Official Cameron White Thread

[Footylover1]

You moron. Where the hell have I been biased toward Dan Cullen? I said he should not be in the side, you dingbat.



Since you can't even organise your arguments properly and use 'lol' all the time, I'm guessing there's nothing in your head for water to affect anyway.

Right! You are the ones that can't organise your arguments properly because you still can't handle the fact that Cameron White is in the Aussie side and doing well. Just face facts, he is the next big thing!

 

[mbuck]

Got any evidence of that?

Thought not.

EVERY victorian player thread that comes up, you are there posting at how bad the player is...

 

[Bentleigh]

Also -

I talk up; Hilfenhaus, Tait, Clarke, Watson. etc.

Infact I bag very, very few Australian players.

(Katich aside).

Are they all Victorian?

 

[Footylover1]

Also -

I talk up; Hilfenhaus, Tait, Clarke, Watson. etc.

Infact I bag very, very few Australian players.

(Katich aside).

Are they all Victorian?

I think Hilfenhaus might be Victorian. NO! Wait! He's Tasmanian. Just for a sec I thought Tasmania was still connected to Victoria lol

 

[just maybe]

I rate White because he is a superstar.

Now this is just gormless. 2 innings, and suddenly he's a superstar.

Being picked for Australia and performing, seems the selectors, White himself and the rest of the cricket-world agree.

One of the very best and best potential prospect in the game world wide.

You'd agree, if you didn't hate Victorians.

Yep, no objectivity. Just outrageous nonsense claims.

 

[Bentleigh]

I say where Clarke, Symonds and Hussey want to bat should take precedence over where the inferior batsman Watson is more suited if he comes back in.

Amen to that.

Not only where they want to bat, but more importantly where it suits the team better.

ie. Clarke/Hussey/Symo batting 4/5/6 suits the side much better.

You want your best batsman to face as many balls as they can. Not be wasted batting at 7 and 8.

IMO, Watson should only come in as
1) An opener, if the Hayden move fails.
2) At no 8, ahead of one of the quicks and Hogg. Lee, Bracken and McGrath are ahead of him, MJ will be, but now? hard to say - he looks good, but Watson's a better ODI bowler than Clark.
3) At no 7 if someone else gets injured or they choose to prefer him to White because of his excellent ODI bowling record over the past year. Yes he's less suited there, but why stuff our middle order superstars around just cos of him?

Well said mate

 

[just maybe]

Right! You are the ones that can't organise your arguments properly because you still can't handle the fact that Cameron White is in the Aussie side and doing well. Just face facts, he is the next big thing!

Oh, that's cute. You don't really understand what you've said so you come back with an irrelevant blob of text.

 

[Bentleigh]

Now this is just gormless. 2 innings, and suddenly he's a superstar.

Yep, no objectivity. Just outrageous nonsense claims.

Why was Michael Clarke picked in the Australian side?

He didn't have the stats.

It was clear to the cricket world he was an outstanding talent.

Ditto White.

 

[brad352]

If you don't know I might be anti-NSW when it comes to the Cricket but I do recognise a good player like Nathan Bracken. So why don't you do the same and recognise a good player like Cameron White, just maybe you need to stop drinking to much of the Adelaide water it's going to your head lol

Bracken's ODI performances put him in the top tier of bowlers in the world, White's scored 45 runs in his ODI career. Talent does not equal being universally worshipped before you've done anything to justify it

 

[just maybe]

EVERY victorian player thread that comes up, you are there posting at how bad the player is...

Evidence please.

The only Victorian players I criticise are White (for being picked too early) and Hodge.

Now either find further evidence or retract your stupid accusation.

 

[Bentleigh]

watson is a better batter than bowler so put him in the top order, he would make the side on his batting alone

I disagree.

 

[just maybe]

Why was Michael Clarke picked in the Australian side?

He didn't have the stats.

It was clear to the cricket world he was an outstanding talent.

