I wasn't suggesting playing him as a forward. Pendlebury or Sidebottom could play in attack. Sier is good for one position.What did Sier do playing as a forward against Coburg?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn't suggesting playing him as a forward. Pendlebury or Sidebottom could play in attack. Sier is good for one position.What did Sier do playing as a forward against Coburg?
I wasn't suggesting playing him as a forward. Pendlebury or Sidebottom could play in attack. Sier is good for one position.
I think he stays in too until he runs out of steam then give him a break but only for a week or 2 at the most, much prefer him playing most weeks unless (god forbid) injured or badly out of form. I would like to see Ginnevan given a go as well as he seems to have a few tricks, quite interesting times coming up for Collingwood fans and who would have thought at xmas.Thought the same at the time.
Never mind. He has some tools and while he looks to be keeping his head up and cracking in, we ought to keep him in seniors in a development year.
There is a spot available in the midfield, particularly against the Swans, for a big bodied inner mid who reads Grundy's taps. Seems to me a more important need than a mid sized forward with a skinny frame likely to generate only a few possessions a game at this stage of his career.And therein lies the problem. You're suggesting we make other changes to accommodate him. We already have so many changes week to week that another just for the sake of it makes little sense when we need to get some stability into the team. Sier will get his chance when there's a spot available in the midfield. Might even be this week if Murphy doesn't get up.
Sier is actually ranked 7th for clearances/game (2.4) this year behind both Sidey (4.14) and Pendles (4.62) who are in our top 3 at the club, and even behind Tyler Brown (2.75). Pendles and Sidey had 14 clearances between them Saturday.
Bringing in Sier to replace Henry makes no sense given we actually want/need Henry getting these development opportunities. Hopefully when Sier does his chance he can get back to something like his 4 clearances a game or better of 2018 and 2020, and push for something north of 70% game time.
I think he stays in too until he runs out of steam then give him a break but only for a week or 2 at the most, much prefer him playing most weeks unless (god forbid) injured or badly out of form. I would like to see Ginnevan given a go as well as he seems to have a few tricks, quite interesting times coming up for Collingwood fans and who would have thought at xmas.
There is a spot available in the midfield, particularly against the Swans, for a big bodied inner mid who reads Grundy's taps. Seems to me a more important need than a mid sized forward with a skinny frame likely to generate only a few possessions a game at this stage of his career.
I don’t really understand why he looks petrified out there. He’s probably already a better player at VFL level than half the dudes running around for the opposition last night and he still looked scared. Macrae also was very nervous in his games too. Just haven’t really noticed it before in our young players.
Another unfair and unbalanced assessmentHe looks undersized and lacks a competitive edge to my eye. Don't like that someone that skinny can also look that slow and weak.
I don't want him to wait because his form warrants a call up and his particular skill set is in big demand in our midfield. If he is not selected soon and given regular games I do not see him staying at the club next year, and I would have him well ahead of Tyson Brown as our main inside mid in the absence of Adams.I'm 1 of Sier's biggest supporters on these boards and I want him in the team as much as anyone. But happy for him to wait for his chance rather than artificially create 1, so happy to agree to disagree.
I don't want him to wait because his form warrants a call up and his particular skill set is in big demand in our midfield. If he is not selected soon and given regular games I do not see him staying at the club next year, and I would have him well ahead of Tyson Brown as our main inside mid in the absence of Adams.
18 year old undersized. Not the first to be in their first year and considered skinny.
Competitive Edge isn't a worry , we saw his attack earlier in the pre season with his marking ability. You don't take those type of marks if you are timid and lack competitive edge, hence why he has got games at senior level
I feel like you will be eating humble pie within a couple of years when he puts on a bit of size. As this kid looks the goods and has smarts from what ive seen
Im getting Jimmy Bartel vibes with his marking and versatility.
Absolutely, we shouldn't even be questioning the poor kid. He looks elite to me with his skill set, just a matter of confidence and time, he is going to be very hard to stop and match up on once he gets more games
Yeah I hope so too. Also hope its ok to still have an opinion.
Interesting. That may be the order (I have a different opinion, but that's beside the point), but I think more importantly I don't think any look to be certainties to make it (let's say 'making it' is playing 100 games). I think Macrae looks to me to be the best, followed by Poulter, but I think there is a bit of doubt on all of them.Oh hundred percent. Sorry did re read my post might've seemed aggressive so do apologise!!
Probably of the group , im concerned most about Rantall. But again he wasnt played in proper position on his debut. Plus still early days.
McCreery
Poulter
McRae
Henry
Rantall
Ruscoe
in that order so far of confidence in their game being good enough for afl level.
I think we need to remember the last two draft groups have had a lot less exposure at Under 18 (2020 draft group) and VFL level ( 2019 draft group). Playing Under 18s as a top ager and dominating the comp would help you develop so much more and put your confidence through the roof.
That spot goes to CrispThere is a spot available in the midfield, particularly against the Swans, for a big bodied inner mid who reads Grundy's taps.
Interesting. That may be the order (I have a different opinion, but that's beside the point), but I think more importantly I don't think any look to be certainties to make it (let's say 'making it' is playing 100 games). I think Macrae looks to me to be the best, followed by Poulter, but I think there is a bit of doubt on all of them.
He looks a bit lost at AFL level but looks good at VFL level... probably needs to develop in the seconds.
I think he's gonna be a good player though.
VFL will do nothing for him. The pace is different. How many goals and marks do you want him to take? lol He just needs to get used to the AFL pace, and with more games he will.He looks a bit lost at AFL level but looks good at VFL level... probably needs to develop in the seconds.
I think he's gonna be a good player though.
VFL will do nothing for him. The pace is different. How many goals and marks do you want him to take? lol He just needs to get used to the AFL pace, and with more games he will.
I just want him to play a role that suits his strength. I don’t rate his type in the forward line.VFL will do nothing for him. The pace is different. How many goals and marks do you want him to take? lol He just needs to get used to the AFL pace, and with more games he will.
Stephenson wasn’t much of an aerialist but his pace allowed him separation so he was such a threat on the lead. I haven’t seen that from Henry yet. But even then I’d say Stephenson is much better utilised on the wing.He'll be fine in the forward line. Same height as Stevo, and is more of a contested mark.
Once he adjusts to the pace, he'll be okay.
VFL will do nothing for him. The pace is different. How many goals and marks do you want him to take? lol He just needs to get used to the AFL pace, and with more games he will.
I'm no judge of the kids and haven't seen much, but it looks like a really good group. I like the chances of a fair few of them in this order:Oh hundred percent. Sorry did re read my post might've seemed aggressive so do apologise!!
Probably of the group , im concerned most about Rantall. But again he wasnt played in proper position on his debut. Plus still early days.
McCreery
Poulter
McRae
Henry
Rantall
Ruscoe
in that order so far of confidence in their game being good enough for afl level.
I think we need to remember the last two draft groups have had a lot less exposure at Under 18 (2020 draft group) and VFL level ( 2019 draft group). Playing Under 18s as a top ager and dominating the comp would help you develop so much more and put your confidence through the roof.