Player Watch Patrick Lipinski

[Cousin of Daicos]

I think you mean against Melbourne, he played last week against the Saints.

Oops yeah. Sorry

 

[PonsfordMagpie]

The decision to shift him to a high half forward role is paying dividends.

Third consecutive game he's kicked 2 goals.

 

[3rdMan]

I'm sure Beau is he just hasn't had the minimum 30 kicks required by that table

After round 10 Beau was best in the league for retaining possession for kicks inside 50 at 80% with 26 kicks. A bit different than marks, but he would have over 30 kicks by now.

 

[BillyElliott]

Slide 2 & 3

 

[Jen2310]

Slide 2 & 3

But but lippa doesn’t tackle…

 

[BillyElliott]

But but lippa doesn’t tackle…

Was thinking exactly this as I posted it

 

[jimmy35]

I honestly didn't think much of this until the Hawthorn game. It really stood out against the Hawks and then his absence was noticed even more against the Saints where our inside 50 entries were a bit shit

That’s a surprise.

 

[Mick F]

Slide 2 & 3

His delivery inside 50 is quite good.

 

[Anzacday]

But but lippa doesn’t tackle…

It was brilliant because he waited for Baker to dip for the free and then tackled him.

 

[ZEV]

It was brilliant because he waited for Baker to dip for the free and then tackled him.

I swear there was another incident in the game where he anticipated the duck into the tackle and corrected for it as well.

Really intelligent by Lippa, I was worried that he might not have the pace for the Hill, McReery, Shoota replacement but he and Sully did really well.

 

[901023]

But but lippa doesn’t tackle…

You're right Jen! But I thought he tackled well this game. Good to see him respond to my feedback He got my 5 votes in the Didaka!

 

[manicpie]

The beautiful man is going along nicely

 

[gouki88]

The beautiful man is going along nicely

Career-best form for me. 18 disposals and ~2 goals a game over his last 4 games

 

[manicpie]

Career-best form for me. 18 disposals and ~2 goals a game over his last 4 games

His delivery inside 50 is tantalising. Good player

 

[gouki88]

His delivery inside 50 is tantalising. Good player

He & Houston would be dreams to lead up to.

 

[Pistol Night]

The beautiful man is going along nicely

Thanks mate, any thoughts on Lippas form?

 

[manicpie]

Thanks mate, any thoughts on Lippas form?

No idea about this Lippa bloke. It was directed at you handsome

 

[Fat Jesus]

No idea about this Lippa bloke. It was directed at you handsome

Get a room you two.

 

[BEEG]

When he is fit and confident he is a star.

 

[Jen2310]

Lippa is the 3rd biggest riser from round 10

3 – Patrick Lipinski

1

Patrick Lipinski

Age

27

Ht

190cm

Wt

86kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

18.0

4star

K

7.8

3star

HB

10.2

5star

M

3.5

4star

T

2.8

4star

CL

1.5

4star

D

18.3

4star

K

7.0

3star

HB

11.3

5star

M

2.5

3star

T

2.7

4star

CL

1.3

4star

D

15.2

4star

K

6.6

3star

HB

8.6

5star

M

2.4

3star

T

2.4

4star

CL

1.2

4star

(Collingwood)
“Inside the top 30 players in the comp the last six weeks, (was) outside the top 150.”

 

[901023]

Lippa is the 3rd biggest riser from round 10

3 – Patrick Lipinski (Collingwood)
“Inside the top 30 players in the comp the last six weeks, (was) outside the top 150.”

Jen2310 – I get that Champion Data provides one way of assessing player performance, but we also have to remember that statistics are only as good as the assumptions behind them, and the people collecting and interpreting the data.

If the model weights certain actions or roles more heavily than others, it can paint a very skewed picture. And unless you’ve been in the box coaching a premiership team—or even just following the game closely—you’ll know that some of the “top-rated” players according to Champion Data don’t always pass the eye test.

For example, they’ve listed two Bulldogs players in the top three, and neither is Bontempelli, who most would agree is their most impactful player. St Kilda having two of the top six also raises eyebrows. And Nick Daicos not making the top 10, despite being heavily tagged every week, just doesn’t align with what we see on the field.

Stats can be helpful, but context matters. Champion Data's player ratings, IMO, don't pass the eye test.

 

[gouki88]

Jen2310 – I get that Champion Data provides one way of assessing player performance, but we also have to remember that statistics are only as good as the assumptions behind them, and the people collecting and interpreting the data.

If the model weights certain actions or roles more heavily than others, it can paint a very skewed picture. And unless you’ve been in the box coaching a premiership team—or even just following the game closely—you’ll know that some of the “top-rated” players according to Champion Data don’t always pass the eye test.

For example, they’ve listed two Bulldogs players in the top three, and neither is Bontempelli, who most would agree is their most impactful player. St Kilda having two of the top six also raises eyebrows. And Nick Daicos not making the top 10, despite being heavily tagged every week, just doesn’t align with what we see on the field.

Stats can be helpful, but context matters. Champion Data's player ratings, IMO, don't pass the eye test.

CD is much more useful IMO for team-related metrics. Their individual stuff is noisy

 

[jmac70]

Jen2310 – I get that Champion Data provides one way of assessing player performance, but we also have to remember that statistics are only as good as the assumptions behind them, and the people collecting and interpreting the data.

If the model weights certain actions or roles more heavily than others, it can paint a very skewed picture. And unless you’ve been in the box coaching a premiership team—or even just following the game closely—you’ll know that some of the “top-rated” players according to Champion Data don’t always pass the eye test.

For example, they’ve listed two Bulldogs players in the top three, and neither is Bontempelli, who most would agree is their most impactful player. St Kilda having two of the top six also raises eyebrows. And Nick Daicos not making the top 10, despite being heavily tagged every week, just doesn’t align with what we see on the field.

Stats can be helpful, but context matters. Champion Data's player ratings, IMO, don't pass the eye test.

I’ve changed my mind on your use of bold font. Just reading it alone enables the reader to decipher the main message and not have to wade through the remaining tripe.

 

[northcotehead]

I've been bagging him for years. He's put in 4 consecutive above average shifts and last night's display of laser passing was elite. I may have seen the light on Lippa.

 

[3rdMan]

Laid a really nice tackle and took a good, strong mark against the Blues. Along with Nick's contested mark, it was a real unicorn night.