our best 22.

[Tarkyn_24]

Interesting to see Rusling omitted from your selection, smiddaz. I'm assuming that this is because of his string of shoulder injuries and that he's only had two or three games that standout in the memory banks?

Agree re: Rocca, I had him down as an interchange player at best from now on, but of course, I forgot Swan. Will be used in a mentoring capacity for Dawes?

 

[smiddaz123]

Interesting to see Rusling omitted from your selection, smiddaz. I'm assuming that this is because of his string of shoulder injuries and that he's only had two or three games that standout in the memory banks?

Agree re: Rocca, I had him down as an interchange player at best from now on, but of course, I forgot Swan. Will be used in a mentoring capacity for Dawes?

Rusling is a good depth player, but I find him too one dimensional to be a regular performer.

Plus, I think we should be playing the forwards that are the better kicks at goal (Anthony, MacAffer and Dawes are all much better set shots than Rusling). Exception is unless the player is vital, such as Cloke.

He's a depth player in my book.

 

[Keele]

Quote:
Originally Posted by CollingwoodKing
Presti has done little for the club and is to old.
They should see if they could trade him for a big forward to take Roccas spot when he retires.


Don't know whether to laugh or cry when I read this sort of stuff.

What in gods name are you thinking ... too old and you expect to gain a F/F... name him or a club silly enough to trade (Fremantle exempted )

Besides that take a look at how many key forward prospects we have that I would not even consider trading for a Presti equal