List Mgmt. Part 3- And on it goes: The trade and draft megathread

[Nedland]

I’m not too sure we will be trading it back to the Swans, surely the AFL would frown upon something like that considering the Swans have only just gotten back into the good books

 

[dodgie]

We trade it back and sydney don’t have to use 26 in matching. So we do them a favour.

This wouldn't get past the integrity unit at the AFL surely.

 

[KBLT]

I fully expected them to go for Blakey there

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

Im sure we will be trading back that pick to sydney with a small profit

Maybe our2019 3rd plus one of their late 30s picks for 26 and 60

 

[Patron]

For an absolute draft noob, the proposal here? We make this trade, Sydney do what they have to do, we ship it straight back to them for what exactly?

Their third round next year, their second next year, some other later pick. I'm sure we make a profit from this, question is how much.

 

[AndysAngels]

We don't actually have pick 26 guys, i'm sure we are trading it back or something else.

How do people think we have just traded in 26 for ~50?? Obviously some strings attached! We're good but not that good

 

[Hai_Newman]

I for one welcome our new biatches and with much sadness pass on the baton...

 

[WCE1698]

first surprise of the draft besides us lol

 

[HoneyBadger35]

Probably trade it for a 2019 3rd round or something?

So we just hold the pick for an hour or two and send it back after the fact? Seems like draft tampering, also don’t see what’s in it for us?

 

[Biggie]

North now has the unwanted record of having to match the highest bid for a father-son (Luke McDonald at pick 8) and NGA player (Thomas at pick 8).

 

[JoshWoodenSpoon]

Even if we simply gain a slight bonus after the Blakey match and presumably restoration trade, how good is it to seemingly be savvy mofos these days??

 

[HurleyHepsHird]

GWS will take Clarke surely?

 

[RookiePick]

Radelaide doing us a solid and trolling Swans. Not bad at all.

 

[twce13]

Im sure we will be trading back that pick to sydney with a small profit

No. It's just that at the point in draft 26 was no longer beneficial with a bid. Adelaide threats of bid scared them at 8 and eagles pounces at 7.

 

[Patron]

Ahhh so 26 was essentially worthless to Sydney so they got something for it while they could

False, they could have traded pick 26 for a second rounder next year. There will be more to it and I reckon we trade it back after blakely is gone.

 

[LewyBroome]

Mick Ablett has one of the most annoying heads/voices for a pundit

 

[happy_eagle]

20, 22 and 26 is an awesome spot to be in at the end of the first day's drafting.

Lots of work on the phones overnight.

The draft is more than 1 day ?

 

[KBLT]

Here we go

 

[ClayB]

Gillon you DH

 

[twce13]

False, they could have traded pick 26 for a second rounder next year. There will be more to it and I reckon we trade it back after blakely is gone.

You're wrong .

Laughable that would get past the AFL integrity team.

 

[KBLT]

The draft is more than 1 day ?

The first round is tonight, the rest and the rookie draft are tomorrow at like midday.

 

[HurleyHepsHird]

Hmmmmm maybe Sydney will trade back for 26.

 

[Hai_Newman]

going in with cluster bomb approach into the 2nd Round..shades of last year...IN VOSSO WE TRUST

 

[squashface]

Blakey has been bid on so we will see what happens with 26 after I suppose

 

[ep2018]

Good point about the trade. We probably will swap picks again with Sydney and get a third rounder for our troubles, and a heap of good will. AFL will be livid tho.