CheapCharlie
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 12, 2015
- 6,416
- 7,985
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Maybe Sydney has finally learnt the many lesson that Rohan and Finals don't mix well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Put the tinnie down mate.Its a fact if you don't like it don't read it. What are you the moral police and what is offensive about it. Were you one who actually thought it would happen ? If you were Good the cap fits.
You’re right. I’ve been lied to on here! 50-50 game again.Why is everyone saying no Davis?
He's been named.
Mate it was not personal to anyone in particular but if I want to state something I will. If people can't handle it stiff. I don't get personal playing the man unless I'm returning fire.C'mon Wolfy, most of us don't have to bag each other out. Play the argument, not the person.
You know, it’s the damndest thing, but I suddenly realise that’s a question I’ve just never given any thought to until now.
No I saw the post by someone else before and assumed it was correct. He’s playing.Davis is out?
Mate it was not personal to anyone in particular but if I want to state something I will. If people can't handle it stiff. I don't get personal playing the man unless I'm returning fire.
Ok you could do with some think music.Just settle down & let us learn about this Aussie Rules in our own time.
Haha yeah for some reason I thought he missed.He played against Melbourne in RD23 so I have no idea where that came from haha
So you are saying we have to replace like for like. I used them as an example. He is a bum. And if you think in AFL Football when a player is omitted he can only be replaced by a player who can play the role of the player he is replacing then you should think again. It is called flexibility and good teams work around it.
Why is everyone saying no Davis?
He's been named.
Haha yeah for some reason I thought he missed.
Guess I don't deserve to be commenting on footy after all
No probs. I too am very disappointed Dawson has been omitted.
I could.Ok you could do with some think music.
Agreed But the other 2 will not be pushed off the ball in one on ones, will keep their head over the ball and will fight to the death to win a contest that could be the difference. Even though they both look old age pensioners on walking frames the way they move.Newman actually gets the ball and is less likely to F it up than the two Butcher boys - Jack and Hanners.
ShhhSomeone going round his place with a crowbar maybe
Ok you could do with some think music.
I was using him as an example and was really harsh on him early doors but he has improved to be what you would call an adequate contributor and Im stuffed if i know what he has done wrong not to have been in included at some stage with the injuries and ins and outs we have had over the season.For a final, absolutely. We need players who know how to play off half back. I actually have no doubt Dawson could play down back with his attributes (albeit he would be wasted) but not for the first time in a final.
We play a back 7, we always have. If we take one out we need to replace.
Towers I don’t think is much better if at all than Newman (and had been tried at half back early and was terrible). They are both playing on the fringes. I don’t get the Towers love personally.
Lloyd maybe? Smith would have been the natural fit so he'll be missed. Everyone else will be playing on their talls.Who takes Greene?
Newman? Really dunno, maybe Aliir?Who takes Greene?