Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

[Corn Cobbers]

The better player will be Dangerfield but it's a weird one, a bit like Sam Mitchell, if you could choose between Dangerfield or Pendlebury and both are in their prime, I'm taking Pendlebury. Not as brilliant and doesn't kick goals but his impact to the team was quite profound.

Yeah agreed

 

[Seeds]

Scientific observation hahahaha. Yeah okay professor

so what answer were you looking for then?

you complain about a lack of scientific analysis and then mock the very concept of it.

 

[BLUEALLTHRU]

Pendles.

 

[staffonly]

Danger for me. Impact is far greater. Pendles is a great player though and would be more than happy with either.

 

[Seeds]

The better player will be Dangerfield but it's a weird one, a bit like Sam Mitchell, if you could choose between Dangerfield or Pendlebury and both are in their prime, I'm taking Pendlebury. Not as brilliant and doesn't kick goals but his impact to the team was quite profound.

In what season did pendlebury have an impact on the team that was like dangerfields 2016 and 2017?

 

[My Tilly]

In what season did pendlebury have an impact on the team that was like dangerfields 2016 and 2017?

Just think Pendlebury's been a bit more consistent and has always been the superior user of the ball. Makes all the right choices and has delivered in big games more often than what Dangerfield has.
No doubt Danger's 2016-2017 years were off the chart.

 

[adammania9]

I don’t think Pendlebury has had seasons as good as Dangerfield’s 2016 and 17, but his 2011 and 2013 seasons wouldn’t be far off. There was only one midfielder running around that was better than Pendlebury in those years and it was GAJ

 

[loki04]

Just think Pendlebury's been a bit more consistent and has always been the superior user of the ball. Makes all the right choices and has delivered in big games more often than what Dangerfield has.
No doubt Danger's 2016-2017 years were off the chart.

Pendles biggest draw back is he isn't a momentum changing player.

Danger is much like Buckley was or Martin/petracca, their ability to throw the team on the back and swing the game back in their teams favour off their own backs.

Pendles is a champion and extremely consistent but imo not able to impact a game against the flow like those type of players level.

 

[Gone Critical]

Pendles has Swan covered no question.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Swan at his best had Pendles covered. Pendles has the longevity. Like all the really great mids Swanny was a goal kicking danger something Pendles has never really done.

 

[Gratees]

I would probably take Pendles, Just so reliable, you know what youre gonna get every week

 

[Bunnings]

Geez, I guess it really is a popularity contest

 

[beerbandit]

Pendles but that’s my Collingwood bias and who really cares, both will go into Hall of Fame

 

[Daka]

Danger has clearly been the better individual player

 

[beerbandit]

Danger has clearly been the better individual player

The poll suggests otherwise