Pauline Hanson - One Nation Party

Remove this Banner Ad

h-1.png
 
CLUBMEDhurst said:
The blue collar types left the fold years ago to become "Howard's Battlers"
Click to expand...

Yes they were sold down the river years ago to chase the ethnic and luvvie "soial conscience" vote. Labour assumed they could ignore them as they wouldn't vote for anyone else.

I recall Howard getting a standing ovation from unionists in Tasmania. Who would have believed that when he came to power?

Its no wonder the ALP want mass immigration to import voters.
 
medusala said:
Yes they were sold down the river years ago to chase the ethnic and luvvie "soial conscience" vote. Labour assumed they could ignore them as they wouldn't vote for anyone else.
Click to expand...

Didn't seem to harm Gough. You are correct that they were sold down the river, thanks to Hawke and Keating's neo-liberal agenda

I recall Howard getting a standing ovation from unionists in Tasmania. Who would have believed that when he came to power?

Its no wonder the ALP want mass immigration to import voters.[/QUOTE]

CFMEU no less. My mates in construction have allus distanced 'emselves from those tossers
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Gough said:
She's the embodiment of much of what you stand for mate, she shares your values, she understands people like you.
Click to expand...

You really must be hitting it hard these days, your posts have gone downhill at a rate of knots of late.

Hanson's policy are old school rural socialism that the Nats used to love. Anyone with half a clue would know thats a million miles away from Adam Smith liberalism.

Gough DESPISED Asian asylum seekers and happily let the Indos slaughter tens of thousands of refugees. So dont kid youself.

Your hero and her were on the same page. And you share her economics.

Grubby, very grubby. Shameful stuff.
 
medusala said:
You really must be hitting it hard these days, your posts have gone downhill at a rate of knots of late.

Hanson's policy are old school rural socialism that the Nats used to love. Anyone with half a clue would know thats a million miles away from Adam Smith liberalism.

Gough DESPISED Asian asylum seekers and happily let the Indos slaughter tens of thousands of refugees. So dont kid youself.

Your hero and her were on the same page. And you share her economics.

Grubby, very grubby. Shameful stuff.
Click to expand...
One Nation doesn't have an economics policy, Hanson doesn't know what an economics is yet. Otherwise, most of what you spout would sit very comfortably on a ON manifesto, and if you're embarrassed by that, you should be.
 
Last edited:
Gough said:
One Nation doesn't have an economics policy, Hanson doesn't know what an economics is yet. Otherwise, most of what you spout would sit very comfortably on a ON manifesto, and if you're embarrassed by that, you should be.
Click to expand...

http://www.onenation.com.au/policies/economics/economics-3

You really are making a tool of yourself on this thread old boy. I am all for highly skilled migration. 40% of the City in London is made up of non Brits. No brainer.

You demean yourself with your sulking over asylum seekers and calling those who oppose your open borders policy as racist.

Who benefits Australia more? Investment bankers or illegal immigrants? Really isnt a tough question. Weird that a noisy minority are too thick to work it out or even worse know but are happy to damage the economic well being of fellow Australians to give themselves a warm inner glow.

Shameless campaigners.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

medusala said:
http://www.onenation.com.au/policies/economics/economics-3

You really are making a tool of yourself on this thread old boy. I am all for highly skilled migration. 40% of the City in London is made up of non Brits. No brainer.

You demean yourself with your sulking over asylum seekers and calling those who oppose your open borders policy as racist.

Who benefits Australia more? Investment bankers or illegal immigrants? Really isnt a tough question. Weird that a noisy minority are too thick to work it out or even worse know but are happy to damage the economic well being of fellow Australians to give themselves a warm inner glow.

Shameless campaigners.
Click to expand...

who benefits Australia more?

investment bankers and the GFC, how much did that end up costing? seriously...investment bankers are full of s**t! how about the rich Chinese buying up half of oz and getting PR along the way, what are they providing that you're so fond of? other than keeping launderers in a job and a healthy dose of pork belly.
 
Juddism said:
who benefits Australia more?

investment bankers and the GFC, how much did that end up costing? seriously...investment bankers are full of s**t! how about the rich Chinese buying up half of oz and getting PR along the way, what are they providing that you're so fond of? other than keeping launderers in a job and a healthy dose of pork belly.
Click to expand...

Dude...


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
One can see how Hanson gets support ie from those utterly clueless on economics

little graham said:
No, it isn't a tough question. If it wasn't for investment bankers, there would be no refugees.
Click to expand...

Juddism said:
how about the rich Chinese buying up half of oz and getting PR along the way, what are they providing that you're so fond of? other than keeping launderers in a job and a healthy dose of pork belly.
Click to expand...
 
Gough said:
One Nation doesn't have an economics policy, Hanson doesn't know what an economics is yet. Otherwise, most of what you spout would sit very comfortably on a ON manifesto, and if you're embarrassed by that, you should be.
Click to expand...
Ive got a dental appoitnment at 4 so consider yourself used rather than singled out for a worthless rant.

Your point about Hanson has never worried Greens supporters either. In fact the Greens openly celebrate their total lack of interest in economic pragmatism and reality. Their supporter base is the new inner city "Howard Comfies", who use the Greens to conveniently hide their innate selfishness and total lack of care for the economic future of the nation..i.e. hide their true lack of care for our childrens future behind a pretence they care about irrelevant and minor social and environmental type s**t. It aint important our kids have a job (that will will simply happen "just coz"), but its vital they rapidly learn how to be a tolerant equal opportunity gender neutral racially diverse Huxleyesque type cloned citizen with no desire to stray from the hive, nor say anything remotely controversial...the new age inner city ultra conservative model.

