Lol Richmond supporters.should close the thread dusty clearly the better player. main difference, dusty is a team player who brings players into the game and improves teammates, danger is 'me me me' and will do anything for a cheap stat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Lol Richmond supporters.should close the thread dusty clearly the better player. main difference, dusty is a team player who brings players into the game and improves teammates, danger is 'me me me' and will do anything for a cheap stat
Dusty because he can kick an 80m torp that ends in a goal. And no other player in the league would have done that.
Round 1 this year.
Wheres Danger's premiership medal and Norm Smith champ?Lol Richmond supporters.
It's coming champ.Wheres Danger's premiership medal and Norm Smith champ?
Funny coming from a Geelong supporterLol Richmond supporters.
Not that funny- I can actually appreciate both these players-apparently lots of tiger fans can't. How bizarre.Funny coming from a Geelong supporter
Houli was BOG in the granny.Wheres Danger's premiership medal and Norm Smith champ?
what? He's on the grass... no way..Dusty is 10 NFL fields ahead of Dangerfield as both a footballer and a person.
Plus he is a funny bugger whereas Dangerfield is as funny as watching paint dry.
Rubbish. Absolute rubbish.Danger is still the better player he is better at basically every aspect of the game.
No he wasn't. If we were judging players by their own standards, I'd agree. Just for one minute imagine if Houli had Dusty's stats of 29 possessions of which 22 were contested. It would be hailed as one of the greatest GF performances of recent times. Yet because Dusty did it and didn't have that little bit more outside polish he usually displays, people downplay it. I've watched the replay many times and really got to see the impact Dusty had in winning the game for us through his inside work. He often would take two or more crows out of the game as they would pounce in him but still release the ball out to our advantage. Even Houli's goal was set up by Dusty.Houli was BOG in the granny.
Chill out.
Good for you. Many would disagree though including 18 AFL coaches and the majority of his peers. LMAO, what would they know?Dangerfield has been better for longer, and I'd take him over Dusty. Hell I'd take Sloane or Bont over him.
It's coming champ.
Ps Martin was in best 3 on ground in gf-was he best? Nope.
Still, can't fault his season but keep calm old boy.
Only if Frank Costa pays his mother a fortune to work for him just like Dangers.....It's a shame we will never get the privilege of seeing Martin alongside Gaz, Duncan, Selwood and Danger like we will in 2019 with Sloane
Good for you. Many would disagree though including 18 AFL coaches and the majority of his peers. LMAO, what would they know?
You are only as good as your last year....You mean in 2017? Yeah, Martin was the best player. Is he the best player in the competition? Nope. Dangerfield is, he's done it for longer.
You are only as good as your last year....
You agreed Dusty was the best player forYou mean in 2017? Yeah, Martin was the best player. Is he the best player in the competition? Nope. Dangerfield is, he's done it for longer.
Lol.
Is Ablett the best footballer in the competition? No. Not anymore.
Is Fyfe the best footballer in the competition? No. Not any more.
Following that logic the player with the best recent year (2017) is the current best footballer in the competition. We are not saying the best player over their whole career. That's a very different discussion.
should close the thread dusty clearly the better player. main difference, dusty is a team player who brings players into the game and improves teammates, danger is 'me me me' and will do anything for a cheap stat