Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by jc67
Ottens will be signing a new contract with Richmond!
One of Wallace's demands.
Richmond will make a play for Judd BIG TIME.
IMO If that fails I think McLeod could also be in their sights.
Originally posted by crows98
if the crows want him, they should offer him $500,000 a season for 4 years......screw richmond and make them up there anti
Originally posted by crows98
If they want Mcleod, 2 top ten picks will be just for starters.
Originally posted by Bresh
Did you know that you actually have to offer something worthwhile in a trade?
Originally posted by Bresh
How ironic coming from "crows98". You'd be lucky to get one, straight-up. Other than that, it would be a pretty handy player and a later pick.
Originally posted by spindoctor
Yeh, whatever. If Carey can go for picks 4 and 20 at age 32, McLeod can easily go for two first rounders you stupid fool. Adelaide may have overpaid for Carey, but a player with the reputation of McLeod demands a high price.
Originally posted by spindoctor
I mean listen to you, parroting Ottens' value when he's produced even less than McLeod.
Originally posted by spindoctor
Yes but the player's past has a lot to do with it.
Johnstone has stunning skills but you're hardly going to trade him for anywhere near as much as McLeod are you?
Their past is EVERYTHING when it comes to the trade, because you have no idea what they're going to prouce in the future.
For pete's sake...
Originally posted by Bresh
Did you know that you actually have to offer something worthwhile in a trade?
We sign him for $500,000 a year; if Richmond doesn’t trade him he goes into the pre season draft with that price tag on him head. He should become a great player with a club that can offer stability.
How ironic coming from "crows98". You'd be lucky to get one, straight-up. Other than that, it would be a pretty handy player and a later pick.
Originally posted by crows98
With McLeod what are we going to ask for eggs and milk, if he want to go and says l want to be traded to Richmond then the AFC has to play hardball, you want him, you give us what we want
Originally posted by Bresh
No club will ever give two top ten picks for Andrew McLeod 2004. If that is the asking price that you set, Richmond will take their chances on the draft.
Certain, Wallace has a bit to do before he signs off on his appointment, All relating to the list and future players.Originally posted by wrennyboy
Are you sure about this jc67? We havnet even gotten wallace yet. Would love to get judd. Whats ur source
Originally posted by jc67
Wallace is a snake and I am very very glad that he is out of it for us. I just hope that he is not contacted by anyone who will clue him in about Adelaide’s true public opinion or it all could be ruined….. macca23 who was that call from?
Originally posted by Bresh
So do you think potential suitors would disregard his last two seasons and pay for the McLeod of 2-3 years ago... not to mention the fact they'd have to gut their team to gain a second top ten pick?
Do you think that Michael Voss would command a higher trade price than Chris Judd?
Originally posted by spindoctor
And yes, Voss would command a higher price. He is one of the greatest players in the history of the game, a true leader of men, can inspire a team by just being on the field and embodies everything good about football. If for some ridiculous reason Brisbane were willing to let him go, he would gain a higher price than Judd - but not for rebuilding teams obviously. It depends what the target market is. The target market for Voss would be finals teams close to the 'premiership hour'.
Originally posted by spindoctor
You're a class idiot who knows nothing about football if you think Voss wouldn't command a huge price!
Originally posted by Bresh
Ah dear. You are beyond help. Thankfully the likes of Stiffy and dyertribe actually are within the realm of sanity... Comparing this to our earlier situation, why would a rebuilidng team therefore pay over the moon for Andrew McLeod?
This has clearly gone through th ekeepers hands and into the net.Originally posted by spindoctor
You're a class idiot who knows nothing about football if you think Voss wouldn't command a huge price!
Have you seen him play this year? He's barely got a ****ing knee and he's still playing beautifully...he's courage and leadership personified.
Originally posted by Bresh
Ah dear. You are beyond help. Thankfully the likes of Stiffy and dyertribe actually are within the realm of sanity... Comparing this to our earlier situation, why would a rebuilidng team therefore pay over the moon for Andrew McLeod?
Originally posted by crows98
Why do we want to trade him anyway?
Originally posted by Bresh
Do you think Richmond, continuing as an example, would prefer to give Brad Ottens and their first-round pick for 2 years of Michael Voss or 12 of Chris Judd?
Originally posted by spindoctor
Nice to see you don't read my posts, dimwit. What I clearly said was, more would be paid for Voss, but only by a team that is not rebuilding - he would a perfect fit for one close to a premiership.
Melbourne, Geelong, Port, would all pay high prices to get Voss. Essendon probably even more.