TBH I'm not sure. I would assume so but haven't read it for a while.
There must be some mechanism. IMO, something as drastic as this, even if it fails, is needed. At a min, will force change within the current board.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
TBH I'm not sure. I would assume so but haven't read it for a while.
Does our constitution not have some sort of provision to force a spill and vote?
The next board
Ponting
Arocca
McKernan
King
We need more business oriented input.
De Rauch?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
FWIW I tend to hold the board accountable for our off field and the Coaches for on field. Our off field performances I am comfortable with considering our circumstances only a few years ago. Im not sure we need an Eddie type or high profile ex player to raise our off field profile. If you asked me to name the boards of any of the successful teams I would struggle because they are behind the scenes...and thats how I think it should be.
If the coach is not performing then the board intervenes as part of its due process. Assuming Brad has KPIs we should also assume that if he is not hitting them that he is held accountable like most employees. If the board is not capable of holding him accountable then it is failing in its role....and that would be my greatest concern as I doubt Scotts would fall on his own sword.
I would love to see that happen.
Would Arocca come back though?
and would King/Ponting be on the board with their media commitments?
Oh dear Jesus not De Rauch.
Cam Joyce has Scotts ‘lap dog’ written all over him.In regards to list management, recruitment & trading:
One thing I do know is that on a number of occasions during drafts and list management decisions over the last 2 years Brad Scott and Cam Joyce have gone against the recommendations of Mark Finnigan (recruitment manager) & Michael McMahon (List manager).
The trading Pruess decision was one particular example. McMahon wanted him on the list and wanted to hold him to his contract unless we got a pick inside the top 30 for him. Joyce signed off on the Pruess/Tyson swap despite McMahon not wanting it at all. We subsequently signed Tyson to a 3 year deal which (McMahon) was left fuming about.
The 2016 draft was a complete schmozzle. That was during the transition period where Joyce was moving into the GM of football role, but still wanted control over recruitment decisions. We picked Simpkin, Watson & Williams with our first 3 picks. All the recruiters wanted Sam Powell Pepper at our first but Joyce wanted Simpkin. Guess what happened?
The next two picks are even funnier. At pick 34 we identified Tom Stewart & Luke Ryan as priorities, because we needed better kicking out of the back half. At 36 we identified the need for a small forward I’m lead to believe that we were really keen on one of Willie Rioli/Kayle Kirby/Tingpunwuti.
We then ended up with Dec Watson And Josh Williams instead. Is it a coincidence that our part time QLD recruiter was tight with Joyce? I think not.
There are various other examples of these sorts of things happening too.
If he wasn’t such a highly sought after coach and had time, a group led by Ricky Ponting and perhaps Mckernan would be a dangerous prospect. We are completely and utterly faceless right now and there is no more revered figure in Australian sport than punter.
We need high profile names to garner traction and you look no further than your number one ticket holder and a former champion of the club.
Yeah, when being anti gambling is our key, and successful, USP, having the face of Crown literally called Punter isn't going to happen.
Not fluffy enough?
I’m amused by the suggestions that we should break up this terrible boys club by getting Mckernan/Carey/name old player we loved back to Arden St. Sure, let’s be old Carlton, running the ultimate boys club and putting faith in guys with no discernible coaching or management capability because they played great footy for us back when we were good.
Brad was a good get from a successful background on and off field. Turns out he has Malthouse’s autocratic, inflexible approach in a more publicly palatable package, and the network and appointments in the club to not be challenged as he should be, given the performance of the team and list.
Time for change, yes, but not by looking backwards.
Mobilise and support board challenges.
Nothing of any relevance will change until the head is cut off.
I agree to a degree.Time for change, yes, but not by looking backwards.
What was the thing you were talking about prior to the Adelaide game?
Is there something that we can actually mobilise behind.
Words on the net are great but ultimately nothing.
LOL, the anti-gambling bullshit can simply be removed with the stroke of the (new) boards pen. GONE.
We're a football club, not the Salvation ****ing Army.
I think if there are changes at board level, IF, you can't replace them with all of the same type.
Sure, put one 90s hard arse on there, but you still need forward thinking types.
I don't want to see the half forward line from the 96 grand final, I want to see a balanced group of people.
Let's not retreat into the myth of the old.
As rudderless as football dept looks, and there is some discontent amongst members, this club has a stable future now. Which we didn't have in 2007. Something has gone right, and the last 12 years are not due entirely to WANM.
Get a coach and a football dept (obviously, far from easy), get some excitement back in the ******* joint and amongst members, and all this goes away.