supernova_
Premiership Player
Look forward to reading the debrief Tues evening guys and gals!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Questions I would like answered at the forum
Q1, If the standards were so low in the first years as seemed to of been confirmed by ex players (Brown) and current (JOM) why was this not recognised and dealt with immediately.
Q2, if sub standard commitment is accepted in the playing group by the football dept and the board why should commitment been shown by the members?
Q3, what was the point of giving up pick 3 and 10 in the last draft for 6 and (currently) 10 this year. Both picks will now be lost to secure the required points for Bowes, points that could of been from 2nd round picks.
Q4, why did the club paint itself into a corner by stating that Harley WILL be traded, leaving no room to manoeuvre and proving a poor outcome
Still a lot of water to go under the bridge ... but prepared to bet Bowes won't go number one - and Melbourne won't make the eight . But we coould have two Academy players selected in the first round - so the Melbourne pick will be helpful in that regard. Think bids will come early on both our players so we can't pinch a 'better' Victorian ......Q3, Originally I liked the idea of getting Demons pick in 2017 draft but now I'm thinking what was the strategy behind this given Bowes was a top prospect. Now those picks are almost useless to us - could of had Oliver and Ah Chee this year.
Still a lot of water to go under the bridge ... but prepared to bet Bowes won't go number one - and Melbourne won't make the eight . But we coould have two Academy players selected in the first round - so the Melbourne pick will be helpful in that regard. Think bids will come early on both our players so we can't pinch a 'better' Victorian ......
I think the answer to 4 was that the club couldn't keep allowing his behavior to continue especially after saying he was on a last chance. The club would have looked really poor if they didn't say he was 'fired' after the last incident.Questions I would like answered at the forum
Q1, If the standards were so low in the first years as seemed to of been confirmed by ex players (Brown) and current (JOM) why was this not recognised and dealt with immediately.
Q2, if sub standard commitment is accepted in the playing group by the football dept and the board why should commitment been shown by the members?
Q3, what was the point of giving up pick 3 and 10 in the last draft for 6 and (currently) 10 this year. Both picks will now be lost to secure the required points for Bowes, points that could of been from 2nd round picks.
Q4, why did the club paint itself into a corner by stating that Harley WILL be traded, leaving no room to manoeuvre and proving a poor outcome
Even if Bowes goes the immediate pick before ours points have to come from the Demons pick to make up the difference so it will drop down the order. At the moment this swap decision looks stupid.Still a lot of water to go under the bridge ... but prepared to bet Bowes won't go number one - and Melbourne won't make the eight . But we coould have two Academy players selected in the first round - so the Melbourne pick will be helpful in that regard. Think bids will come early on both our players so we can't pinch a 'better' Victorian ......
Even if Bowes goes the immediate pick before ours points have to come from the Demons pick to make up the difference so it will drop down the order. At the moment this swap decision looks stupid.
The only out is for us to swap it for a player but even then we would of done better last year pick looks like being around 10 but gave up 3 for 6. In fact we likely could of have Oliver at 3 and Achee at 10 last year plus pick up Bowes and Sheer this year without wasting the demons pick. I know I am ranting but ATM this is just a **** up, I hope Clayton has something up his sleeve that we can't see
Question for GCFC Management.
- Why do we have to use NMFC medical staff instead of our own for David Swallow? It's been reported and quoted by Ashcroft. Do we not have an adequate medical/doctor team? What is being done about this?
Makes me think the worstQuestion for GCFC Management.
- Why do we have to use NMFC medical staff instead of our own for David Swallow? It's been reported and quoted by Ashcroft. Do we not have an adequate medical/doctor team? What is being done about this?
I don't understand the concern here. We can't possibly have the best medical experts for all injury types. My doctor is excellent but even he will refer me to a specialist for certain matters. We sent Jaeger overseas to the world's best but sending David to North's crew is David not happy with our Docs? If anything North are to be commended for allowing us access to their experts.Question for GCFC Management.
- Why do we have to use NMFC medical staff instead of our own for David Swallow? It's been reported and quoted by Ashcroft. Do we not have an adequate medical/doctor team? What is being done about this?
Jaeger was a freak injury unheard of in AFL, only 1 other case in Chris Knights I think it was from Richmond.I don't understand the concern here. We can't possibly have the best medical experts for all injury types. My doctor is excellent but even he will refer me to a specialist for certain matters. We sent Jaeger overseas to the world's best but sending David to North's crew is David not happy with our Docs? If anything North are to be commended for allowing us access to their experts.