Paul Licuria
- Thread starter The Clokes
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Can Stevens, Buckley, Licuria, O'Bree, Woewodin, Burns, Lockyer play in the same team with Holland sometimes tagging?
I agree but Port don't seem to
No chance, Melbourne would need Lockyer or O'Bree
If we give up licuria for steven i will ****en crack it, licuria is so much tougher and so much more valuable for collingwood. Stevens maybe be a better over all player, but licuria feeding possesion getters like buckly, scotland, obree and tarkyn lockyar who will be bck in the side. So we might trade him, but i really dont think we should.
- Feb 19, 2003
- 1,195
- 5
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Thread starter
- #29
port have no room in their salary cap for Licuria.
Clokes, Licuria wont be traded for a number of reasons. The main reason is that they arent going to trade 2001,2002 copeland winner. Licuria is a very motivational player at the pies, and has a lot of respect on and off the track.
If Collingwood gets Stevens, it will be because of either of these scenarios- (remember that Port arent going to sign a big name.)
1)Collingwood will give port their draft pick and either scotland, bretheras or mcgough (maybe a couple of them)
2.)or they will trade a number of those three players with other clubs hoping to get another draft pick. Ideally they would trade off mgough and rupes for a mid round draft pick, keep that and give port scotland (even though it will **** me off) and a first round draft pick.
That is what will happen in my opinion ifwe are able to obtain Stevens.
Port will probably want our pick 17, and w'ell have to trade around for another one
If Collingwood gets Stevens, it will be because of either of these scenarios- (remember that Port arent going to sign a big name.)
1)Collingwood will give port their draft pick and either scotland, bretheras or mcgough (maybe a couple of them)
2.)or they will trade a number of those three players with other clubs hoping to get another draft pick. Ideally they would trade off mgough and rupes for a mid round draft pick, keep that and give port scotland (even though it will **** me off) and a first round draft pick.
That is what will happen in my opinion ifwe are able to obtain Stevens.
Port will probably want our pick 17, and w'ell have to trade around for another one
In your deal Licca goes to Melbourne anyways so it dont matter..
Licuria isn't going anywhere. That's all I've got to say on the matter.
If collingwood trade Licuria to get Stevens then they will have a hard time making the GF next season. You can't have a team full of outside midfielders. I would of thought that Licka was untouchable.
carringbush
Team Captain
Your right on the money gosaints, Lica wont be going anywhere except to training to get ready for 2004 collingwood campaing
).licuria wouldn't have even been considered for trade. You don't trade a tough in and under for a reciever! I'm almost happy to keep playing scotland over stevens (scotland is very underrated - just not given the game time - absolute ball magnet). I'd prefer to not have stevens than lose someone like licuria. Destroys the club culture if u get rid of your club champions like licuria
- Banned
- #39
We'll give you Koops and a second round pick
Il tell u right now. We (port) dont want mcgough, obree or bethares. They are all ****. We would take licca tho, but no room in salary cap, i think we will trade with mebourne and get a pick + Scotty thompson who is a port boy and might wana come home
just common snse buddy, be honest about it, port will want someone better than one of those three!
- Feb 19, 2003
- 1,195
- 5
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Thread starter
- #43
why do you think I've been saying trade Licuria.... you need to trade something good, to get something good!
Port01
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Port Adelaide - Riley Bonner Player Sponsor 2016
Port Adelaide - Brendon AhChee Player Sponsor 2014
Port Adelaide - Jarrad Redden Player Sponsor 2014
Port Adelaide - Matthew Broadbent Player Sponsor 2013
Port Adelaide - Captains Club 2012 Sponsor
Port Adelaide - John Butcher 2012 Player Sponsor
Betheras has absolutely no trade value whatsoever.
Collingwood don't even want him.
He will be in the pre-season draft if anyone does want him.
Why you'd trade any kind of pick for a player Collingwood are delisting is beyond me.
You don't see all us trying to trade Kingsley or Cockatoo-Collins off.
If you offer a trade, and it is something you don't mind losing, you haven't offered enough, basically.
Collingwood don't even want him.
He will be in the pre-season draft if anyone does want him.
Why you'd trade any kind of pick for a player Collingwood are delisting is beyond me.
You don't see all us trying to trade Kingsley or Cockatoo-Collins off.
If you offer a trade, and it is something you don't mind losing, you haven't offered enough, basically.
- Feb 19, 2003
- 1,195
- 5
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Thread starter
- #45
agree PORT01
hel end up at carlton, theyll take anyone with the predicament they are in
I cant understand why Collingwood would want Stevens in the first place as they have too many of these midfield types as it is.Stevens is not going to win you a flag.
Collingwood need to concentrate on getting a ruckman more so than anything else.
Collingwood need to concentrate on getting a ruckman more so than anything else.
- Feb 19, 2003
- 1,195
- 5
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Thread starter
- #48
OUR CENTRE LINE IS GETTING OLD
Buckley and Burns arnt spring chickens
Buckley and Burns arnt spring chickens
- May 1, 2002
- 11,190
- 17,835
- AFL Club
- Carlton
What type of a statement is that ............ some people in here really need to stop this crap or get off.
all about opinion buddy. Your list is clearly the worst in the league, and u would take Rupert
