Number Patterns

[Supermercado]

#11 - Stynes to Simmonds to Jolly to Johnson (all ruckmen)
#27 - Wight to Ingerson to Rivers (all defenders)
#30 - Seow to Bryce to Hopgood to David Cockatoo-Collins to Chisholm to Godfrey (all ****)

 

[DynamoUltra]

I remember there was one regarding Melbourne and the finals in every Olympic year. Not quite sure on how it went, but I remember a teacher posted it around school in 2000...

 

[JuveRule]

I remember there was one regarding Melbourne and the finals in every Olympic year. Not quite sure on how it went, but I remember a teacher posted it around school in 2000...

This is just off the top of my head:
1900: Premiers
1948: Premiers
1956: Premiers
1960: Premiers
1964: Premiers
1988: Runners up
2000: Runners up

 

[Slander]

#11 - Stynes to Simmonds to Jolly to Johnson (all ruckmen)
#27 - Wight to Ingerson to Rivers (all defenders)
#30 - Seow to Bryce to Hopgood to David Cockatoo-Collins to Chisholm to Godfrey (all ****)

#2 Flower to Tingay to Armstrong to Jones (all midfielders)
#4 Grgic to Ellis to Holland (all maligned)

 

[Spirit of 26]

I read somewhere that Allan Jackovich's number was the same as his IQ.

 

[rick James]

I read somewhere that Allan Jackovich's number was the same as his IQ.

how did they fit a million numbers on his jumper? Well, at first at least, by the end of his career that would have been quite easy really.

 

[Slander]

#11 - Stynes to Simmonds to Jolly to Johnson (all ruckmen)
#27 - Wight to Ingerson to Rivers (all defenders)
#30 - Seow to Bryce to Hopgood to David Cockatoo-Collins to Chisholm to Godfrey (all ****)

Wasn't Chisholm #19?

 

[bringbackschwarter5]

#5 Schwarter to Mclean (both champions of the game)

Still feel sorry for schwarter

 

[Supermercado]

Wasn't Chisholm #19?

Right you are. I've ****ing lost it.

 

[ExTasDeeMan]

Right you are. I've ****ing lost it.

That's it, I'm calling the Australian.

 

[Slander]

Right you are. I've ****ing lost it.

Just while I'm on a roll, wasn't Hopgood #15? Or was he #30 before then?

#7 Kowal to Powell to Moorcroft to Miller (dissapointing)

That's it, I'm calling the Australian.

On me or Mercs?

He got quoted in that article I got the phrase: 'Most of which was unprintable...'

 

[melbournemartin]

#1 Shannahan to Heffernan (both were decent at their old clubs, did little for us)

 

[Canna7]

Stephen Powell was good when he was fit, 2000 and 2002 he played well for us. And Miller will come good eventually...I hope.

 

[Supermercado]

#1 Shannahan to Heffernan (both were decent at their old clubs, did little for us)

Balls to that - Shanahan was key in our '98 revival. He was never going to be a long term proposition was did excellently that year given the state of our backline before.

 

[purple sneakers]

Balls to that - Shanahan was key in our '98 revival. He was never going to be a long term proposition was did excellently that year given the state of our backline before.

I agree but think you may have been a little bit harsh on Hopgood Supermercado, no superstar but did a few useful things.

 

[Slander]

Stephen Powell was good when he was fit, 2000 and 2002 he played well for us. And Miller will come good eventually...I hope.

The way he left the club was dissapointing, most certainly not his time while at the club. His absence was a big part of the 2003 slide!