Seen as though you guys have the number 1 and 2 picks same as St Kilda in 2000, i was just interested in this scenario.
You guys get to pick the best 2 youngsters in the country right, so it doesn't matter which order you pick them in.
But do you pick the best player first because you believe he has earned the right to call himself the number 1 draft pick.
or do you pick the best player second because you don't want him to have the pressure that goes with being a number 1 draft pick (even though there is still pressure to perform as a number 2 pick but people seem to remember who the number 1 pick is much more than the number 2 pick)
or do you think that it doesn't matter either way.
You guys get to pick the best 2 youngsters in the country right, so it doesn't matter which order you pick them in.
But do you pick the best player first because you believe he has earned the right to call himself the number 1 draft pick.
or do you pick the best player second because you don't want him to have the pressure that goes with being a number 1 draft pick (even though there is still pressure to perform as a number 2 pick but people seem to remember who the number 1 pick is much more than the number 2 pick)
or do you think that it doesn't matter either way.