Remove this Banner Ad

Religion Pell Guilty!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. The two judges of the Court of Appeal who upheld the conviction know every bit as well as I do that he couldn't have committed the offence.

You can't say that.
None of the judges were saying anything about their opinions of guilt.
One judge said that the verdict was incorrect. The other two were fine with it. (Not the correct legal words but general point stands)
 
Wato
Really...do tell...
Maybe all that evidence of his innocence is in the redacted evidence from the RC?:drunk:

I seriously can't believe that Bruce still thinks that this is a conspiracy by ...?
 
No. He could have gone further to limit them. He could have limited them to the same amounts paid by the state to victims of state employees.
Yes he could, only the bishop conference and the pope stopped him. The state has no limits on suing them. You should be happy now that one of the most evil Australians that ever lived will rot in jail.
 
Telling the surviving victim of Pell's rape does not seek any financial compensation.

But that poor bloke who died on the end of a needle because of what Pell did to him.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

giphy.gif
 
Yes. There is no realistic way he could have committed the offence. Certainly not unseen.
The problem isn't the evidence or lack thereof, it is your sense of reality.
 
Not on a Mod on here and Bruce is still entitled to his opinion and not really breaking any rules that I can see.

His opinion is in contempt of the Court of Appeal.
 
Come the F on people. Bruce is full of S and wrong, but he's surely allowed to express his genuinely held opinion on the case.

Not if he's accusing the Court of Appeal of corruption.

Unless Chief wants to end up on that list of publishers who faced contempt charges first time round in these hearings.
 
You can get two weeks for saying that Syria is better than Queensland in the lead up to a game against Brissy on the North board then getting ambushed by a Lions mod who admits in PMs they picked a "random post" to card because they were cut over the joke.
This never happened. End of public discussion of modding, per rules.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Just remember folks, little old ladies my dear deceased granny will be filling up collection plates to pay for his appeal to the High Court.
 
Serious point - how does St Pats remain consecrated ground now it is proven scene of vicious rapes?
They haven't had a dude in a dress walk around it with their magic wand to bless it?
 
Not if he's accusing the Court of Appeal of corruption.

Unless Chief wants to end up on that list of publishers who faced contempt charges first time round in these hearings.

I didn’t. You did your best to goad me into that but I didn’t.

I might think it, but I didn’t write it.

Edit: Geezus, I see you even ridiculed me for saying why I didn’t do it at the same time as trying to get me banned for having done what I refused to do! Extraordinary.
 
Last edited:
Any issues with modding must be taken up privately with mods and admin.

Any posts you think need action should be reported. I have indicated the "Report" button in this picture for those who cannot find it.

731173
 
I didn’t. You did your best to goad me into that but I didn’t.

I might think it, but I didn’t write it.

Jeez I wouldn't want you defending me spangle, you did just write it.

And you did earlier anyway, you said the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal KNEW they were making the wrong decision but did it anyway.

That's about as contempty as it gets.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Why are mods allowing a pedophile apologist like Bruce to pollute BigFooty? They should be purging the board of filth like this.
Disagree. Bruce has voiced his opinion in (mho) a fair way. Does appear he has copped more personal abuse towards him than has fired.
 
I didn’t. You did your best to goad me into that but I didn’t.

I might think it, but I didn’t write it.

Edit: Geezus, I see you even ridiculed me for saying why I didn’t do it at the same time as trying to get me banned for having done what I refused to do! Extraordinary.

Not as extraordinary as continuing to defend a convicted paedophile on the grounds like you know more than the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal.

No offence Bruce, but this thread has shown that your grasp of law is tenuous at best.
 
I thinks it telling that not only does Bruce continues to defend a convicted child rapists...he also refuses to apologise for the disgraceful things he wrote about the survivors of sexual abuse on this very thread

I honesty bewildered that anyone could write the shit he has wrote
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top