- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Posts
- 22,475
- Reaction score
- 12,020
- Location
- Pluto
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- TOO
- Banned
- #26
Yep he would be the bloke you bring in for an under performing Edwards. Dangerfields avg disposal efficiency in 2012 is 67.67% compared to Edwards at 68.89% with Jackson at 72.62%
Yep a depth player that would cost way too much.
Do you really believe in that BS dude? So by those figures you are suggesting that if the 3 of them were put on a trade table, the comp would be falling over themselves offering the world for Hackson and if they missed out on him, after they had slit their wrists, they would then get down on their knees pleading for us to do the deal for Edwards. In the mean time Dangerfield is signing a 5 year deal with Southport seeing as he knows he has no chance in the AFL....get ****ing real FFS...some of you guys are embarassing with some of the shit you come up with...and I am not a big fan of Dnagerfield either, its the ****ing ridicoulous stupidity that you offer as comparisons...











