Religion Pell Guilty!

[CheapCharlie]

Yes. Most accused don't have books published about them with information leaked from the cops who set up an investigation before there was a complainant shortly after Pell had exposed the now police commissioner for lying at a Parliamentary Inquiry.

In what form should the special consideration take place?
A previous posters said an interstate trail or an overseas trail.
There has been hundreds of cases where there has been enormous pre trail publicity, some lasting for years. What special consideration did those trials receive?

 

[RupieDupie]

Yes. Most accused don't have books published about them with information leaked from the cops who set up an investigation before there was a complainant shortly after Pell had exposed the now police commissioner for lying at a Parliamentary Inquiry.

Pell supporters should probably ask for a Royal Commission, it seems like these people have the power to break this conspiracy, yet do not seem to be bothered to do so. Why should anyone take them seriously?

 

[western royboy]

They probably think that they are acting in good faith by defending the institution.

I would argue that is the definitive example of gross hypocrisy

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

In what form should the special consideration take place?
A previous posters said an interstate trail or an overseas trail.
There has been hundreds of cases where there has been enormous pre trail publicity, some lasting for years. What special consideration did those trials receive?

Perhaps if you could specify what trials they were I could answer.

Chamberlain?

 

[CheapCharlie]

Perhaps if you could specify what trials they were I could answer.

Chamberlain?

Lets make it simple
What special consideration do you think Pell should have received and why is he deserving of it

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Lets make it simple
What special consideration do you think Pell should have received and why is he deserving of it

So you don’t have an answer?

There’s no legal way to fix what happened to Pell.

I think Victoria should allow judge alone trials.

 

[CheapCharlie]

So you don’t have an answer?

There’s no legal way to fix what happened to Pell.

I think Victoria should allow judge alone trials.

But do YOU have an answer?

What special treatment should Pell have received, that no one else receives?

His publicity was no different than hundreds of cases before him

What special consideration should Pell have been given?

 

[FredLeDeux]

But do YOU have an answer?

What special treatment should Pell have received, that no one else receives?

His publicity was no different than hundreds of cases before him

What special consideration should Pell have been given?

Yes it was.
I cannot remember any case in which Australia'a largest and most pervasive media organisation so persistently and vociferously claimed that a person was innocent, even before he was charged, and before his trial.

 

[TheGreatBarryB]

I think Victoria should allow judge alone trials.

Absolutely

 

[CheapCharlie]

Yes it was.
I cannot remember any case in which Australia'a largest and most pervasive media organisation so persistently and vociferously claimed that a person was innocent, even before he was charged, and before his trial.

Shouldnt have that helped him?

 

[FredLeDeux]

Shouldnt have that helped him?

Who knows?

 

[Bunkdar]

He has got off
What is taking so long ? They gonna dump the verdict on a busy newsday

 

[CheapCharlie]

Who knows?

Even with all the media pushing his innocence he was found guilty.

Im not sure what more special treatment people wanted him to have

 

[Bunkdar]

Even with all the media pushing his innocence he was found guilty.

Im not sure what more special treatment people wanted him to have

Maybe he was just.....guilty

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Even with all the media pushing his innocence he was found guilty.

Im not sure what more special treatment people wanted him to have

If you truly believe that you are entirely delusional.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

But do YOU have an answer?

What special treatment should Pell have received, that no one else receives?

His publicity was no different than hundreds of cases before him

What special consideration should Pell have been given?

I gave an answer. Judge only trials.

Who are these hundreds of cases before him with the same publicity?

 

[Bunkdar]

I gave an answer. Judge only trials.

Who are these hundreds of cases before him with the same publicity?

The defenders of child fukin want 2 make Pell the victim

 

[CheapCharlie]

I gave an answer. Judge only trials.

Who are these hundreds of cases before him with the same publicity?

Dont be thick. Almost every single high profile trial.
Pell had less publicity than most due court suppression orders

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Dont be thick. Almost every single high profile trial.
Pell had less publicity than most due court suppression orders

Name. One.

 

[skilts]

Name. One.

Ned Kelly, to this day.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Ned Kelly, to this day.

Kelly made admissions. Next.

 

[CheapCharlie]

Name. One.

Fairly much any high profile murder, rape, kiddy fiddler, fraud case
They all received high levels of pre trial publicity.
unlike your friend Pell, there wasn't entire media organisations declaring them innocent
Off te tp of my head..
Gordon Wood
Ivan Milat
David Eastman
Peter FOster
ALan Bond
Skase
Craig Thomson
Dennis Ferguson
Daniel Morcombe case
Ron medich

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Fairly much any high profile murder, rape, kiddy fiddler, fraud case
They all received high levels of pre trial publicity.
unlike your friend Pell, there wasn't entire media organisations declaring them innocent
Off te tp of my head..
Gordon Wood
Ivan Milat
David Eastman
Peter FOster
ALan Bond
Skase
Craig Thomson
Dennis Ferguson
Daniel Morcombe case
Ron medich

None of these had anything like the publicity. Except perhaps Milat

All you've done is list high profile court cases.

And one or two opinion writers is not an entire media organisation. And even if it was, which it wasn't, in a world of innocent until proven guilty how do you explain the taxpayer funded media organisation's conduct? Declaring him guilty.

 

[CheapCharlie]

None of these had anything like the publicity. Except perhaps Milat

All you've done is list high profile court cases.

And one or two opinion writers is not an entire media organisation. And even if it was, which it wasn't, in a world of innocent until proven guilty how do you explain the taxpayer funded media organisation's conduct? Declaring him guilty.

None of those received the media suport for innocence that pell did.
All of them received more negative pre trial publicity

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

None of those received the media suport for innocence that pell did.
All of them received more negative pre trial publicity

And all of them had more evidence than the discredited evidence of a single person.