Ditto White.

Do you think posting the icon makes you right?

Clarke's promotion was widely ridiculed, and his miserable post-debut performances justified this ridicule.

He wasn't ready, just like White isn't.

 

[Lidge]

Evidence please.

The only Victorian players I criticise are White (for being picked too early) and Hodge.

Now either find further evidence or retract your stupid accusation.

So you're a huge fan of Mick Lewis 'eh?

 

[Footylover1]

Bracken's ODI performances put him in the top tier of bowlers in the world, White's scored 45 runs in his ODI career. Good comparison

I wasn't comparing the two, i was just pointing out the fact that I can recognise a great player unlike certain people from SA who are upset because there's no SA Players in the national team.

 

[just maybe]

So you're a huge fan of Mick lewis 'eh?

Haha well, I leave the bagging of Mick Lewis to others, as unfortunately I missed the 0/113 performance.

 

[just maybe]

I wasn't comparing the two, i was just pointing out the fact that I can recognise a great player unlike certain people from SA who are upset because there's no SA Players in the national team.

Hey trollop, you capable of responding to anything I've said yet, or are you going to keep making accusations you can't back up?

 

[Footylover1]

Haha well, I leave the bagging of Mick Lewis to others, as unfortunately I missed the 0/113 performance.

Why should Brad Hodge be out of the team? He was dropped after making 200 not out? Do you really think he deserved to be dropped? Or are you still upset that no South Aussie's are in the test team?

 

[brad352]

I wasn't comparing the two, i was just pointing out the fact that I can recognise a great player unlike certain people from SA who are upset because there's no SA Players in the national team.

Of course you were, the basis of your post was that since you apparently consider Bracken a good player JM should rate White the same way, despite him not having done anything.

 

[Footylover1]

Hey trollop, you capable of responding to anything I've said yet, or are you going to keep making accusations you can't back up?

You're a very bad troll you know that. It's so easy to own you.

 

[Footylover1]

Of course you were, the basis of your post was that since you apparently consider Bracken a good player JM should rate White the same way, despite him not having done anything.

I meant he should recognise good players I wasn't comparing the two. You should read it carefully.

 

[Bentleigh]

Why should Brad Hodge be out of the team? He was dropped after making 200 not out? Do you really think he deserved to be dropped? Or are you still upset that no South Aussie's are in the test team?

Gilespie was also dropped after making 200*

 

[Footylover1]

Gilespie was also dropped after making 200*

Yeah but he wasn't in good form with the ball unlike Hodge with the bat. But then again Gillespie is from SA maybe that's why Just Maybe is still upset about?

 

[just maybe]

Why should Brad Hodge be out of the team? He was dropped after making 200 not out? Do you really think he deserved to be dropped?

I don't really care to be honest.

Or are you still upset that no South Aussie's are in the test team?

Care to back this one up?

Oh that's right, you won't. Because you're full of crap, you think you 'own' me, yet whenever I challenge one of your lies you cover your ears and gurgle.

 

[DIG]

Amen to that.

Not only where they want to bat, but more importantly where it suits the team better.

ie. Clarke/Hussey/Symo batting 4/5/6 suits the side much better.

You want your best batsman to face as many balls as they can. Not be wasted batting at 7 and 8.



Well said mate

Cheers.

FWIW i'm loving White at #7, really hope it comes off. But i rate Watson highly in the one-day arena too, if he can recover ok he'll give us some good depth come the World Cup.

 

[just maybe]

Yeah but he wasn't in good form with the ball unlike Hodge with the bat. But then again Gillespie is from SA maybe that's why Just Maybe is still upset about?

Wasn't in good form with the ball? He won MOTS, topped the wickets list and headed the averages. Not in form with the ball? Bahahahahahahaha.

Get your facts straight, 'owning' you is obviously too eay.

But regardless, I didn't think Dizzy should be picked for the first Ashes Test anyway.