Supporting the Greens Party is just convenient absolution for the selfish....we all know that. As a Party they dont even pretend to have any economic credibilty. Why would they bother ? It means you can carry on the outward appearance of being a compassionate soul, without the need to care about important decisions that actually effect the nations future. The John Howard "comfies" luv that beautiful absolution so they can still appear to giveashit about others.

When you know you will never wield any true power you neednt worry about having an economics policy. All it can do is expose your own Parties' myopic vision and platform...exactly the same issue that Hanson faces. Its a fine line, but one could at least argue that even a fish and chip shop would generate far more real life experience and economic credibility than half the Party aligned Senators in Canberra could claim. Most are just assorted flotsam that allowed themselves be pushed when the perks of the job lit their fuse.

Somehow though, despite the bleeding obvious, people still vote for these minor party nutjobs with their little visions of how the world should be. The Pauline Hansons and Greens of this world are always so smart they are here to tell us what we should all do, say and think.

The Greens decided they didnt care about the economy or our childrens economic welfare a long time ago..they deliberately went down the path of zero economic credibility...the real worry for all Paulineophobes should be that her mob hasnt yet committed to zero economic credibility like the Greens did, and can now start to import such knowledge into her party if they so choose.

Anything that gets the nation out of the moronic political quagmire of priotisisng everything from pet welfare to transgender education policy gets my tick of approval. Its a sign of misplaced arrogance when such mind numbing utterly irrelevant drivel gets thrown about with a manufactured level of importance by a media focussed on clickbaiting us...when the truly important comes a poor second or intentionally ignored.

We are at the point where we are not allowed to discuss certain things, and that is dangerous....far far more dangerous than permitting opposing viewpoints.

Hanson isnt dangerous nor scary in the slightest...that is simply confected bullshit from the unicorn ideologues hoping to get their way. Those who would prefer to silence an opposing view are the truly dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Bollox said:
Hanson isnt dangerous nor scary in the slightest...that is simply confected bullshit from the unicorn ideologues hoping to get their way. Those who would prefer to silence an opposing view are the truly dangerous.
Click to expand...

If an Islamic preacher came out and offered an opposing view on how we should run our lives Hanson would be the loudest voice calling for them to be banned, jailed or thrown out of the country.

Hanson is far from harmless, not because of the views that she holds, but because the views that she holds are premised on s**t she makes up in her own head.
 
medusala said:
http://www.onenation.com.au/policies/economics/economics-3

You really are making a tool of yourself on this thread old boy. I am all for highly skilled migration. 40% of the City in London is made up of non Brits. No brainer.

You demean yourself with your sulking over asylum seekers and calling those who oppose your open borders policy as racist.

Who benefits Australia more? Investment bankers or illegal immigrants? Really isnt a tough question. Weird that a noisy minority are too thick to work it out or even worse know but are happy to damage the economic well being of fellow Australians to give themselves a warm inner glow.

Shameless campaigners.
Click to expand...

Actually the ABS published multiple reports identifying refugees as the biggest net contributors of all migration intake groups to Australia.

So yeah, refugees actually contribute more in dollar terms than any other type of migrant. Investment bankers included.

And the group that contributes the least were investor class visa holders. Basically rich people with money to invest but no desire to actually work or contribute to society.
 
VineyIsLORD said:
Actually the ABS published multiple reports identifying refugees as the biggest net contributors of all migration intake groups to Australia.
.
Click to expand...

That is utter nonsense though I can believe the gullible twits who liked your post would be so stupid as to believe it. The ABS has stated they are more likely to start their own business, that is vastly different to being highest net contributors.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...ut-have-the-worst-income-20150904-gjfcrm.html

On average, skilled migrants earned a median wage of $43,593 and were from Britain, India, China, South Africa and the Philippines. Family migrants, who have been reunited with family members in Australia earned a median wage of $30,000 and humanitarian visa holders, earned a median wage of $27,000.


http://theconversation.com/factchec...welfare-with-an-unemployment-rate-of-97-54395

For refugees, marked here as “humanitarian”, that works out to be an unemployment rate of about 33%.

Another longitudinal study from 2011 found that while during the early years of settlement unemployment was high among refugees compared to other migrants, 43% of working age refugees remain unemployed 18 months after arrival in Australia
 
CLUBMEDhurst said:
Didn't seem to harm Gough. You are correct that they were sold down the river, thanks to Hawke and Keating's neo-liberal agenda

I recall Howard getting a standing ovation from unionists in Tasmania. Who would have believed that when he came to power?

Its no wonder the ALP want mass immigration to import voters.
Click to expand...

CFMEU no less. My mates in construction have allus distanced 'emselves from those tossers[/QUOTE]
Key word there is Tasmania....;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Aristotle Pickett
Vic The joke that is the Victorian Liberal Party.
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
135
Views
6K
Saint
Saint
Geoff
The Joke that is the West Australian Liberal Party
2 3
Replies
59
Views
3K
blueboy25
blueboy25
nut
One nation
Replies
9
Views
599
Gralin
Gralin
Northalives
"Praying For Power". The City Builders Pentecostal Church and the Victorian Liberal Party.
Replies
8
Views
1K
Sun Ra
Sun Ra
T
Why do the regions still keep voting for the Nationals?
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Schneebly11
Schneebly11

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top