sr36
TheBrownDog
Anzac was being smutty.Sorry mate I was being sarcastic - just playing on the hysterical vitriol here, that’s invariably directed at Hine with any recruitment issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Anzac was being smutty.Sorry mate I was being sarcastic - just playing on the hysterical vitriol here, that’s invariably directed at Hine with any recruitment issue.
Started his Collingwood career with a bang, then had a bad game, and since then has been pretty solid consistent and serviceable. Early days but he’s easily best 22 at this point in time.
You can be sure someone’s going to finger Hine for the stuff up.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
As someone over that age, it was much more commonly used in that sense in the 70s and 80s than it is now.You're clearly over 40...
As someone over that age, it was much more commonly used in that sense in the 70s and 80s than it is now.
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
I started the Lockyer comparison - but I was thinking more about skillsets than level of performance. However, I didn't rate Lockyer anywhere near as highly as you, so I think Lockyer is achievable for Lipinski.There were comments earlier comparing Lipinski to Lockyer. Now for me Lockyer is probably in the top 30-40 players over the last 25 years. Slightly behind players like OBrien, Maxwell, Prestigiacomo and Elliott but slightly in front of players like Toovey, Goldsack and Reid. For me Lockyer is level with players like Ben Johnson, Leon Davis and Shane Wakelin. Great player and if Lipinski gets close to that I would be very happy.
Fair enough in terms of the rating. He was a favourite of mine despite loosing contests at times. Most of us remember the Farmer incident. Neat player and he played over 200 games. If he had managed to make it into the 2010 team he would be remembered much more fondly.I started the Lockyer comparison - but I was thinking more about skillsets than level of performance. However, I didn't rate Lockyer anywhere near as highly as you, so I think Lockyer is achievable for Lipinski.
Bloody neat player in a time when we were a shambles.Fair enough in terms of the rating. He was a favourite of mine despite loosing contests at times. Most of us remember the Farmer incident. Neat player and he played over 200 games. If he had managed to make it into the 2010 team he would be remembered much more fondly.
Not sure I agree with that. I think Lip is more consistent in disposal quality, but some of Crisp’s disposals following his drive through the midfield are terrific. His goal on the weekend an example.Yeah 20 touches from Lip will hurt teams more then 40 from Crisp.
Would just like him to get 6/7 more touches a game sit around that 26 touches per games.
You're clearly over 40...
Now for me Lockyer is probably in the top 30-40 players over the last 25 years… but slightly in front of players like….Reid.
I realise that and given your past comments on Lipinski I took it as such. For me it’s by a bit like a guy kicking 12 goals in a half of footy then the opposition switching defenders and he gets 3 in the second half. He literally set the AFL record for the most disposals in a half the only way from there is down.Its not a knock on Lipinski just pointing out using a stat that is right at the extremes of the range is one thats not likely to be reproduced no matter what
Same for me. It’s a high bar, but he’s not that far off currently that it’s unobtainable and we know his best is good enough. Maybe it’s as simple as him finding that best effort every 5-6 weeks in 2022 to elevate himself again.Duncan is a great comparison.
If he can raise his game to that level I’ll be very happy.
The fickle finger of fate?
Reid always had more talent in fact he would be top 5 for the pies over the last 25 years, but he just never stringed it together due to injury apart from 2010-13. Loved him as a player but he did cost us the 2011 grand final not that it was his fault but maybe my subconscious cant forgive him. But I can understand why most would rate him above Lockyer. If I had to list them in order from best to worst players over the last 25 years they would be in a very similar space.Nice to see you on BF, Tarkyn
There is no way you are in front of All Australian KPP Ben Reid
Agreed. Lippa is being asked to perform a more inside mid role whereas I feel his talent is more suited as an outside mid. His hands are elite and I rate him. My only slight on him is that he appears to dislike the 'rough stuff'. I would have him in my best 22 every week, though.I was saying to someone at the game. With Lippa its quality over quantity. Like that kick to the middle to Grundy. Not something anyone would be able to do.
And thats what he is good at. I don't think we need to analyse every single game he has, good or bad.
Reid always had more talent in fact he would be top 5 for the pies over the last 25 years, but he just never stringed it together due to injury apart from 2010-13. Loved him as a player but he he did cost us the 2011 grand final not that it was his fault but maybe my subconscious cant forgive him. But I can understand why most would rate him above Lockyer. If I had to list them in order from best to worst players over the last 25 years they would be in a very similar space.
On the edge of the top 5 if he didn't have the issues he had. Pendles, Buckley, Swan, Cloke, Burns, Clement, A Rocca, Williams near the bottom of this list of players.top 5? that's a big call.