Cardinal Pell and the Church weren’t risking it with a no win no fee lawyer. I’d imagine he’s the most expensive criminal defence lawyer in the state if they used him...Is he a no win no fee lawyer type?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Cardinal Pell and the Church weren’t risking it with a no win no fee lawyer. I’d imagine he’s the most expensive criminal defence lawyer in the state if they used him...Is he a no win no fee lawyer type?
Richter is one of the best criminal defence barristers there is, combined with the rest of the legal team sure the victims like the church paying for that when the victims under Pell's plan got pocket change. Mind you he does defend people no one else probably wants to like Julian Knight.Appeal lodged.
Pell’s barrister, Robert Richter QC, filed an appeal against the conviction on 21 February. That could obviously take some time to play out, but the appeal is based on the following grounds:
1 - The verdict of the jury was unreasonable, in contrary to the evidence before them
2 - It was not right that defence were not allowed to present jurors with a digital animation they intended to screen during their closing address
3 - The way the jury was constituted was unfair
Not sure that I ever believed the story of him being unwell.Richter is one of the best criminal defence barristers there is, also obviously one of the most expensive combined with the rest of the legal team sure the victims like the church paying for that when the victims under Pell's plan got pocket change.
Pell isn't well don't be surprised if he doesn't see too much, if any time in jail whilst living in some luxury provided by the church whilst the various appeals take a while.
Richter is one of the best criminal defence barristers there is, also obviously one of the most expensive combined with the rest of the legal team sure the victims like the church paying for that when the victims under Pell's plan got pocket change.
Pell isn't well don't be surprised if he doesn't see too much, if any time in jail whilst living in some luxury provided by the church whilst the various appeals take a while.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Is he a no win no fee lawyer type?
Ironic that the only way he’ll face real justice is if the afterlife his church sells to prospective members turns out to be real.Pell isn't well don't be surprised if he doesn't see too much, if any time in jail whilst living in some luxury provided by the church whilst the various appeals take a while.
He is 70 odd and probably sees it as someone has to.How is it that Robert Richter always seems to be the one defending the worst scum in Victoria?
Possibly but he is nearly 80Not sure that I ever believed the story of him being unwell.
Appeal lodged.
Pell’s barrister, Robert Richter QC, filed an appeal against the conviction on 21 February. That could obviously take some time to play out, but the appeal is based on the following grounds:
1 - The verdict of the jury was unreasonable, in contrary to the evidence before them
2 - It was not right that defence were not allowed to present jurors with a digital animation they intended to screen during their closing address
3 - The way the jury was constituted was unfair
If not out on appeal?Even Richter has admitted that some form of gaol time is inevitable.
Maybe pell and church will be sued civilly now , church has a bit of money in real estate, churches seem to be highest spot in areasHe is the best there is - there are no costs in a criminal trial so how can bw be no win no fee?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
At what point does the greedy Catholic church change its 'married to the church doctrine'. Even the church itself admits it has far more paedos on its book than in society.
Any institution banning love between man and woman, which is the most basic and primal aspects of humanity, should not and should never have been trusted.
It seems common sense. Not even in hindsight.
Maybe pell and church will be sued civilly now , church has a bit of money in real estate, churches seem to be highest spot in areas
That model was cheap at10k getting upHis defence was paid for by rich benefactors - would have been millions - Richter is a 15K a day man
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Maybe pell and church will be sued civilly now , church has a bit of money in real estate, churches seem to be highest spot in areas
Worth considering it's the alternate. The rules don't make them like this. The rules and general community had attracted people already like this.
That model was cheap at10k getting up