstatic for him and not knock his faith at all.

The God of the Judeo-Christian tradition is, of course, a humanist
 
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you actually make a cogent argument for starters?
The Theory of Gravity, The Theory of Evolution by way of Natural Selection, Germ Theory, The Big Bang Theory etc. are all as close to absolute fact as the scientific method can get,meh, there are some minor details we are working on, but they are working models that have not only saved lives, but have prolonged our life expectancy by double and our knowledge of our universe by thousand fold compared to some random druggo falling to his knees and screAming JEEBUS......
You have all your work ahead of you and if you continue down this path, next time, I am not going to be so kind!
 
Let’s say for arguments sake, that you knew someone who was a massive loser who couldn’t hold down a job, constantly high, and suffered from depression and incredibly low self esteem. Then all of sudden turned up one day claiming to be a born-again Christian was no longer an addict, didn’t have depression anymore and just generally felt good about themselves, and let’s say that the person didn’t receive any counselling, weren’t involved in any group or particular person at the time, weren’t hypnotised, etc, and that this person was genuine, they weren’t faking it, it was actually like something like God intervened in their life. Would you be so anti-God after experiencing that? Would it make you question the possibility that your theory wasn’t correct?

Finding meaning in ones life can completely turn a person around. Doesn’t prove God exists, just means they found a purpose in something.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top