Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wasn't his call. He was contracted for two more years.It was his call. The salary relief for us sealed it.
I just don't believe that Caddy went for that reason. There has to be be more to it.
It was his call. The salary relief for us sealed it.
There's no question about that. But as Cook explained when a player says they want to be somewhere else the philosophy is to let them go. That was what happened with Caddy. The salary cap relief was clearly a factor in that decision though because we are still paying 100% of the cap.I think, and I could be thinking out of turn, that YOTC was meaning that he went from required player (and reported that Geelong wouldn't include him in a Deledio deal) to being shipped out in the space of days.
I think, and I could be thinking out of turn, that YOTC was meaning that he went from required player (and reported that Geelong wouldn't include him in a Deledio deal) to being shipped out in the space of days.
I don't really follow YOTC. Caddy said he had no intention of moving then Richmond approached him, he saw the opportunity to play with his mate Prestia so decided to give it ago. That's the public version. And it's pretty easy to infer they promised him more midfield time. Then Cook has explained the Geelong side of it. What's the source of incredulity?Yep, exactly my point. I find it incredulous that Caddy requested a trade when there was only, publicly in any case, support for him to stay from the club. He was apparently happy at Geelong so what happened to make that change?
Yep, exactly my point. I find it incredulous that Caddy requested a trade when there was only, publicly in any case, support for him to stay from the club. He was apparently happy at Geelong so what happened to make that change?
I don't really follow YOTC. Caddy said he had no intention of moving then Richmond approached him, he saw the opportunity to play with his mate Prestia so decided to give it ago. That's the public version. And it's pretty easy to infer they promised him more midfield time. Then Cook has explained the Geelong side of it. What's the source of incredulity?
Maybe I'm not cynical enough but this set of facts I can completely understand:Maybe it's the cynic in me but that public version just doesn't wash with me. Caddy had already moved clubs once, was at a team where he was in the best 22 and one that was playing finals year after year. By all reports he was paid pretty well at Geelong too (hey, we got salary cap relief from him leaving remember). He then decides because a mate is going to play there (who he was happy to leave in GC when he left for Geelong) that he wants to go to a perennially losing club with a poor culture. Don't you find that just a bit fishy?
Maybe it's the cynic in me but that public version just doesn't wash with me. Caddy had already moved clubs once, was at a team where he was in the best 22 and one that was playing finals year after year. By all reports he was paid pretty well at Geelong too (hey, we got salary cap relief from him leaving remember). He then decides because a mate is going to play there (who he was happy to leave in GC when he left for Geelong) that he wants to go to a perennially losing club with a poor culture. Don't you find that just a bit fishy?
Maybe I'm not cynical enough but this set of facts I can completely understand:
1. Approached by another club who shows strong interest
2. Probably offered better coin/contract length
3. Offered more midfield time
4. Chance to play with a good mate
5. Probably a fair amount of bitterness at treatment by Geelong (i.e. not enough midfield time)
Plus, I would want to have a competing theory for the one staring me in the face before I got suspicious. What else could the explanation be?
Maybe I'm not cynical enough but this set of facts I can completely understand:
1. Approached by another club who shows strong interest
2. Probably offered better coin/contract length
3. Offered more midfield time
4. Chance to play with a good mate
5. Probably a fair amount of bitterness at treatment by Geelong (i.e. not enough midfield time)
Plus, I would want to have a competing theory for the one staring me in the face before I got suspicious. What else could the explanation be?
Sounds like someone making sure they don't s**t where they eat, lest the trade doesn't come off.His manager in this article put it all on Geelong (as a good manager should do so who knows the truth):
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...onsider-move-to-richmond-20161012-gs0x25.html
Perhaps if Geelong never made the failed bid for Deledio he would still be at Geelong.
Here are the quotes from Caddy himself that explain it all IMO:His manager in this article put it all on Geelong (as a good manager should do so who knows the truth):
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...onsider-move-to-richmond-20161012-gs0x25.html
Perhaps if Geelong never made the failed bid for Deledio he would still be at Geelong.
Maybe I'm not cynical enough but this set of facts I can completely understand:
Agree with these points CE and IMO it played out pretty much as listed:
1. Approached by another club who shows strong interest
The ego thing sits well with some players. IMO, being pursued would stroke his ego well enough.
2. Probably offered better coin/contract length
Money talks - and he seems the $$ type.
3. Offered more midfield time
This is big IMO. He wanted more and knew it would be limited with Sel, PFD, Scooter and Menegola in the frame.
4. Chance to play with a good mate
5. Probably a fair amount of bitterness at treatment by Geelong (i.e. not enough midfield time)
I think he was happy with is GFC situation in solitary observations - however when the above factors got rolling and newer, shinier option presented itself, he became more willing to move on.
Plus, I would want to have a competing theory for the one staring me in the face before I got suspicious. What else could the explanation be?
Couldn't stand over the last few years. Watching switched on players move the ball fast down the field like clockwork only to have some spud ruin it. Slowing down the play and taking 5 seconds to dispose of it, and by that time their backline is flooded.
Saw Caddy do exactly that tonight and for that reason alone am glad he's gone. It's a real pet hate of mine. Pretty sure Blicavs does it a lot but if I have him confused with others then my apologies to him.
Hey Chris Scott.Blicavs is the king
It wasn't his call. He was contracted for two more years.
Maybe it's the cynic in me but that public version just doesn't wash with me. Caddy had already moved clubs once, was at a team where he was in the best 22 and one that was playing finals year after year. By all reports he was paid pretty well at Geelong too (hey, we got salary cap relief from him leaving remember). He then decides because a mate is going to play there (who he was happy to leave in GC when he left for Geelong) that he wants to go to a perennially losing club with a poor culture. Don't you find that just a bit fishy?
So? If the player agrees he can be traded. He was approached by Richmond, he wanted to play with Prestia. His call.
Excuse for what? It's just one of many reasons he had. The others being contract length, coin and the promise of more midfield time (and being pissed off at Geelong for not giving him that).