Remove this Banner Ad

Ongoing Test match XI speculation thread.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Hardly

Lets be real he was a replacement batsman ONLY. Wasn't even in the squad.
In the context of having Burns playing in front of him he is very stiff
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Nice to hear we are starting the test with 10 players.

It'd be just awesome being an opener in the Australian squad knowing you weren't picked over a guy averaging single digits in recent months

So are India if Shaw plays ahead of Shubman Gill
 
Yet you want the bowlers changed because incumbency doesn’t suit there!

Internal consistency has never been one of LPs strong suits
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Burns playing is actually unbelievable, you could pick every other opener in state cricket over him at the moment and you’d be better off. The guy is so horrendously out of form and confidence it’s not funny.

Legit borderline angry at the insanity of him playing.
 
So you think we are batting 2nd and after the nightwatchman then?

Backing the openers to last half a session as ugly as it may be. Not as if Harris won't flash at one anyway and probably nick off.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Pattinson is the incumbent

Only because Starc was rested (which was beyond dumb!). As if we aren't playing our best pink ball bowler. If Starc bowls rubbish in Adelaide by all means play Pattinson in Melbourne. He gets the conditions he excels at in Adelaide but he's no moral for the whole series, needs to perform. The other two are our best two quicks by a mile.
 
Only because Starc was rested (which was beyond dumb!). As if we aren't playing our best pink ball bowler. If Starc bowls rubbish in Adelaide by all means play Pattinson in Melbourne. He gets the conditions he excels at in Adelaide but he's no moral for the whole series, needs to perform. The other two are our best two quicks by a mile.
Hazlewood didn't play
 
Only because Starc was rested (which was beyond dumb!). As if we aren't playing our best pink ball bowler. If Starc bowls rubbish in Adelaide by all means play Pattinson in Melbourne. He gets the conditions he excels at in Adelaide but he's no moral for the whole series, needs to perform. The other two are our best two quicks by a mile.

Starc also played the last game alongside Patto and Cummins

But you’re right, Hazlewoods average of 0.13 better than Patto makes him a far superior bowler...
 
Starc also played the last game alongside Patto and Cummins

But you’re right, Hazlewoods average of 0.13 better than Patto makes him a far superior bowler...

Hazelwod gives us variety as a tall bowler who can bowl long spells you need that. Would easily be the second picked behind Cummins. Starc gets the first test, it's a pink ball test and the bloke is elite at them. However if he doesn't bowl well drop him for Melbourne, no issues.
 
So we have a guy averaging almost 70 over the last 3 shield seasons as an opener who got 91 runs at 30 in the lead up games on tricky wickets.

But we don't pick him and instead go for a guy who has never opened in first class cricket in his life to partner a guy who has scored 61 runs at under 7 this season. That's insane and Harris should be disgusted.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Ongoing Test match XI speculation thread.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top